SkillAgentSearch skills...

testing-python

Write and evaluate effective Python tests using pytest

Install / Use

npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill testing-python

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

83/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of testing-python

testing-python scores 83/100 on our quality scale, 697th of 1,028 Content & Media skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 5.2 KB long, well organised into 29 sections with 12 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 1,813 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
20/20
Description
8/15
Adoption
14/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so testing-python is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

testing-python compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than testing-python; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
testing-python (this skill)by benchflow-ai831.8k2mo agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.9k15d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.2ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10084.9ktodayMCP Server
crawl4aiby unclecode10084.6k6d agoMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install testing-python?
Run npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill testing-python. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does testing-python work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is testing-python safe to use?
It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is testing-python still maintained?
The repository was last updated about 2 months ago, so testing-python is actively maintained.

name: testing-python description: Write and evaluate effective Python tests using pytest. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, debugging test failures, or improving test coverage. Covers test design, fixtures, parameterization, mocking, and async testing.

Writing Effective Python Tests

Core Principles

Every test should be atomic, self-contained, and test single functionality. A test that tests multiple things is harder to debug and maintain.

Test Structure

Atomic unit tests

Each test should verify a single behavior. The test name should tell you what's broken when it fails. Multiple assertions are fine when they all verify the same behavior.

# Good: Name tells you what's broken
def test_user_creation_sets_defaults():
    user = User(name="Alice")
    assert user.role == "member"
    assert user.id is not None
    assert user.created_at is not None

# Bad: If this fails, what behavior is broken?
def test_user():
    user = User(name="Alice")
    assert user.role == "member"
    user.promote()
    assert user.role == "admin"
    assert user.can_delete_others()

Use parameterization for variations of the same concept

import pytest

@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
    ("hello", "HELLO"),
    ("World", "WORLD"),
    ("", ""),
    ("123", "123"),
])
def test_uppercase_conversion(input, expected):
    assert input.upper() == expected

Use separate tests for different functionality

Don't parameterize unrelated behaviors. If the test logic differs, write separate tests.

Project-Specific Rules

No async markers needed

This project uses asyncio_mode = "auto" globally. Write async tests without decorators:

# Correct
async def test_async_operation():
    result = await some_async_function()
    assert result == expected

# Wrong - don't add this
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_async_operation():
    ...

Imports at module level

Put ALL imports at the top of the file:

# Correct
import pytest
from fastmcp import FastMCP
from fastmcp.client import Client

async def test_something():
    mcp = FastMCP("test")
    ...

# Wrong - no local imports
async def test_something():
    from fastmcp import FastMCP  # Don't do this
    ...

Use in-memory transport for testing

Pass FastMCP servers directly to clients:

from fastmcp import FastMCP
from fastmcp.client import Client

mcp = FastMCP("TestServer")

@mcp.tool
def greet(name: str) -> str:
    return f"Hello, {name}!"

async def test_greet_tool():
    async with Client(mcp) as client:
        result = await client.call_tool("greet", {"name": "World"})
        assert result[0].text == "Hello, World!"

Only use HTTP transport when explicitly testing network features.

Inline snapshots for complex data

Use inline-snapshot for testing JSON schemas and complex structures:

from inline_snapshot import snapshot

def test_schema_generation():
    schema = generate_schema(MyModel)
    assert schema == snapshot()  # Will auto-populate on first run

Commands:

  • pytest --inline-snapshot=create - populate empty snapshots
  • pytest --inline-snapshot=fix - update after intentional changes

Fixtures

Prefer function-scoped fixtures

@pytest.fixture
def client():
    return Client()

async def test_with_client(client):
    result = await client.ping()
    assert result is not None

Use tmp_path for file operations

def test_file_writing(tmp_path):
    file = tmp_path / "test.txt"
    file.write_text("content")
    assert file.read_text() == "content"

Mocking

Mock at the boundary

from unittest.mock import patch, AsyncMock

async def test_external_api_call():
    with patch("mymodule.external_client.fetch", new_callable=AsyncMock) as mock:
        mock.return_value = {"data": "test"}
        result = await my_function()
        assert result == {"data": "test"}

Don't mock what you own

Test your code with real implementations when possible. Mock external services, not internal classes.

Test Naming

Use descriptive names that explain the scenario:

# Good
def test_login_fails_with_invalid_password():
def test_user_can_update_own_profile():
def test_admin_can_delete_any_user():

# Bad
def test_login():
def test_update():
def test_delete():

Error Testing

import pytest

def test_raises_on_invalid_input():
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="must be positive"):
        calculate(-1)

async def test_async_raises():
    with pytest.raises(ConnectionError):
        await connect_to_invalid_host()

Running Tests

uv run pytest -n auto              # Run all tests in parallel
uv run pytest -n auto -x           # Stop on first failure
uv run pytest path/to/test.py      # Run specific file
uv run pytest -k "test_name"       # Run tests matching pattern
uv run pytest -m "not integration" # Exclude integration tests

Checklist

Before submitting tests:

  • [ ] Each test tests one thing
  • [ ] No @pytest.mark.asyncio decorators
  • [ ] Imports at module level
  • [ ] Descriptive test names
  • [ ] Using in-memory transport (not HTTP) unless testing networking
  • [ ] Parameterization for variations of same behavior
  • [ ] Separate tests for different behaviors

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.8k
CategoryContent
Updated2mo ago
Forks368

Languages

PDDL

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions