unit-commitment-operating-rules
Use for day-ahead or multi-period unit commitment problems, including thermal on/off schedules, dispatch, startup/shutdown logic, minimum up/down time, ramping, spinning reserve deliverability, renewable curtailment, operating-cost accounting, and independent feasibility checks for power-system oper…
Install / Use
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill unit-commitment-operating-rulesInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Finance & AccountingSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of unit-commitment-operating-rules
unit-commitment-operating-rules scores 92/100 on our quality scale, 25th of 112 Finance & Accounting skills we index (top 23%).
Its SKILL.md is 8.0 KB long, well organised into 15 sections with 17 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 1,813 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so unit-commitment-operating-rules is actively maintained.
- It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-02. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
unit-commitment-operating-rules compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than unit-commitment-operating-rules; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| unit-commitment-operating-rules (this skill)by benchflow-ai | 92 | 1.8k | 2mo ago | SKILL.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 9d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 9d ago | SKILL.md |
| designby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 11d ago | SKILL.md |
| ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder | 100 | 130.2k | 11d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install unit-commitment-operating-rules?
- Run
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill unit-commitment-operating-rules. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does unit-commitment-operating-rules work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is unit-commitment-operating-rules safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is unit-commitment-operating-rules still maintained?
- The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so unit-commitment-operating-rules is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: unit-commitment-operating-rules description: Use for day-ahead or multi-period unit commitment problems, including thermal on/off schedules, dispatch, startup/shutdown logic, minimum up/down time, ramping, spinning reserve deliverability, renewable curtailment, operating-cost accounting, and independent feasibility checks for power-system operations schedules.
Unit Commitment Operating Rules
Use this skill when a task asks for a day-ahead or multi-period unit commitment schedule with generators, load, reserves, operating constraints, and cost tradeoffs.
This is a reusable UC operating guide. It gives formulation and validation patterns, not a complete task-specific mathematical model.
UC In One Paragraph
Unit commitment decides which generators are online over time, when they start or stop, how much they produce, and how much reserve they can physically provide. It is harder than hourly economic dispatch because startup/shutdown decisions, ramping, minimum up/down time, reserve deliverability, initial conditions, and cost curves couple one period to the next.
Keep These Concepts Separate
For each thermal unit g and period t:
u[g, t] # commitment/on status, binary
start[g, t] # startup transition, binary
stop[g, t] # shutdown transition, binary
p[g, t] # production variable: know whether actual MW or above-minimum MW
r[g, t] # scheduled reserve
Reports often require actual MW output. Many UC models internally use output above minimum:
actual_output = pmin[g] * u[g, t] + p_above_min[g, t]
p_above_min = actual_output - pmin[g] * u[g, t]
Do not mix these conventions in ramping, reserve, cost, or reporting.
Core Feasibility Checks
Before reporting a schedule, independently verify:
- every resource appears exactly once and all time-series have length
T; - commitment, startup, and shutdown are binary;
- offline thermal units have zero production and zero reserve;
- online thermal units respect min/max output;
- must-run units are online when required;
- startup/shutdown indicators match commitment transitions;
- demand balance holds in every period;
- renewable output stays within period-specific bounds;
- scheduled reserve meets the system requirement;
- reserve is deliverable under headroom, startup/shutdown capability, and ramp limits;
- minimum up/down time and initial conditions are respected;
- cost and summary fields are recomputed from arrays.
Transition Logic
Link startup/shutdown to commitment and the initial state:
prev_u = initial_on[g] if t == 0 else u[g, t - 1]
u[g, t] - prev_u == start[g, t] - stop[g, t]
start[g, t] + stop[g, t] <= 1
Equivalent validation pattern:
prev_on = initial_on[g]
for t in range(T):
assert start[g, t] == int(u[g, t] == 1 and prev_on == 0)
assert stop[g, t] == int(u[g, t] == 0 and prev_on == 1)
prev_on = u[g, t]
Capacity And Offline Zeroes
For actual-MW production:
pmin[g] * u[g, t] <= production[g, t] <= pmax[g] * u[g, t]
0 <= reserve[g, t]
For above-minimum production:
cap = pmax[g] - pmin[g]
0 <= p_above_min[g, t] <= cap * u[g, t]
0 <= reserve[g, t]
If u[g, t] == 0, both production and reserve must be zero.
Demand, Renewables, And System Reserve
Use the task's system/zone/network convention. For a single-zone system:
thermal_gen = sum(actual_thermal[g, t] for g in thermal_units)
renew_gen = sum(renewable_output[r, t] for r in renewable_units)
assert abs(thermal_gen + renew_gen - demand[t]) <= tol
assert sum(reserve[g, t] for g in thermal_units) >= reserve_requirement[t] - tol
Renewables:
renewable_min[r, t] <= renewable_output[r, t] <= renewable_max[r, t]
If min equals max, output is fixed. If curtailment is allowed, output may be below max. Do not count renewable headroom as spinning reserve unless the prompt explicitly allows it.
Reserve Deliverability
Reserve is not just unused nameplate capacity. Production and reserve compete for the same physical capability, and reserve must be deployable.
Headroom-only checks are too weak:
# Not enough by itself:
reserve[g, t] <= pmax[g] - production[g, t]
reserve[g, t] <= ramp_up[g]
Use joint production-plus-reserve checks. With actual-MW production:
production[g, t] + reserve[g, t] <= pmax[g] * u[g, t]
With above-minimum production:
p_above_min[g, t] + reserve[g, t] <= (pmax[g] - pmin[g]) * u[g, t]
Startup capability can tighten the startup period. If startup_limit is maximum total output during startup:
if start[g, t] == 1:
production[g, t] + reserve[g, t] <= startup_limit[g]
A linear above-minimum pattern is:
startup_reduction = max(pmax[g] - startup_limit[g], 0.0)
p_above_min[g, t] + reserve[g, t] <= (
(pmax[g] - pmin[g]) * u[g, t]
- startup_reduction * start[g, t]
)
Apply analogous shutdown-period or pre-shutdown capability rules when the data and prompt require them.
Ramping
Use initial output/status for the first period. When reserve must be deliverable, ramp-up usually applies to production plus reserve:
previous = initial_above_min[g] if t == 0 else p_above_min[g, t - 1]
p_above_min[g, t] + reserve[g, t] - previous <= ramp_up[g]
previous - p_above_min[g, t] <= ramp_down[g]
If your model uses actual production, convert consistently before applying above-minimum ramp checks. Recheck ramping after any dispatch or repair step.
Minimum Up/Down Time
Minimum up/down constraints are time-window constraints triggered by starts/stops. Validation pattern:
if start[g, t] == 1:
for tau in range(t, min(T, t + min_up[g])):
assert u[g, tau] == 1
if stop[g, t] == 1:
for tau in range(t, min(T, t + min_down[g])):
assert u[g, tau] == 0
Account for pre-horizon time already on/off. Follow the prompt on whether post-horizon obligations are enforced.
Startup Costs
Startup cost may depend on prior offline duration. A common tier rule is largest lag not exceeding prior offline duration:
def choose_startup_cost(tiers, offline_duration):
tiers = sorted(tiers, key=lambda z: z["lag"])
chosen = tiers[0]
for tier in tiers:
if tier["lag"] <= offline_duration:
chosen = tier
else:
break
return chosen["cost"]
Update offline duration from initial status and the commitment trajectory. Be careful: duration should describe time offline before the startup period.
Production Costs
Use only cost components present in the data or required by the prompt. Do not invent no-load, reserve, curtailment, shutdown, or ramping costs.
For total-cost breakpoints:
def total_cost_from_curve(points, output_mw):
pts = sorted((p["mw"], p["cost"]) for p in points)
if output_mw <= pts[0][0]:
return pts[0][1]
if output_mw >= pts[-1][0]:
return pts[-1][1]
for (x0, y0), (x1, y1) in zip(pts, pts[1:]):
if x0 <= output_mw <= x1:
return y0 + (output_mw - x0) * (y1 - y0) / (x1 - x0)
raise ValueError("output outside curve")
If the first point is at minimum output, its cost may represent online minimum-output cost. Do not add another fixed online cost unless the data says so.
Implementation Workflow
- Parse and normalize resource/time arrays.
- Choose actual-output or above-minimum internal variables and stick to it.
- Include hard feasibility constraints before optimizing cost.
- Extract the solution into the report convention.
- Run independent validation on extracted arrays.
- Recompute costs and summaries from arrays.
- Write
"pass"checks only after validation passes.
Common Pitfalls
- Treating UC as independent hourly dispatch.
- Counting reserve from offline units or renewable headroom.
- Checking reserve headroom but forgetting startup or ramp deliverability.
- Ignoring initial output in first-period ramping.
- Ignoring initial on/off duration in minimum up/down constraints.
- Trusting a repair LP that omits a constraint family.
- Hard-coding
"pass"fields before validation.
Related Skills
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
design
130.2kComprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini, Atlas Cloud, or MuAPI AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG…
ui-ux-pro-max
130.2kUI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
