SkillAgentSearch skills...

marginaleffects

Manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package, and guide to the book "Model to Meaning"

Install / Use

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill 39-vincentarelbundock-marginaleffects

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

89/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of marginaleffects

marginaleffects scores 89/100 on our quality scale, 652nd of 2,569 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 26%).

Its SKILL.md is 8.2 KB long, well organised into 21 sections with 2 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 4,360 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
18/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so marginaleffects is actively maintained.
  • No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
  • Its trust signals score 88/100, with 1 caution from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

marginaleffects compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than marginaleffects; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
marginaleffects (this skill)by brycewang-stanford894.4k3d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.6k11d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10073.9ktodayCLAUDE.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10044.0k6d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7ktodayCLAUDE.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install marginaleffects?
Run npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill marginaleffects. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does marginaleffects work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is marginaleffects safe to use?
It declares no license and scores 88/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is marginaleffects still maintained?
The repository was last updated 3 days ago, so marginaleffects is actively maintained.

name: marginaleffects description: Manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package, and guide to the book "Model to Meaning". Use when users ask about predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal effects, average treatment effects (ATE/ATT/CATE), hypothesis testing, contrasts, counterfactuals, risk ratios, odds ratios, causal inference with G-computation, or need help with marginaleffects functions like predictions(), comparisons(), slopes(), hypotheses(), datagrid(), avg_predictions(), avg_comparisons(), avg_slopes(), or plot functions. license: CC-BY-4.0 metadata: source: https://marginaleffects.com maintainer: vincentarelbundock allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob

marginaleffects

Primary source of information: https://marginaleffects.com Free book, case studies, and vignettes are available there.

Package manual for R and Python, plus a guide to the companion book.

Book: Model to Meaning: How to Interpret Statistical Models in R and Python

  • Author: Vincent Arel-Bundock (2026)
  • Publisher: CRC Press
  • Free online: https://marginaleffects.com (primary source with many case studies and vignettes)
  • Print: https://routledge.com/9781032908724

Core framework: Five questions for every analysis

Every interpretation task can be decomposed into five disciplined questions:

  1. Quantity: What estimand? (predictions, comparisons, slopes, or tests)
  2. Predictors (Grid): Where to evaluate? (observed values, counterfactual scenarios, balanced grids)
  3. Aggregation: Over whom? (unit-level, group means with by=, weighted averages)
  4. Uncertainty: Which inference method? (delta method, robust SE, bootstrap, Bayesian)
  5. Test: What hypothesis? (null tests, equivalence, pairwise contrasts)

Quick start

Chapter summaries: Read chapters/<chapter>.qmd Function reference: Read man/r/<function>.md or man/python/<function>.md

When to use this skill

  • User asks about predictions, comparisons, slopes, or marginal effects
  • User needs help choosing estimands (ATE, ATT, CATE, risk difference, odds ratio)
  • User asks about marginaleffects function syntax or arguments
  • User wants to interpret model results or test hypotheses
  • User mentions counterfactual analysis, G-computation, or causal inference
  • User references Model to Meaning chapters

Instructions

  1. Classify the request:

    • Conceptual: Which estimand? How to interpret? → Use chapters/
    • Implementation: Function syntax, arguments, code → Use man/r/ or man/python/
    • Mixed: Start with conceptual framing, then provide code
  2. Read the relevant source files:

    • Book chapters: chapters/framework.qmd, chapters/predictions.qmd, chapters/comparisons.qmd, chapters/slopes.qmd, chapters/hypothesis.qmd, etc.
    • R reference: man/r/predictions.md, man/r/comparisons.md, man/r/slopes.md, man/r/hypotheses.md, man/r/datagrid.md
    • Python reference: man/python/predictions.md, man/python/comparisons.md, man/python/slopes.md, man/python/hypotheses.md
  3. Apply the five-question framework to organize your response:

    • Help user define the estimand (Quantity)
    • Clarify where to evaluate it (Grid)
    • Determine aggregation level (Aggregation)
    • Recommend uncertainty quantification (Uncertainty)
    • Specify hypothesis if testing (Test)
  4. Provide concrete code examples using the correct function for their language (R or Python)

Available resources

Book chapters (chapters/)

| File | Topic | Chapter focus | |------|-------|---------------| | framework.qmd | Five-question framework (start here) | Defines the five questions and core quantities (predictions, comparisons, slopes) for turning models into intuitive estimands. | | predictions.qmd | Predicted values and expected outcomes | Defines predictions, grids, aggregation, and tests with predictions()/avg_predictions(). | | comparisons.qmd | Counterfactual comparisons, ATE, ATT, risk ratios | Defines counterfactual comparisons, effect functions, grids, and aggregation with comparisons()/avg_comparisons(). | | slopes.qmd | Marginal effects, partial derivatives | Defines slopes as partial derivatives, conditional on predictors; uses slopes()/avg_slopes(). | | hypothesis.qmd | Hypothesis testing and equivalence | Null vs equivalence tests for any quantity using hypothesis and equivalence arguments. | | interactions.qmd | Interaction effects and effect modification | Interprets heterogeneity and nonlinearity with interactions and polynomials using predictions, comparisons, and slopes. | | categorical.qmd | Categorical predictors and contrasts | Applies the framework to categorical/ordinal outcomes with predictions and comparisons by outcome level. | | experiments.qmd | Experimental designs | ATE in experiments and factorial designs via avg_comparisons() and robust SEs. | | gcomputation.qmd | G-computation and causal inference | G-computation steps for ATE/ATT/ATU/CATE with counterfactual prediction grids. | | uncertainty.qmd | Inference methods (delta, bootstrap, Bayesian) | Delta method, bootstrap, simulation, conformal prediction, and robust/clustered standard errors via inferences()/vcov. | | mrp.qmd | Multilevel regression and poststratification | Multilevel models and poststratification with predictions and comparisons in mixed effects. | | ml.qmd | Machine learning models | Model auditing with predictions, comparisons, and slopes for ML frameworks. | | challenge.qmd | The interpretation challenge | Defines analysis goals, estimands, and why coefficients need transformation. |

R function reference (man/r/)

Core functions (includes avg_* variants): predictions.md, comparisons.md, slopes.md, hypotheses.md Grids: datagrid.md Plots: plot_predictions.md, plot_comparisons.md, plot_slopes.md Utilities: posterior_draws.md, inferences.md, get_dataset.md

Python function reference (man/python/)

Core: predictions.md, avg_predictions.md, comparisons.md, avg_comparisons.md, slopes.md, avg_slopes.md, hypotheses.md Grids: datagrid.md Plots: plot_predictions.md, plot_comparisons.md, plot_slopes.md Model fitting: fit_statsmodels.md, fit_sklearn.md, fit_linearmodels.md

Examples

Logit model example

R:

library(marginaleffects)

# Fit logistic regression
mod <- glm(am ~ hp + wt, data = mtcars, family = binomial)

# Average marginal effects (slopes on probability scale)
avg_slopes(mod)

# Predicted probabilities at specific values
predictions(mod, newdata = datagrid(hp = c(100, 150, 200), wt = 3))

# Average treatment effect: compare hp = 150 vs hp = 100
avg_comparisons(mod, variables = list(hp = c(100, 150)))

# Risk ratio for a 50-unit increase in hp
avg_comparisons(mod, variables = list(hp = 50), comparison = "ratio")

Python:

import marginaleffects as me
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

# Fit logistic regression
mod = smf.logit("am ~ hp + wt", data=me.get_dataset("mtcars")).fit()

# Average marginal effects
me.avg_slopes(mod)

# Predicted probabilities at specific values
me.predictions(mod, newdata=me.datagrid(mod, hp=[100, 150, 200], wt=3))

# Average treatment effect: compare hp = 150 vs hp = 100
me.avg_comparisons(mod, variables={"hp": [100, 150]})

User asks about choosing an estimand: → Read chapters/framework.qmd and chapters/comparisons.qmd, explain the five-question framework, recommend the appropriate quantity (e.g., avg_comparisons() for ATE).

User asks how to compute marginal effects: → Read man/r/slopes.md or man/python/slopes.md, provide syntax with relevant arguments.

User wants to test treatment effect heterogeneity: → Read chapters/comparisons.qmd for CATE concepts, then man/r/hypotheses.md for testing syntax with by= groups.

User asks about counterfactual grids: → Read chapters/framework.qmd (Predictors section) and man/r/datagrid.md for datagrid() usage.

Best practices

  • Ask about language preference: If the user hasn't specified R or Python, ask which they prefer before providing code examples
  • Always frame responses using the five-question framework when appropriate
  • Cite specific sections from summaries or manuals
  • Mention get_dataset() when users need example data
  • For mixed requests, start with conceptual framing then show implementation

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars4.4k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated3d ago
Forks527

Languages

Stata

Trust signals

88/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

1 medium