SkillAgentSearch skills...

generate-testability-wrappers

DO NOT USE when the target already consumes an injected interface or built-in abstraction such as IFileSystem or TimeProvider, even if the request says "generate a wrapper"; no new wrapper is needed.

Install / Use

npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill generate-testability-wrappers

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of generate-testability-wrappers

generate-testability-wrappers scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 887th of 2,398 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 37%).

Its SKILL.md is 15 KB long, well organised into 19 sections with 12 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 5,471 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
16/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so generate-testability-wrappers is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

generate-testability-wrappers compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than generate-testability-wrappers; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
generate-testability-wrappers (this skill)by dotnet875.5k2d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.6k11d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10073.9ktodayCLAUDE.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10044.0k5d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7ktodayCLAUDE.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install generate-testability-wrappers?
Run npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill generate-testability-wrappers. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does generate-testability-wrappers work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is generate-testability-wrappers safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is generate-testability-wrappers still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so generate-testability-wrappers is actively maintained.

name: generate-testability-wrappers description: > DO NOT USE when the target already consumes an injected interface or built-in abstraction such as IFileSystem or TimeProvider, even if the request says "generate a wrapper"; no new wrapper is needed. Use only when C# source calls an ambient/static dependency and no injectable seam exists: first-time TimeProvider, IHttpClientFactory, or System.IO.Abstractions adoption; minimal Environment/Console/Process wrappers; IProcessRunner; DI registration; or an ambient seam that preserves a static API. Exclude static detection (detect-static-dependencies), migration to an existing/registered abstraction (migrate-static-to-wrapper), one blocked behavior plus deterministic tests (testability-obstacle), and general interface design. license: MIT

Generate Testability Wrappers

Generate wrapper interfaces, default implementations, and DI service registration code for untestable static dependencies. For statics that already have .NET built-in abstractions (TimeProvider, IHttpClientFactory), guide adoption of the built-in. For statics without built-in alternatives, generate custom minimal wrappers.

When to Use

  • After running detect-static-dependencies and identifying which statics to wrap
  • When the user asks to make a class testable by replacing statics with injected abstractions
  • When adopting TimeProvider (.NET 8+) or System.IO.Abstractions
  • When creating a custom wrapper for Environment.*, Console.*, or Process.*
  • When a released static API needs an ambient seam because signatures cannot change

When Not to Use

  • The user wants to find statics first (use detect-static-dependencies)
  • The user wants to bulk-replace call sites (use migrate-static-to-wrapper)
  • The static is already behind an interface

If the target already consumes an injected interface or built-in abstraction, stop: do not add a second wrapper, project, registration, or test around that seam.

A missing DI package does not by itself force an ambient seam. For an instantiable class, prefer constructor injection and compose it explicitly or show the requested registration. Use Step 5 when the API is static and its signatures must stay static, or when the user explicitly forbids caller construction/DI changes.

Inputs

| Input | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | Static category | Yes | Which category: time, filesystem, environment, network, console, process | | Target framework | Yes | The TargetFramework from .csproj (affects which built-in abstractions exist) | | Composition | No | Existing DI framework, explicit/manual construction, or immutable static API | | Namespace | No | Target namespace for generated wrapper code |

Workflow

Step 1: Determine the abstraction strategy

Based on the category and target framework:

| Category | .NET 8+ | .NET 6-7 | .NET Framework | |----------|---------|----------|----------------| | Time | TimeProvider (built-in) | TimeProvider via Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider NuGet | Custom ISystemClock | | File system | System.IO.Abstractions (NuGet) | Same | Same | | HTTP | IHttpClientFactory (built-in) | Same | Same | | Environment | Custom IEnvironmentProvider | Same | Same | | Console | Custom IConsole | Same | Same | | Process | Custom IProcessRunner | Same | Same |

The table picks which abstraction. How it reaches the code under test is a separate axis:

  • instantiable class: constructor injection, even if current callers compose the object manually;
  • existing container: add compile-ready registration following its conventions;
  • public static API/signatures that cannot change: Step 5's ambient seam.

Check for a host builder, IServiceCollection, existing registrations, and construction sites. Do not infer "must remain static" merely because the project currently has no container.

Step 2: Generate built-in abstraction adoption (Time, HTTP)

TimeProvider (.NET 8+)

No wrapper code needed. Complete all four parts: production registration, constructor injection, a FakeTimeProvider test, and the testing package.

  1. Register in DI:
builder.Services.AddSingleton(TimeProvider.System);
  1. Inject into classes:
public class OrderProcessor(TimeProvider timeProvider)
{
    public bool IsExpired(Order order)
        => timeProvider.GetUtcNow() > order.ExpiresAt;
}
  1. Test with FakeTimeProvider:
// Requires Microsoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing NuGet
var fakeTime = new FakeTimeProvider(new DateTimeOffset(2026, 1, 15, 0, 0, 0, TimeSpan.Zero));
var processor = new OrderProcessor(fakeTime);
fakeTime.Advance(TimeSpan.FromDays(1));
Assert.True(processor.IsExpired(order));

The assertion must prove a time-dependent result after the fake is pinned or advanced. Merely constructing FakeTimeProvider is not a test. When the project has no container but the target is an instantiable class, inject TimeProvider anyway and show explicit production construction with TimeProvider.System; do not replace it with a custom static clock.

Before calling the adoption complete, verify the repository contains or the answer supplies every required artifact: the testing package reference, the production composition/registration, every affected constructor call, and a runnable fake-time test. A code fragment that omits one of those integration points is guidance, not a completed adoption.

TimeProvider (pre-.NET 8)

Guide: install Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider NuGet. Same API as above.

IHttpClientFactory

No wrapper code needed. Register a typed client via builder.Services.AddHttpClient<MyService>() and inject HttpClient directly into the class constructor. Preserve cancellation by passing the caller's token to the HTTP operation.

For tests, provide a complete fake HttpMessageHandler whose SendAsync returns a deterministic HttpResponseMessage, construct HttpClient with that handler, and exercise the typed client without network access. Compile and run the focused test when the task asks for implementation; do not stop at a schematic handler method.

When production uses a typed-client registration, test that same registration pipeline: configure its primary handler in ServiceCollection, resolve the typed client, and call it. A test that manually constructs HttpClient proves the class but not the DI registration the task asked to adopt.

Step 3: Generate custom wrappers (Environment, Console, Process)

For categories without built-in abstractions, follow this template:

Interface — define the minimal surface

Only include methods that were actually detected in the codebase. Do NOT generate a wrapper for every possible member — wrap only what is used.

Prefer a stateless operation-shaped interface. For example, if a caller only needs to start a process, wait, and return its exit code, expose one Run operation rather than a stateful wrapper that leaks Process lifecycle.

namespace <Namespace>;

/// <summary>
/// Abstraction over <static class> for testability. 
/// </summary>
public interface I<WrapperName>
{
    // One method per detected static call
    <return type> <MethodName>(<parameters>);
}

Default implementation — delegate to the real static

namespace <Namespace>;

/// <summary>
/// Default implementation that delegates to <static class>.
/// </summary>
public sealed class <WrapperName> : I<WrapperName>
{
    public <return type> <MethodName>(<parameters>)
        => <StaticClass>.<Method>(<arguments>);
}

DI registration

// In Program.cs or Startup.cs:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<I<WrapperName>, <WrapperName>>();

Treat registration as a deliverable, not a sentence in the summary. Add it to the repository's existing registration surface when one exists. Otherwise show the exact compile-ready statement and identify where the caller should place it. Stateless delegating wrappers are singleton; if state must be retained, explain why a shorter lifetime is required.

Step 4: Generate file system wrapper adoption

Prefer the established System.IO.Abstractions NuGet package over custom wrappers:

  1. Install the package:
dotnet add package System.IO.Abstractions
  1. Register in DI:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IFileSystem, FileSystem>();
  1. Inject IFileSystem into classes:
public class ConfigLoader(IFileSystem fileSystem)
{
    public string LoadConfig(string path)
        => fileSystem.File.ReadAllText(path);
}
  1. Test with MockFileSystem:
dotnet add <TestProject> package System.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers
var mockFs = new MockFileSystem(new Dictionary<string, MockFileData>
{
    { "/config.json", new MockFileData("{\"key\": \"value\"}") }
});
var loader = new ConfigLoader(mockFs);
Assert.Equal("{\"key\": \"value\"}", loader.LoadConfig("/config.json"));

Package-first adoption is exclusive: add both package references, use IFileSystem in production, register or explicitly compose FileSystem, and seed MockFileSystem before exercising the consumer. Do not also generate a second custom filesystem interface, and do not present an unseeded mock whose test could pass without proving the requested read/write behavior.

Step 5: Generate a signature-preserving ambient context

Use this pattern when the API must remain static or its released signatures cannot accept a dependency:

public static class Clock
{
    private static readonly AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>?> s_override = new();
    public static DateTime UtcNow
        => s_override.Value?.Invoke() ?? TimeProvider.System.GetUtcNow().UtcDateTime;

    internal static IDisposable Override(DateTime fixedUtcTime)
    {
        if (fixedUtcTime.Kind != DateTimeKind.Utc)
            throw new ArgumentException("The override must be UTC.", nameof(fixedUtcTime));

        var previous = s_override.Value;
        s_override.Value = () => fixedUtcTime;
        return new Scope(previous);
    }
    private sealed class Scope : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Func<DateTime>? _previous;
        private bool _disposed;

        public Scope(Func<DateTime>? previous)
        {
            _previous = previous;
        }

        public void Dispose()
        {
            if (_disposed)
                return;

            s_override.Value = _previous;
            _disposed = true;
        }
    }
}

Key trade-offs: AsyncLocal<T> ensures parallel tests don't interfere; production cost is one null check per call; the static readonly field is essentially free.

Three properties this pattern must keep, because each has broken a real migration:

  • Scope the override and make it reversible. Return an IDisposable that restores the previous value, so a test cannot leak a pinned time into the next one. A bare setter, or a manual try/finally at each call site, puts that burden on every test author.
  • Use AsyncLocal<T>, never [ThreadStatic]. [ThreadStatic] does not flow across await, so the override silently disappears mid-test.
  • Preserve the semantics of the member you are replacing. Substituting DateTime.UtcNow with a local-time source changes the DateTimeKind every existing caller and stored value depends on — pair UtcNow with GetUtcNow(), and Now with GetLocalNow().
  • Prove the test assembly can reach the override. An internal override is inaccessible from a separate test assembly unless the production project adds the exact InternalsVisibleTo for that test assembly. Otherwise use an already-public seam only when a public API change is authorized. Never show a test calling an inaccessible member.

The same shape works for non-time statics: swap TimeProvider.System.GetUtcNow() for the real static call and keep the override slot, the disposable scope, and the original semanti

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars5.5k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated2d ago
Forks418

Languages

C#

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions