SkillAgentSearch skills...

ego-lite-simplify

Find and implement evidence-backed simplifications in the ego-lite repository

Install / Use

npx skills add citrolabs/ego-lite --skill ego-lite-simplify

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

82/100

Category

Operations

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of ego-lite-simplify

ego-lite-simplify scores 82/100 on our quality scale, 202nd of 292 Operations skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.7 KB long, split into 6 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 16,515 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
11/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
18/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so ego-lite-simplify is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

ego-lite-simplify compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than ego-lite-simplify; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
ego-lite-simplify (this skill)by citrolabs8216.5k3d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.5k11d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10073.8ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10083.8ktodayMCP Server
LocalAIby mudler10049.3ktodayMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install ego-lite-simplify?
Run npx skills add citrolabs/ego-lite --skill ego-lite-simplify. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does ego-lite-simplify work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is ego-lite-simplify safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is ego-lite-simplify still maintained?
The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so ego-lite-simplify is actively maintained.

name: ego-lite-simplify description: Find and implement evidence-backed simplifications in the ego-lite repository. Use when reviewing the codebase for dead code, duplicated state or APIs, speculative abstractions, unnecessary compatibility layers, hand-written infrastructure, excessive tests or documentation, or when the user asks to reduce code size or maintenance complexity without hiding behavior changes.

Simplify ego-lite

Reduce concepts and maintenance surface, not just line count. Prefer a few well-proven deletions over a long list of guesses.

Establish the contract

  1. Read AGENTS.md and the design document that owns the affected behavior.
  2. Inspect git status and preserve unrelated user changes.
  3. Decide whether the request is an audit or an authorized implementation. Do not turn a cleanup into a product decision without making the behavior change explicit.
  4. Identify the relevant boundary before judging code:
    • globalThis.ego is supplied by the closed-source app; docs/native-bindings-api.md documents that external contract.
    • The runtime has direct CLI and embedded SDK startup paths.
    • Public agent APIs must stay aligned across implementation, tests, help(), and skills/ego-browser/SKILL.md.
    • Browser state can outlive the short Node.js process.

Find strong candidates

Start with production areas carrying the most state, branching, or public surface. Look for:

  • Exports, helpers, events, options, fallbacks, packages, or state fields with no production consumer.
  • Tests or documentation that are the only consumers of behavior that is no longer required.
  • Multiple representations of the same page, task-space, session, ref, lifecycle, or output state.
  • Pass-through layers that add vocabulary but no policy, isolation, or test seam.
  • Compatibility code that is unnecessary on an explicitly breaking branch.
  • Generality with no current product use, such as unsupported concurrency modes or unused extension points.
  • Special cases, rollback paths, or validation that exist only to protect a removable surface.
  • Hand-written parsers, queues, retry logic, or utilities that a Node.js built-in or healthy dependency can replace with less total code.

Do not count moving logic into a wrapper as simplification. Estimate the net result: implementation, tests, docs, public names, state transitions, and special cases removed minus new glue and dependencies added.

Prove each candidate

Use rg first. Search exact symbols, method forms, event names, configuration keys, error codes, protocol strings, and dynamic registration points. Read the callers rather than relying only on static-analysis output.

Classify evidence as:

  • Production: package/ego-browser/src, runtime scripts, build and loader paths, and shipped site learnings.
  • Contract: public JSDoc consumed by help(), skills/ego-browser/SKILL.md, architecture documents, and native binding behavior.
  • Non-production: tests, fixtures, snapshots, comments, and historical or draft documents.
  • Ambiguous: examples and development scripts; inspect how they are invoked before deciding.

Reject or downgrade a candidate when a real production caller exists, the native contract is uncertain, the change merely relocates complexity, or the deletion requires unrelated churn. A small local cleanup may be implemented directly; a behavior or API decision belongs in the owning design document first.

Report before broad removal

For an audit, present each worthwhile candidate with:

  • The surface to remove or fold.
  • Call-site and contract evidence.
  • The user-visible behavior change, or “none”.
  • What complexity disappears and what replacement remains.
  • Confidence, risks, and the smallest verification needed.

Call out candidates that require a user decision separately from behavior-preserving cleanups.

Implement safely

Follow spec-driven TDD when changing code:

  1. Update or add a characterization test when existing behavior must remain.
  2. Update the owning design or API contract before an intentional behavior change.
  3. Remove the implementation and its now-obsolete tests, fixtures, exports, JSDoc, help entries, and skill documentation together.
  4. Keep comments in English and explain only non-obvious constraints.
  5. Prefer deleting a state or transition over adding another abstraction around it.

Run the narrowest relevant checks first. From package/ego-browser/, use npm test for runtime changes, npm run e2e for real task-space/browser behavior, and npm run validate:site-skills for learning changes. Finish with git diff --check and report any verification that could not run.

Never edit generated build output as the source of a simplification. Never remove a defensive path until its trust or lifecycle boundary is understood.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars16.5k
CategoryOperations
Updated3d ago
Forks877

Languages

JavaScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions