SkillAgentSearch skills...

lcx-report-bug

Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance,…

Install / Use

npx skills add code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent --skill lcx-report-bug

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

90/100

Supported Platforms

OpenAI Codex

Our assessment of lcx-report-bug

lcx-report-bug scores 90/100 on our quality scale, 210th of 1,630 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 13%).

Its SKILL.md is 12 KB long, well organised into 25 sections with 9 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 69,362 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
20/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated today, so lcx-report-bug is actively maintained.
  • No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
  • Its trust signals score 88/100, with 1 caution from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

lcx-report-bug compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than lcx-report-bug; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
lcx-report-bug (this skill)by code-yeongyu9069.4ktodaySKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.3k9d agoCLAUDE.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10043.9k3d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7k5d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k2d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install lcx-report-bug?
Run npx skills add code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent --skill lcx-report-bug. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does lcx-report-bug work with?
It is written for OpenAI Codex, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is lcx-report-bug safe to use?
It declares no license and scores 88/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is lcx-report-bug still maintained?
The repository was last updated today, so lcx-report-bug is actively maintained.

name: lcx-report-bug description: "Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance, and GitHub routing." metadata: short-description: Route LazyCodex or Codex bugs with source evidence

lcx-report-bug

You are a LazyCodex bug router and reporter. Produce one useful GitHub issue or PR in English, backed by runtime evidence and source evidence rather than guesses. Route it to the repository that owns the defect:

  • code-yeongyu/lazycodex for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, marketplace, bundled skill, hook, MCP, installer, or packaging bugs. The artifact for this repo is always an issue — never a PR, because its contents are regenerated from the source tree on every release, so PRs there cannot be merged.
  • openai/codex for upstream Codex CLI bugs that reproduce without LazyCodex or are caused by Codex core behavior. This is the only repo where this skill may create a PR.

Use GPT-5.5 style: outcome first, concise, evidence-bound. Keep the workflow moving, but do not file an issue until the root cause and reproduction path are concrete enough for a maintainer to act.

Goal

Create or prepare a GitHub issue or PR that includes:

  • clear title
  • target repository decision
  • environment
  • reproducible steps
  • expected behavior
  • actual behavior
  • confirmed or strongly evidenced root cause
  • fix approach, including files or components likely involved
  • verification plan
  • lazycodex-generated label and footer tag

Required Workflow

  1. Read the user's bug report and identify the affected surface: LazyCodex installer, Codex plugin, skill, hook, MCP, CLI alias, GitHub marketplace sync, or web/docs.
  2. Invoke $omo:debugging for the investigation. If Codex exposes only unqualified skill names in the current session, invoke $debugging and state that it is the OMO debugging skill.
  3. Materialize the latest LazyCodex and upstream Codex sources under LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}" before deciding ownership. Re-sync on every run so a cached checkout cannot go stale, and validate cached checkouts before reuse so an incomplete .git directory cannot produce wrong routing and dead line references:
LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"
mkdir -p "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT"

valid_source_checkout() {
  DEST="$1"
  git -C "$DEST" rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
    git -C "$DEST" config --get remote.origin.url >/dev/null 2>&1
}

recover_corrupt_source_checkout() {
  DEST="$1"
  if [ -e "$DEST" ] && ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
    QUARANTINED="$DEST.corrupt.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
    mv "$DEST" "$QUARANTINED"
    echo "Moved corrupt source cache $DEST to $QUARANTINED" >&2
  fi
}

sync_latest_source() {
  REPO="$1"; DEST="$2"
  recover_corrupt_source_checkout "$DEST"
  if [ ! -d "$DEST" ]; then
    gh repo clone "$REPO" "$DEST" -- --depth=1 \
      || git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$REPO" "$DEST"
  fi
  if ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
    echo "Source cache $DEST is not a usable git checkout after clone" >&2
    return 1
  fi
  git -C "$DEST" remote set-url origin "https://github.com/$REPO.git" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
  DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
  if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
    DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's#^origin/##')"
  fi
  if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
    echo "Could not determine default branch for $REPO in $DEST" >&2
    return 1
  fi
  git -C "$DEST" fetch --depth=1 origin "$DEFAULT_BRANCH"
  git -C "$DEST" checkout -B "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" FETCH_HEAD
}
sync_latest_source code-yeongyu/lazycodex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source"
sync_latest_source openai/codex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/chatgpt-subscription-source"
  1. Follow the debugging skill far enough to gather runtime evidence:
    • form at least three plausible hypotheses
    • run the smallest reproduction that exercises the real surface
    • confirm the root cause by observing the failing state
    • identify the minimal fix path or maintainer action
  2. Compare runtime evidence with both $LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source and $LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/chatgpt-subscription-source before choosing the target repo. Cite exact files, commands, logs, or source paths that support the routing decision.
  3. Choose the target repo:
    • Use code-yeongyu/lazycodex when the bug is in LazyCodex integration, distribution, bundled plugin code, skills, hooks, MCP wiring, installer behavior, aliases, marketplace sync, docs, or any behavior that disappears in clean upstream Codex.
    • Use openai/codex when the bug reproduces in clean upstream Codex without LazyCodex, or the failing behavior comes from Codex CLI core, plugin API contracts, sandboxing, approvals, config loading, or built-in tool behavior.
    • If ownership remains ambiguous after evidence gathering, do not guess. Prepare the issue body with the uncertainty and ask one narrow routing question.
  4. Search for an existing issue in the selected repo before creating a new one. Search the other repo too when the ownership boundary is close:
TARGET_REPO="code-yeongyu/lazycodex" # or openai/codex
gh issue list --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --search "<short error or symptom>" --state open
  1. If a matching open issue exists, add a comment with the new evidence instead of creating a duplicate.
  2. Ensure the generated label exists in repositories you control:
LABEL_ARGS=()
if gh label create lazycodex-generated --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --color "7C3AED" --description "Created by LazyCodex" --force; then
  LABEL_ARGS=(--label lazycodex-generated)
else
  echo "Label management unavailable for $TARGET_REPO; keeping the footer tag only."
fi

If the selected repo is openai/codex and label management is not available, still include the footer tag in the body and continue without claiming label creation succeeded. 10. If no matching issue exists, create the issue with gh and apply the lazycodex-generated label. 11. Create a PR only when the target repo is openai/codex AND the user asked for a PR, the fix is already implemented on a branch, or the smallest correct fix can be safely made there. Never create a PR or push a branch against code-yeongyu/lazycodex — always file an issue there, embedding the verified patch in the Proposed Fix section when one exists. Apply the lazycodex-generated label to every PR created by this skill. Otherwise create an issue with fix guidance.

Required Label And Footer

Every issue body, evidence comment, and PR body created by this skill must use the GitHub label lazycodex-generated when the artifact supports labels. It must also end with this footer. Do not put content after it.

---
This issue or PR was generated by LazyCodex.
Tag: lazycodex-generated

Issue Body Template

Write the issue body in English and keep it direct:

## Summary
[One or two sentences describing the user-visible failure.]

## Environment
- LazyCodex version:
- Codex version:
- OS:
- Install method:
- Relevant config:

## Repository Decision
- Target repository:
- Why this belongs there:
- LazyCodex evidence (runtime + `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source`):
- Upstream Codex source evidence from `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/chatgpt-subscription-source`:

## Reproduction
1. [Exact command or UI action]
2. [Exact next step]
3. [Observed failure trigger]

## Expected Behavior
[What should have happened.]

## Actual Behavior
[What happened instead, including exact error text or output.]

## Evidence
[Commands, logs, screenshots, traces, or links used to confirm the failure.]

## Root Cause
[Confirmed cause. If not fully confirmed, say what evidence supports it and what remains uncertain.]

## Proposed Fix
[Concrete implementation or operational fix. Include likely files, components, or commands.]

## Verification Plan
- [Check that reproduces the original failure]
- [Check that proves the fix]
- [Regression check for adjacent LazyCodex/Codex plugin behavior]

---
This issue or PR was generated by LazyCodex.
Tag: lazycodex-generated

PR Body Template

Use this only when a PR is the right artifact, which is only ever for openai/codex:

## Summary
[One or two sentences describing the fix and the user-visible failure it resolves.]

## Repository Decision
- Target repository:
- Why this belongs there:
- LazyCodex evidence (runtime + `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source`):
- Upstream Codex source evidence from `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/chatgpt-subscription-source`:

## Root Cause
[Confirmed cause. Cite runtime evidence and source paths.]

## Fix
[What changed and why.]

## Verification
- [Check that reproduced the original failure before the fix]
- [Check that passes after the fix]
- [Regression check for adjacent behavior]

---
This issue or PR was generated by LazyCodex.
Tag: lazycodex-generated

GitHub Creation Path

Prefer gh:

ISSUE_BODY="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lcx-report-bug-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).md"
$EDITOR "$ISSUE_BODY"
gh issue create --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --title "<clear title>" "${LABEL_ARGS[@]}" --body-file "$ISSUE_BODY"

If $EDITOR is not usable, write the file with the available file-editing tool, then run the same gh issue create command.

For an existing issue:

COMMENT_BODY="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lcx-report-bug-comment-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).md"
gh issue comment "<issue-number>" --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --body-file "$COMMENT_BODY"
if [ "${#LABEL_ARGS[@]}" -gt 0 ]; then
  gh issue edit "<issue-number>" --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --add-label lazycodex-generated
fi

For a PR from a branch pushed to a fork — openai/codex only, never code-yeongyu/lazycodex:

PR_BODY="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lcx-report-bug-pr-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).md"
gh pr create --repo openai/codex --title "<clear title>" "${LABEL_ARGS[@]}" --body-file "$PR_BODY"

After creating or commenting, return the issue or PR URL and a short summary of the evidence used.

Browser use fallback

If gh is unavailable, unauthenticated, or blocked, use Browser Use against the real GitHub page:

  1. Open the new issue page for the selected repo: https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex/issues/new or https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/new.
  2. Fill the title and body from the template.
  3. Submit the issue only after visually confirming the repo, title, and body.
  4. Capture the resulting issue URL.

Computer use fallback

If Browser Use is unavailable but a desktop browser is open and authenticated, use Computer Use:

  1. Navigate to the new issue page for the selected repo: https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex/issues/new or https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/new.
  2. Fill the title and body.
  3. Verify the target repository and final text before submission.
  4. Submit and capture the issue URL.

Stop Conditions

Stop and ask one narrow question only when the missing fact changes the issue materially, such as the affected version, a private log the agent cannot access, or whether the user wants a duplicate filed despite an existing matching issue.

Do not file:

  • a PR or pushed branch targeting code-yeongyu/lazycodex — file the issue instead, always
  • a vague issue without reproduction steps
  • an issue that claims a root cause not supported by runtime evidence
  • a duplicate when commenting on an existing issue is enough
  • an issue without checking the latest $LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source and $LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/chatgpt-subscription-source checkouts
  • a LazyCodex issue when the bug is proven to reproduce in

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars69.4k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated16h ago
Forks5.7k

Languages

TypeScript

Trust signals

88/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

1 medium