SkillAgentSearch skills...

template-authoring

Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions.

Install / Use

npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill template-authoring

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Tags

Our assessment of template-authoring

template-authoring scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 873rd of 2,398 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 37%).

Its SKILL.md is 13 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 4 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 5,471 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
16/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so template-authoring is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

template-authoring compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than template-authoring; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
template-authoring (this skill)by dotnet875.5k2d agoSKILL.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10044.0k5d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7ktodayCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install template-authoring?
Run npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill template-authoring. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does template-authoring work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is template-authoring safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is template-authoring still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so template-authoring is actively maintained.

name: template-authoring description: > Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions. USE FOR: creating a reusable dotnet new template from an existing project, bootstrapping .template.config/template.json with correct identity, shortName, parameters, and post-actions, adding parameters or conditional content to a template you are authoring, validating the template.json you are authoring before publishing, packaging templates as NuGet packages for distribution. DO NOT USE FOR: validating an existing template.json as a standalone task (use template-validation), finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery and template-instantiation), MSBuild project file issues unrelated to template authoring, NuGet package publishing (only template packaging structure). license: MIT

Template Authoring

This skill helps an agent create and validate custom dotnet new templates. It guides bootstrapping templates from existing projects and validates template.json files for authoring issues before publishing.

When to Use

  • User wants to create a reusable template from an existing .csproj
  • User wants to validate a template.json they are authoring before publishing
  • User is setting up .template.config/template.json from scratch
  • User wants to package a template for NuGet distribution

When Not to Use

  • User wants to find or use existing templates — route to template-discovery or template-instantiation
  • User has MSBuild issues unrelated to template authoring — route to dotnet-msbuild plugin

Inputs

| Input | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | Source project path | For creation | Path to the .csproj to use as template source | | template.json path | For validation | Path to an existing template.json to validate | | Template name | For creation | Human-readable name for the template | | Short name | Recommended | Short name for dotnet new <shortname> usage |

Workflow

Rules that change the answer

Use these structures exactly; do not invent fields from other template features.

Deliver the requested artifact. When the user says "show", "write", or "give me the content", put the complete JSON/XML in the final response even if you also wrote it to disk. Never edit this skill's SKILL.md or plugin documentation as a substitute for authoring the user's template. Only create or modify template files when the user requested file changes and the target template/project is present.

| Need | Correct structure | Never use | |------|-------------------|-----------| | Conditional XML in a .csproj | XML comments such as <!--#if (database == "SqlServer") --> and <!--#endif --> around the complete element | bare #if lines, which make the XML invalid | | Restore generated projects | restore action 210D431B-A78B-4D2F-B762-4ED3E3EA9025; use primaryOutputs, or args.files containing source-template paths/globs | run-script fields such as executable on the restore action | | Restrict to the SDK host | a host constraint whose args is an array containing { "hostname": "dotnetcli" }; its optional version restricts the host/CLI version | using host version when the requirement is specifically the active SDK version, the invalid host ID dotnet-cli, or unrelated pattern / value fields | | Restrict the active SDK version | an sdk-version constraint with a NuGet version/range string in args | a machine-specific exact patch unless the template truly requires it | | Preserve CPM | keep generated PackageReference items versionless and package the owning Directory.Packages.props when the template is self-contained | adding inline Version attributes | | Package templates | a pack project with <PackageType>Template</PackageType> and template content packed below content/ | describing a layout without showing the requested project file |

Step 1: Bootstrap from existing project

Analyze the source .csproj and create a .template.config/template.json:

  1. Copy the source project into a dedicated template-source directory by default, preserving the original project untouched. Modify the original in place only when the user explicitly asks for that layout.
  2. Create .template.config inside the template-source directory.
  3. Generate template.json with identity (reverse-DNS), name, shortName, sourceName (project name for replacement), classifications, and tags
  4. Preserve from source — generic dotnet new templates frequently get these wrong, so verify each is carried over from the original .csproj:
    1. SDK type — Microsoft.NET.Sdk, Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web, Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Worker, etc.
    2. Analyzer/package reference metadata — PrivateAssets, IncludeAssets, ExcludeAssets
    3. OutputType and other key properties — TreatWarningsAsErrors, Nullable, LangVersion
    4. CPM participation — no inline Version attributes when a Directory.Packages.props is present
    5. Custom build props/targets and Directory.Build.props conventions
    6. Repo conventions — folder layout, naming, global.json SDK pin

Minimal example:

{
  "$schema": "http://json.schemastore.org/template",
  "author": "MyOrg",
  "classifications": ["Library"],
  "identity": "MyOrg.Templates.MyLib",
  "name": "My Library Template",
  "shortName": "mylib",
  "sourceName": "MyLib",
  "tags": { "language": "C#", "type": "project" }
}

Required output — do not stop at a minimal stub. Write the complete .template.config/template.json for the actual source project, then emit a short conventions-preserved confirmation so the user can see nothing was silently dropped. This carry-over is the whole value of the skill; a generic dotnet new template that loses these is why authoring ties with a hand-written stub.

| Source .csproj setting | Carried over? | How | |--------------------------|---------------|-----| | SDK (Microsoft.NET.Sdk.*) | ✅ | template content .csproj uses same SDK | | TreatWarningsAsErrors / Nullable / LangVersion | ✅ | preserved verbatim in template .csproj | | PackageReference PrivateAssets / IncludeAssets / ExcludeAssets | ✅ | metadata kept on each reference | | CPM (Directory.Packages.props present) | ✅ | ManagePackageVersionsCentrally remains enabled and no inline Version attributes are emitted |

Mark any row you intentionally omitted as ⚠️ with a reason — never leave it implicit.

Step 2: Validate template.json

Validate the generated template.json using the template-validation skill (it owns the full rule set — required fields, identity format, reserved shortName conflicts, parameter datatypes, post-actions, constraints, and tags).

Quick summary of what gets checked:

  • Required fields — identity, name, and shortName must be present.
  • ShortName conflicts — avoid names that collide with dotnet new subcommands. Read the authoritative set from the Commands: section of dotnet new --help for the installed SDK and do not hardcode it (it can change between versions); illustrative examples from current SDKs are install, uninstall, update, list, search, details, create. A conflict happens because dotnet new <name> would be parsed as the subcommand of the same name. Top-level dotnet verbs like build, run, test, and publish do NOT conflict. Run dotnet new list to confirm the name is not already taken.
  • Parameters, post-actions, tags — see template-validation for the complete rules, including the valid datatype list.

Step 3: Refine the template

Based on validation results and user requirements:

  1. Add parameters with appropriate types (string, bool, choice), defaults, and descriptions

  2. Add conditional content using the file type's valid syntax. In XML use template directives inside XML comments, not bare preprocessor lines:

    <!--#if (database == "SqlServer") -->
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer" />
    <!--#endif -->
    <!--#if (database == "Postgres") -->
    <PackageReference Include="Npgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL" />
    <!--#endif -->
    
  3. Configure post-actions for solution add, restore, or custom scripts

  4. Set constraints to restrict which SDKs or workloads the template supports

  5. Add classifications and tags for discoverability

For a restore post-action, prefer primaryOutputs when the project path is known:

"primaryOutputs": [{ "path": "MyProject.csproj" }],
"postActions": [{
  "description": "Restore NuGet packages.",
  "manualInstructions": [{ "text": "Run 'dotnet restore'." }],
  "actionId": "210D431B-A78B-4D2F-B762-4ED3E3EA9025",
  "continueOnError": true
}]

If args.files is needed, its paths are matched against the source template before renames, for example "files": ["**/*.csproj"]. Explain that distinction.

Step 4: Test the template locally

For a create-from-existing-project request, this step is required rather than optional: install the authored template, run a dry-run, instantiate it into a temporary output folder, and build the generated project. Report each observed result; inspecting template.json alone does not prove the reusable template works.

dotnet new install ./path/to/template/root
dotnet new mylib --name TestProject --dry-run
dotnet new mylib --name TestProject --output ./test-output
dotnet build ./test-output/TestProject

When packaging is requested, include the complete pack project, not only a directory tree:

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <PackageId>Contoso.ProjectTemplates</PackageId>
    <PackageType>Template</PackageType>
    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
    <IncludeBuildOutput>false</IncludeBuildOutput>
    <NoWarn>$(NoWarn);NU5128</NoWarn>
  </PropertyGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
    <Compile Remove="**\*" />
    <Content Include="templates\**\*" Pack="true" PackagePath="content\" />
  </ItemGroup>
</Project>

The pack project's target framework applies only to the content-only packaging project; it does not retarget projects inside templates/. Prefer a broadly available supported framework unless the packaging project itself uses newer build features.

For a self-contained CPM template, the packaged Directory.Packages.props must include <ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>true</ManagePackageVersionsCentrally> and every versionless PackageReference must have a matching PackageVersion. Keep the props file at the intended generated repository root; do not place a duplicate nearer the project where it changes lookup.

Validation

  • [ ] template.json passes manual validation with zero errors
  • [ ] Template identity and shortName are unique and meaningful
  • [ ] All parameters have descriptions and appropriate defaults
  • [ ] Template can be installed, dry-run, and instantiated successfully
  • [ ] Created projects build cleanly with dotnet build
  • [ ] Conditional content produces correct output for all parameter combinations
  • [ ] XML template directives are wrapped in XML comments and the generated project parses
  • [ ] Host constraints use args[].hostname; restore actions use primaryOutputs or args.files

Common Pitfalls

| Pitfall | Solution | |---------|----------| | Identity format issues | Use reverse-DNS format (e.g., MyOrg.Templates.WebApi). Avoid spaces or special characters. | | ShortName conflicts with CLI commands | Avoid names that match a dotnet new subcommand; read the live set from dotnet new --help and don't hardcode it (illustrative examples: install, uninstall, update, list, search, details, create). Top-level verbs like build/run/test/publish are fine. Run dotnet new list to see if the name is already taken. |

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars5.5k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated2d ago
Forks418

Languages

C#

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions