authoring-github-workflows
Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run.
Install / Use
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill authoring-github-workflowsInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
AutomationSupported Platforms
Our assessment of authoring-github-workflows
authoring-github-workflows scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 907th of 1,554 Automation skills we index.
Its SKILL.md is 8.8 KB long, well organised into 18 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 5,471 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so authoring-github-workflows is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
authoring-github-workflows compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than authoring-github-workflows; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| authoring-github-workflows (this skill)by dotnet | 87 | 5.5k | 2d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 85.6k | 11d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| rufloby ruvnet | 100 | 73.3k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 83.9k | today | MCP Server |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 4d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install authoring-github-workflows?
- Run
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill authoring-github-workflows. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does authoring-github-workflows work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is authoring-github-workflows safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is authoring-github-workflows still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so authoring-github-workflows is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: authoring-github-workflows description: "Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run. USE FOR: editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/, writing run-name/name/if/env/run values that contain ${{ }} expressions, diagnosing a run that fails with 'This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue' and no jobs starting, deciding when a workflow scalar must be quoted, validating workflows with actionlint. DO NOT USE FOR: authoring application YAML unrelated to GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI, or non-workflow YAML. SCOPE: this skill covers syntactic/structural correctness of workflow YAML (quoting, parsing, actionlint); for semantic and functional workflow design (what a workflow should do, agentic-workflow behavior), see .github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md — the two are complementary. INVOKES: actionlint (downloaded pinned binary) plus git/grep for inspection." license: MIT
Authoring GitHub Actions Workflows Safely
GitHub Actions workflow files are YAML, but valid YAML is not the same as a valid workflow. A workflow can parse cleanly with yaml.safe_load (or a casual review) yet still be rejected by GitHub Actions at load time — producing the opaque failure "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue" with zero jobs started. This skill teaches the YAML-vs-Actions traps (the #-as-comment trap above all), how to quote expression scalars correctly, and how to validate with actionlint before merge.
Scope: syntactic vs. semantic. This skill is about the syntactic and structural correctness of workflow YAML — quoting, parsing, and
actionlint-level validity that determines whether GitHub Actions will load and run a file at all. It is not about what a workflow should do or how an agentic workflow should behave. For semantic and functional guidance (designing workflow logic, agentic-workflow patterns, gh-aw authoring), use.github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md. The two are complementary: get the behavior right with the agent, get the YAML right with this skill.
When to Use
- Editing, adding, or reviewing any file under
.github/workflows/. - Writing a
run-name,name,if,env,with, orrunvalue that embeds a${{ }}expression. - A workflow run failed with "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue" and no jobs ran.
- Eval/CI on
mainsuddenly breaks for every run after a workflow edit merged, even though the change "looked fine." - Deciding whether a YAML scalar needs quoting.
When Not to Use
- Authoring non-Actions YAML (app config, Kubernetes, Compose, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI).
- Pure shell/script logic inside an already-valid
run:block (that is a scripting task, not a workflow-syntax task).
The #1 Trap: # inside an unquoted expression becomes a YAML comment
In YAML, a space followed by # starts a comment. In an unquoted (plain) scalar, everything from that space-then-# to end-of-line is silently discarded:
# BAD — the run-name is silently truncated at " #"
run-name: ${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR #{0} @ {1}', inputs.pr_number, inputs.head_sha) || '' }}
YAML parses this as run-name: ${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR — an unterminated ${{ expression. yaml.safe_load succeeds (it just sees a truncated string with a trailing comment), so the bug passes naive validation, but GitHub Actions rejects the malformed expression and refuses to start any run.
# GOOD — wrap the whole value in double quotes so '#' stays inside the scalar
run-name: "${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR #{0} @ {1}', inputs.pr_number, inputs.head_sha) || '' }}"
The inner expression already uses single quotes, so double-quoting the scalar is safe. This is exactly the bug that broke dotnet/skills evaluation on main (PR #746 → fixed by quoting).
Other characters that force quoting in a plain scalar
| Character / pattern | Why it breaks | Fix |
|---------------------|---------------|-----|
| space then # (space-hash) | Starts a YAML comment; truncates the value | Quote the whole value |
| Leading *, &, !, ?, \|, >, @, ` | YAML anchors/aliases/tags/block scalars | Quote the value |
| Leading { or [ | Parsed as flow mapping/sequence (a bare ${{ }} starts with $, which is safe, but {{ after a leading char is risky) | Quote the value |
| : then space (colon-space) inside the value | Parsed as a nested mapping key | Quote the value |
| Leading/trailing spaces that matter | Plain scalars strip them | Quote the value |
| Values that are true/false/yes/no/on/off/numbers but must stay strings | YAML type coercion | Quote the value |
Rule of thumb: if a name, run-name, if, env, or with value contains a ${{ }} expression and any literal #, :, or leading special character, wrap the entire scalar in double quotes.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the changed/authored workflow files
git diff --name-only origin/main... -- .github/workflows/
For each file, scan every line that contains ${{ together with a #, a colon-space, or a leading special character.
Step 2: Quote risky expression scalars
Wrap the full value in double quotes when the value embeds an expression and contains a # or other special character (see the table above). Prefer double quotes when the inner expression uses single quotes, and vice-versa. Do not escape the ${{ }} braces — quoting the scalar is enough.
Step 3: Validate with actionlint (authoritative)
actionlint understands the GitHub Actions schema and the expression grammar, so it catches exactly this class of bug that plain YAML linters miss. Download a pinned release and run it:
ACTIONLINT_VERSION=1.7.7
ACTIONLINT_SHA256=023070a287cd8cccd71515fedc843f1985bf96c436b7effaecce67290e7e0757
curl -fsSLo actionlint.tar.gz \
"https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/releases/download/v${ACTIONLINT_VERSION}/actionlint_${ACTIONLINT_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz"
# Verify the download against the pinned checksum before extracting/executing it:
echo "${ACTIONLINT_SHA256} actionlint.tar.gz" | sha256sum -c -
tar -xzf actionlint.tar.gz actionlint
# Focus on workflow/expression correctness; silence shell/py style noise:
./actionlint -shellcheck= -pyflakes= -color .github/workflows/*.yml
On Windows PowerShell, use the actionlint_<ver>_windows_amd64.zip asset and Expand-Archive.
The truncated-expression bug surfaces as:
got unexpected EOF while lexing end of string literal, expecting ''' [expression]
A clean exit code 0 means the workflows are structurally valid.
Step 4: Confirm a YAML-only check is not enough
Do not rely on yaml.safe_load, yamllint, or "it parses" as proof. They accept the truncated-comment form. Only actionlint (or pushing and watching GitHub Actions parse it) validates the Actions layer.
Step 5: Keep the CI gate green
This repository runs actionlint automatically (see .github/workflows/actionlint.yml) on any PR that touches .github/workflows/. Ensure your change passes that check before requesting review. If you add a new workflow, the gate covers it automatically.
Validation
- [ ] Every
${{ }}value containing#, a colon-space, or a leading special character is wrapped in quotes. - [ ]
actionlint -shellcheck= -pyflakes= .github/workflows/*.ymlexits0. - [ ] No workflow run reports "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue".
- [ ] The
actionlintCI check is green on the PR.
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Unquoted run-name/name with # inside the expression | Wrap the whole value in double quotes |
| Trusting yaml.safe_load/yamllint/a code review to catch it | Run actionlint; YAML-only checks accept the truncated form |
| Escaping ${{ braces to "fix" it | Don't — quote the scalar instead; escaping breaks the expression |
| Using single quotes around a value that contains single quotes | Use double quotes for the outer scalar |
| Adding actionlint with shellcheck enabled and drowning in pre-existing shell-style warnings | Run with -shellcheck= -pyflakes= to focus on workflow/expression errors |
| Assuming a green YAML lint means the workflow will run | Push and confirm jobs actually start, or rely on the actionlint gate |
References
- actionlint — static checker for GitHub Actions workflows.
- GitHub Actions: workflow syntax
- YAML 1.2 spec — comments
- Repository skill-authoring guide:
.agents/skills/create-skill/SKILL.md
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
85.6kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
ruflo
73.3k🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Scrapling
83.9k🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
