SkillAgentSearch skills...

unit-commitment-data-modeling

Use for parsing structured unit commitment input data from JSON, CSV, benchmark cases, spreadsheets, databases, or nested tables; finding fields for time periods, resources, load, reserve, generator limits, initial conditions, startup data, renewable availability, and production costs without assumi…

Install / Use

npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill unit-commitment-data-modeling

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

92/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of unit-commitment-data-modeling

unit-commitment-data-modeling scores 92/100 on our quality scale, 128th of 491 Data & Analytics skills we index (top 27%).

Its SKILL.md is 6.8 KB long, well organised into 11 sections with 6 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 1,813 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
14/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so unit-commitment-data-modeling is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.

Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-02. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

unit-commitment-data-modeling compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than unit-commitment-data-modeling; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
unit-commitment-data-modeling (this skill)by benchflow-ai921.8k2mo agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k9d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k9d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k11d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k11d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install unit-commitment-data-modeling?
Run npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill unit-commitment-data-modeling. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does unit-commitment-data-modeling work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is unit-commitment-data-modeling safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is unit-commitment-data-modeling still maintained?
The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so unit-commitment-data-modeling is actively maintained.

name: unit-commitment-data-modeling description: Use for parsing structured unit commitment input data from JSON, CSV, benchmark cases, spreadsheets, databases, or nested tables; finding fields for time periods, resources, load, reserve, generator limits, initial conditions, startup data, renewable availability, and production costs without assuming one source-specific schema.

Unit Commitment Structured Data Parsing

Use this skill when a unit commitment task provides structured data and you need to map fields into UC concepts. The source may be JSON, CSV, spreadsheets, database tables, or nested dictionaries. The prompt and schema are the source of truth; do not assume one benchmark or package.

Parsing Workflow

  1. Load data with structured parsers: JSON as objects, CSV/sheets as tables, databases as query results.
  2. Inspect schema: top-level keys, tables/sheets, resource groups, time-series fields, cost curves, startup tiers, and initial-condition fields.
  3. Identify the time axis: number of periods, labels, duration, and report convention.
  4. Identify resource sets: thermal, renewable, storage, imports, zones, reserve products, or network objects.
  5. Normalize fields into arrays/tables with explicit shapes.
  6. Preserve original names and source ordering for final reports.
  7. Run parser-level checks before modeling.

Map Concepts, Not Names

Different sources use different names. Map by meaning, units, shape, and context.

| UC concept | Look for | | --- | --- | | Horizon | periods, hours, timestamps, interval count | | Demand | load, system demand, net load, zone load | | Reserve requirement | spinning, operating, contingency, regulation reserve | | Resource sets | thermal, renewable, storage, import/export | | Commitment status | on/off, online, active, unit status | | Output limits | minimum stable output, maximum output, availability | | Ramping | ramp up/down, startup capability, shutdown capability | | Minimum up/down | required duration after start/stop | | Initial conditions | initial status, initial output, time already on/off | | Must-run | forced online, fixed status | | Startup data | fixed costs or tiers by prior offline duration | | Production cost | linear coefficients, heat rate, piecewise or total-cost curves | | Renewable availability | hourly min/max output or forecast bounds |

Common Data Shapes

  • Scalar by resource: min up/down, ramp rates, startup ramp, must-run.
  • Time series by system/zone: demand and reserve requirement.
  • Time series by resource: renewable availability or outage status.
  • Curve/tier tables: startup costs and production-cost breakpoints.
  • Nested resource objects: generator-specific limits, status, and costs.

Normalize into a small representation:

case = {
    "periods": periods,                  # length T
    "thermal_names": thermal_names,      # length G, source order
    "renewable_names": renewable_names,  # length R, source order
    "demand": demand,                    # shape (T,)
    "reserve_requirement": reserve,       # shape (T,)
    "thermal": thermal_params,
    "renewable_min": renewable_min,       # shape (R, T)
    "renewable_max": renewable_max,       # shape (R, T)
}

Time, Ordering, And Units

  • Use the input horizon as authoritative.
  • Preserve source period order.
  • Keep zero-based internal indexes separate from one-based/timestamped report labels.
  • Verify every time-series length equals T.
  • Preserve resource order unless the prompt requires sorting.
  • Treat resource IDs as opaque strings.
  • Keep thermal and renewable sets separate when constraints differ.
  • Check power units, period duration, ramp-rate units, and cost units before converting anything.

Basic checks:

assert len(demand) == T
assert len(reserve_requirement) == T
for r in renewable_resources:
    assert len(r["min"]) == T
    assert len(r["max"]) == T

Production Convention

Many UC models use output above minimum internally, while reports often require actual MW.

actual_output = pmin * commitment + output_above_min
output_above_min = actual_output - pmin * commitment

Pick one internal convention and convert carefully for reporting, ramping, reserve deliverability, and cost.

Startup Tiers

Startup tiers are usually keyed by prior offline duration. Parse thresholds and costs without assuming order.

def choose_startup_tier(tiers, prior_offline_duration):
    tiers = sorted(tiers, key=lambda x: x["lag"])
    chosen = tiers[0]
    for tier in tiers:
        if tier["lag"] <= prior_offline_duration:
            chosen = tier
        else:
            break
    return chosen

Keep prior offline duration consistent with initial status and transition timing.

Cost Curves

Identify whether points are total cost, marginal cost, incremental segment cost, or heat-rate data. For total-cost breakpoints:

def interpolate_total_cost(points, output_mw):
    pts = sorted((float(p["mw"]), float(p["cost"])) for p in points)
    if output_mw <= pts[0][0]:
        return pts[0][1]
    if output_mw >= pts[-1][0]:
        return pts[-1][1]
    for (x0, y0), (x1, y1) in zip(pts, pts[1:]):
        if x0 <= output_mw <= x1:
            a = (output_mw - x0) / (x1 - x0)
            return y0 + a * (y1 - y0)
    raise ValueError("output outside cost curve")

If the first point is at minimum output, it may represent online minimum-output cost. Do not invent additional no-load or shutdown costs unless provided.

Renewables

  • Parse hourly minimum and maximum output.
  • If min equals max, output is fixed in that period.
  • If curtailment is allowed, output can be anywhere between min and max.
  • Do not count renewable headroom as spinning reserve unless explicitly allowed.
  • Renewable cost is zero unless the task/data says otherwise.

Parser-Level Validation

Before solving, check:

assert np.all(np.isfinite(demand))
assert np.all(np.isfinite(reserve_requirement))
assert np.all(thermal_pmin <= thermal_pmax)
assert np.all(renewable_min <= renewable_max)
assert all(len(curve) >= 2 for curve in production_curves.values())
assert all(len(tiers) >= 1 for tiers in startup_tiers.values())

Also check missing required fields, duplicate IDs, mismatched lengths, negative impossible limits, repeated cost points, nonmonotone startup lags, and inconsistent initial status/output.

Common Mistakes

  • Hard-coding a familiar schema instead of inspecting the data.
  • Losing ordering when converting dictionaries or tables into arrays.
  • Joining tables on the wrong key or duplicating resources.
  • Confusing total output with output above minimum.
  • Confusing reserve, capacity, availability, and dispatch.
  • Treating every cost curve as marginal cost.
  • Ignoring startup tier lags or initial offline duration.
  • Assuming renewable maximum output must always be used.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.8k
CategoryData
Updated2mo ago
Forks368

Languages

PDDL

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions