SkillAgentSearch skills...

cwicr-subcontractor

Analyze and compare subcontractor bids against CWICR benchmarks. Evaluate pricing, identify outliers, and support negotiation.

Install / Use

npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-subcontractor

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

91/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of cwicr-subcontractor

cwicr-subcontractor scores 91/100 on our quality scale, 135th of 320 Customer Support skills we index (top 43%).

Its SKILL.md is 13 KB long, well organised into 17 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 333 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
11/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 44 days ago, so cwicr-subcontractor is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

cwicr-subcontractor compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than cwicr-subcontractor; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
cwicr-subcontractor (this skill)by datadrivenconstruction9133344d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10091.2k19d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.4ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10085.7ktodayMCP Server
crawl4aiby unclecode10084.8ktodayMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install cwicr-subcontractor?
Run npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-subcontractor. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does cwicr-subcontractor work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is cwicr-subcontractor safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is cwicr-subcontractor still maintained?
The repository was last updated 44 days ago, so cwicr-subcontractor is actively maintained.

name: "cwicr-subcontractor" description: "Analyze and compare subcontractor bids against CWICR benchmarks. Evaluate pricing, identify outliers, and support negotiation." homepage: "https://datadrivenconstruction.io" metadata: {"openclaw": {"emoji": "🗄️", "os": ["darwin", "linux", "win32"], "homepage": "https://datadrivenconstruction.io", "requires": {"bins": ["python3"]}}}

CWICR Subcontractor Analyzer

Business Case

Problem Statement

Evaluating subcontractor bids requires:

  • Fair price benchmarks
  • Bid comparison
  • Outlier identification
  • Negotiation support

Solution

Compare subcontractor bids against CWICR cost data to identify fair pricing, outliers, and negotiation opportunities.

Business Value

  • Fair evaluation - Objective benchmarks
  • Cost savings - Identify overpriced bids
  • Risk detection - Flag unrealistic low bids
  • Negotiation support - Data-driven discussions

Technical Implementation

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
from statistics import mean, stdev


class BidStatus(Enum):
    """Bid evaluation status."""
    COMPETITIVE = "competitive"
    HIGH = "high"
    LOW = "low"
    OUTLIER_HIGH = "outlier_high"
    OUTLIER_LOW = "outlier_low"


@dataclass
class SubcontractorBid:
    """Subcontractor bid."""
    subcontractor_name: str
    trade: str
    bid_amount: float
    scope_items: List[Dict[str, Any]]
    includes_material: bool
    includes_labor: bool
    includes_equipment: bool
    duration_days: int
    notes: str = ""


@dataclass
class BidEvaluation:
    """Bid evaluation result."""
    subcontractor_name: str
    bid_amount: float
    benchmark_cost: float
    variance: float
    variance_percent: float
    status: BidStatus
    line_item_analysis: List[Dict[str, Any]]
    recommendation: str


class CWICRSubcontractor:
    """Analyze subcontractor bids using CWICR data."""

    OUTLIER_THRESHOLD = 0.30  # 30% from benchmark
    HIGH_THRESHOLD = 0.15    # 15% above benchmark
    LOW_THRESHOLD = -0.10    # 10% below benchmark

    def __init__(self,
                 cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame,
                 overhead_rate: float = 0.12,
                 profit_rate: float = 0.10):
        self.cost_data = cwicr_data
        self.overhead_rate = overhead_rate
        self.profit_rate = profit_rate
        self._index_data()

    def _index_data(self):
        """Index cost data."""
        if 'work_item_code' in self.cost_data.columns:
            self._code_index = self.cost_data.set_index('work_item_code')
        else:
            self._code_index = None

    def calculate_benchmark(self,
                            scope_items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
                            include_overhead: bool = True,
                            include_profit: bool = True) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Calculate benchmark cost for scope."""

        labor = 0
        material = 0
        equipment = 0

        line_items = []

        for item in scope_items:
            code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
            qty = item.get('quantity', 0)

            if self._code_index is not None and code in self._code_index.index:
                wi = self._code_index.loc[code]
                item_labor = float(wi.get('labor_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
                item_material = float(wi.get('material_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
                item_equipment = float(wi.get('equipment_cost', 0) or 0) * qty

                labor += item_labor
                material += item_material
                equipment += item_equipment

                line_items.append({
                    'code': code,
                    'quantity': qty,
                    'labor': round(item_labor, 2),
                    'material': round(item_material, 2),
                    'equipment': round(item_equipment, 2),
                    'total': round(item_labor + item_material + item_equipment, 2)
                })

        direct_cost = labor + material + equipment

        overhead = direct_cost * self.overhead_rate if include_overhead else 0
        profit = (direct_cost + overhead) * self.profit_rate if include_profit else 0

        return {
            'labor': round(labor, 2),
            'material': round(material, 2),
            'equipment': round(equipment, 2),
            'direct_cost': round(direct_cost, 2),
            'overhead': round(overhead, 2),
            'profit': round(profit, 2),
            'total': round(direct_cost + overhead + profit, 2),
            'line_items': line_items
        }

    def evaluate_bid(self, bid: SubcontractorBid) -> BidEvaluation:
        """Evaluate single subcontractor bid."""

        benchmark = self.calculate_benchmark(bid.scope_items)
        benchmark_cost = benchmark['total']

        variance = bid.bid_amount - benchmark_cost
        variance_pct = (variance / benchmark_cost * 100) if benchmark_cost > 0 else 0

        # Determine status
        if variance_pct > self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * 100:
            status = BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH
            recommendation = "Bid significantly above benchmark. Request detailed breakdown or reject."
        elif variance_pct < -self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * 100:
            status = BidStatus.OUTLIER_LOW
            recommendation = "Bid significantly below benchmark. Verify scope understanding and capacity."
        elif variance_pct > self.HIGH_THRESHOLD * 100:
            status = BidStatus.HIGH
            recommendation = "Bid above benchmark. Consider negotiation or alternative bidders."
        elif variance_pct < self.LOW_THRESHOLD * 100:
            status = BidStatus.LOW
            recommendation = "Bid below benchmark. Verify completeness and quality approach."
        else:
            status = BidStatus.COMPETITIVE
            recommendation = "Bid within acceptable range. Proceed with standard evaluation."

        # Line item analysis
        line_analysis = []
        for i, item in enumerate(bid.scope_items):
            if i < len(benchmark['line_items']):
                bench_item = benchmark['line_items'][i]
                # Assume proportional pricing
                expected = bench_item['total'] / benchmark['direct_cost'] * bid.bid_amount if benchmark['direct_cost'] > 0 else 0
                line_analysis.append({
                    'code': item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code')),
                    'benchmark': bench_item['total'],
                    'expected_in_bid': round(expected, 2)
                })

        return BidEvaluation(
            subcontractor_name=bid.subcontractor_name,
            bid_amount=bid.bid_amount,
            benchmark_cost=benchmark_cost,
            variance=round(variance, 2),
            variance_percent=round(variance_pct, 1),
            status=status,
            line_item_analysis=line_analysis,
            recommendation=recommendation
        )

    def compare_bids(self,
                      bids: List[SubcontractorBid]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Compare multiple bids."""

        if not bids:
            return {}

        evaluations = [self.evaluate_bid(bid) for bid in bids]

        # Statistics
        amounts = [e.bid_amount for e in evaluations]
        avg_bid = mean(amounts)
        std_bid = stdev(amounts) if len(amounts) > 1 else 0

        # Rank by variance from benchmark
        ranked = sorted(evaluations, key=lambda x: abs(x.variance_percent))

        # Find best value
        competitive = [e for e in evaluations if e.status == BidStatus.COMPETITIVE]
        if competitive:
            best_value = min(competitive, key=lambda x: x.bid_amount)
        else:
            best_value = ranked[0]

        # Identify outliers
        outliers = [e for e in evaluations if e.status in [BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH, BidStatus.OUTLIER_LOW]]

        return {
            'bid_count': len(bids),
            'average_bid': round(avg_bid, 2),
            'std_deviation': round(std_bid, 2),
            'spread': round(max(amounts) - min(amounts), 2),
            'spread_percent': round((max(amounts) - min(amounts)) / avg_bid * 100, 1) if avg_bid > 0 else 0,
            'benchmark': evaluations[0].benchmark_cost,
            'best_value': {
                'name': best_value.subcontractor_name,
                'amount': best_value.bid_amount,
                'variance_from_benchmark': best_value.variance_percent
            },
            'lowest_bid': {
                'name': min(evaluations, key=lambda x: x.bid_amount).subcontractor_name,
                'amount': min(amounts)
            },
            'outliers': [
                {'name': e.subcontractor_name, 'status': e.status.value, 'variance': e.variance_percent}
                for e in outliers
            ],
            'evaluations': evaluations
        }

    def generate_negotiation_points(self,
                                     evaluation: BidEvaluation) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
        """Generate negotiation points based on evaluation."""

        points = []

        if evaluation.status in [BidStatus.HIGH, BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH]:
            points.append({
                'topic': 'Overall Price',
                'benchmark': evaluation.benchmark_cost,
                'bid': evaluation.bid_amount,
                'target': round(evaluation.benchmark_cost * 1.05, 2),  # 5% above benchmark
                'potential_savings': round(evaluation.bid_amount - evaluation.benchmark_cost * 1.05, 2)
            })

            # Suggest line item discussions
            for item in evaluation.line_item_analysis:
                points.append({
                    'topic': f"Line Item: {item['code']}",
                    'benchmark': item['benchmark'],
                    'suggestion': 'Request detailed breakdown'
                })

        return points

    def export_bid_comparison(self,
                               comparison: Dict[str, Any],
                               output_path: str) -> str:
        """Export bid comparison to Excel."""

        with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
            # Summary
            summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
                'Number of Bids': comparison['bid_count'],
                'Average Bid': comparison['average_bid'],
                'Spread': comparison['spread'],
                'Spread %': comparison['spread_percent'],
                'Benchmark': comparison['benchmark'],
                'Best Value Bidder': comparison['best_value']['name'],
                'Lowest Bidder': comparison['lowest_bid']['name']
            }])
            summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)

            # All evaluations
            eval_df = pd.DataFrame([
                {
                    'Subcontractor': e.subcontractor_name,
                    'Bid Amount': e.bid_amount,
                    'Benchmark': e.benchmark_cost,
                    'Variance': e.variance,
                    'Variance %': e.variance_percent,
                    'Status': e.status.value,
                    'Recommendation': e.recommendation
                }
                for e in comparison['evaluations']
            ])
            eval_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Evaluations', index=False)

        return output_path

Quick Start

# Load CWICR data
cwicr = pd.read_parquet("TR_workitems_costs_resources_DDC_CWICR.parquet")

# Initialize analyzer
analyzer = CWICRSubcontractor(cwicr)

# Define scope
scope = [
    {'work_item_code': 'ELEC-001', 'quantity': 100},
    {'work_item_code': 'ELEC-002', 'quantity': 50}
]

# Create bid
bid = SubcontractorBid(
    subcontractor_name="ABC Electric",
    trade="Electrical",
    bid_amount=75000,
    scope_items=scope,
    includes_material=True,
    includes_labor=True,
    includes_equipment=True,
    duration_days=30
)

# Evaluate
evaluati

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars333
CategoryCustomer
Updated1mo ago
Forks82

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions