SkillAgentSearch skills...

dokoro

Multi-layer agent memory MCP server — working, episodic, semantic, procedural & affective — for Claude Code and any MCP client.

Install / Use

claude mcp add byPawel -- npx -y github:byPawel/dokoro

If the server publishes to npm under a different name, use that package instead — check the repo README.

About this skill
🔌

MCP Server

Model Context Protocol server

Quality Score

83/100

Supported Platforms

Claude Code
Claude Desktop
<div align="center">

🧠 dokoro

Agentic memory for coding agents — affective routing & bi-temporal facts

A multi-layer agent memory MCP server: a persistent brain for your LLM agent. Remember what you're doing, what you did, what you know, and how well each tool actually performs — across sessions, models, and projects. Claim files, leave handoffs, and resume work without guessing — works for one agent today; prevents collisions when you add another.

Website License: MIT Node TypeScript Built on MCP

</div>

Built on the MCP TypeScript SDK. Storage: SQLite (Drizzle ORM) · LanceDB vectors · a small file-backed workspace.


Why this exists

An LLM agent's context window is its only memory, and it's wiped at the end of every session. The agent re-learns the codebase, re-discovers decisions it already made, and repeats tools that failed last time. Most "memory" plugins paper over this with a single undifferentiated vector store — everything dumped in, everything retrieved by fuzzy similarity.

dokoro takes the opposite stance: memory is separated by function, following the CoALA-inspired taxonomy used by Letta, Zep, Mem0, and Cognee. Each layer answers a different question, so the agent retrieves the right kind of memory instead of the most textually similar one.

| The agent asks… | …and the right layer answers | |---|---| | "What was I doing?" | Working memory | | "What happened last time?" | Episodic memory | | "Have I seen this entity before?" | Semantic graph | | "What plan am I executing?" | Procedural memory | | "Does this tool usually work?" | Affective memory |


In practice — a Claude Code session

Monday. Claude Code fixes a flaky login test and logs it as it goes:

You    ▸ The concurrent-login test is flaky. Fix it.
Claude ▸ [calls dokoro_session_log] Logged: root cause = race in session refresh,
         partial fix in auth/session.ts. Open question: needs a regression test.

Thursday, fresh session, zero context. Instead of re-investigating from scratch, Claude recalls:

You    ▸ Pick up the login bug from earlier this week.
Claude ▸ [calls dokoro_session_recall { query: "login", since: "2026-05-12" }]
         Resuming from Monday's session — writing the regression test now.

Summaries are written at session end with dokoro_session_summary_add (and tool outcomes are auto-captured along the way). dokoro_session_recall then returns the matching episodic summaries — narrowed by query substring and an ISO since bound, then semantically re-ranked by embedding similarity (falling back to recency when offline) — as compact text the agent reads directly. Long sessions are auto-compacted once their summaries grow past the token budget; the consolidated summary is retained as a single recallable entry, so nothing drops out of recall:

[2026-05-19T14:32:00Z] session=2026-05-19-login model=claude-opus-4-7 msgs=42
  Fixed race in session refresh; partial fix in auth/session.ts; TODO: regression test

What makes it different

Most memory servers stop at "store text, retrieve by similarity." Two capabilities set dokoro apart — and both are queryable as plain MCP tool calls.

❤️ Affective memory — the agent learns which tools to trust

Every tool outcome is recorded — outcome and latency are captured automatically for wrapped tool calls; confidence is recorded when provided via an explicit dokoro_feedback_record call. The agent then asks dokoro_feedback_route for a ranked track record and biases itself accordingly — no other popular OSS memory lib (Mem0, Letta, Zep, Cognee, LangMem) does this natively.

// MCP tools/call — ranked routing scores for this agent
{
  "name": "dokoro_feedback_route",
  "arguments": { "agent_id": "claude-code", "half_life_days": 14 }
}
dokoro_session_recall:      n=89  success=89  failure=0 partial=0 rejected=0 timeout=0  decayed_rate=1.000 wilson_lower=0.9583 confident=true
dokoro_entity_extract_deep: n=142 success=125 failure=2 partial=0 rejected=0 timeout=15 decayed_rate=0.864 wilson_lower=0.8213 confident=true

Ranking is a Wilson lower bound (so a single lucky success can't outrank a long track record) with recency decay (half_life_days, so stale failures fade) and a confident flag once a tool clears the minimum sample size. The agent prefers the higher wilson_lower — turning past outcomes into a routing policy. Raw aggregates remain available via dokoro_feedback_query.

🕒 Bi-temporal facts — query the graph "as of" any point in time

Every entity_relations row carries valid_from / valid_to (Zep/Graphiti-style), so facts are never destructively overwritten — a superseded fact has its window closed (valid_to set) and a new slice opens. Pass as_of and the graph traversal returns only the relations that were valid at that moment — point-in-time time-travel over the knowledge graph:

// MCP tools/call — what did this module relate to as of April 2026?
{
  "name": "dokoro_entity_graph",
  "arguments": { "entityId": 7, "as_of": "2026-04-01T00:00:00Z" }
}
## Entity: auth/session.ts
- **Type:** file
- **ID:** 7

### Relations (depth 2, 1 found)
- auth/session.ts --[uses]--> jwt-stateless-tokens

Once that fact's window is closed, the default "now" view stops returning it — it only surfaces when you ask "as of" a date inside its validity window; the history is never deleted. Window-closing on supersession is active for single-valued relations (FUNCTIONAL_RELATION_TYPES in entity-extractor.ts is ['superseded_by'] by default, so a newer successor closes the prior open window — add more types there to extend it); genuinely many-valued relations like depends_on or implements accumulate concurrent open facts instead of evicting each other.

Plus: hybrid search (SQLite FTS5 + LanceDB vectors via Reciprocal Rank Fusion) and an optional local LLM (Ollama) for embeddings and deep entity extraction — the server runs fine without it, falling back to regex.


How an agent uses it

dokoro is an MCP server: it exposes tools, and the agent — Claude Code, Gemini CLI, or any MCP client — calls them. There is no autonomy on the server side. The server stores and serves; the agent reads and writes. A typical session forms a loop across the layers:

   ┌──────────────────────────── session ────────────────────────────┐
   │                                                                   │
   ▼                                                                   │
 1. RESUME      workspace_status · session_recall      (read working + episodic)
 2. ORIENT      entity_graph · plan_status             (read semantic + procedural)
 3. ACT         workspace_claim · session_log          (write working)
 4. REFLECT     feedback_record                        (write affective)
 5. ROUTE       feedback_route                         (read affective)  ──┐
 6. PERSIST     workspace_dump                          (write → episodic) │
   │                                                                       │
   └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────◄─┘
  1. Resumedokoro_workspace_status shows whether a task is already in flight; dokoro_session_recall loads summaries of prior sessions. The agent starts informed instead of blank.
  2. Orientdokoro_entity_graph reveals the relevant files/services/decisions and how they relate; dokoro_plan_status shows which plan tasks remain.
  3. Act — it claims the workspace (dokoro_workspace_claim, a file-based lock so two agents don't collide), logs progress with dokoro_session_log, records open questions with dokoro_question_add.
  4. Reflect — after each significant tool call, dokoro_feedback_record captures the outcome (success / failure / latency / confidence).
  5. Routedokoro_feedback_query lets the agent bias itself toward the model or tool that has historically succeeded.
  6. Persistdokoro_workspace_dump flushes the active workspace into durable storage, ready for the next recall.

The payoff: the agent never holds all of this in its context window. It pulls the slice it needs from the layer that owns it, then writes back what it learned.


The five memory layers

| Layer | What it remembers | Where it lives | MCP tools | |---|---|---|---| | 🟢 Working | Current task, locks, open questions | current-workspace.md + sessions(status='active') + questions.json | dokoro_workspace_claim, dokoro_workspace_dump, dokoro_workspace_status, dokoro_session_log, dokoro_question_* | | 🔵 Episodic | Past sessions, time entries, conversation summaries | sessions, time_entries, conversation_summaries | dokoro_session_recall, dokoro_session_log | | 🟣 Semantic | Facts, entities, relations, tags, doc vectors | entities, entity_relations (bi-temporal), doc_entities, tags, doc_tags, docs, LanceDB doc_vectors + chunks | dokoro_entity_graph, dokoro_entity_extract_deep | | 🟠 Procedural | Plans, workflows, checklists | docs(doc_type='plan') + plan JSON files | dokoro_plan_create, dokoro_plan_check, dokoro_plan_validate, dokoro_plan_status, dokoro_plan_list, dokoro_plan_blocker | | 🔴 Affective | Per-tool/per-agent success, failure, latency, confidence | agent_feedback | dokoro_feedback_record, dokoro_feedback_query |

┌───────────── working ─────────────┐    ┌───────── affective ──────────┐
│  workspace.md │ sessions(active)   │    │  agent_feedback               │
└────────────────────────────────────┘    └───────────────────────────────┘
┌──── episodic ────┐  ┌────── semantic ──────┐  ┌──── procedural ────┐
│ sessions │ time_ │  │ entities │ relations │  │ docs(plan)         │
│ entries  │ conv_ │  │ doc_vectors (Lance)  │  │ plans/*.json       │
│ summaries│       │  │ tags │ doc_entities  │  │                    │
└──────────────────┘  └──────────┬───────────┘  └────────────────────┘
                                  │
                           Drizzle / SQLite

Tools

Tools are organised by which memory layer they read or write.

<details open> <summary><strong>🟢 Working memory</strong> — current task</summary>

| Tool | Description | |------|-------------| | dokoro_workspace_status | Check workspace status and active sessions | | dokoro_workspace_claim | Claim workspace with a file-based lock | | dokoro_workspace_dump | Export workspace data (registers docs in SQLite) | | dokoro_session_log | Log development session entries with tags | | dokoro_regenerate_current | Auto-generate or update current.md from recent activity | | dokoro_update_current_section | Update a specific section in current.md | | dokoro_get_current_focus | Read the current focus and active tasks from current.md | | dokoro_block_write | Create/update a shared editable memory block (optimistic version lock) | | dokoro_block_read | Read a shared block (content + version + last updater) | | dokoro_block_list | List shared blocks (key, version, updater) | | dokoro_handoff_write | Record a cross-session handoff (summary + open items) | | dokoro_handoff_inbox | Read open handoffs targeted to / available to an agent | | dokoro_handoff_claim | Atomically claim a handoff so only one agent takes it | | dokoro_presence_ping | Heartbeat —

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars3
CategoryAI
Updated21d ago
Forks1

Languages

TypeScript

Security Score

92/100

Audited on Jul 25, 2026

1 low