SkillAgentSearch skills...

procoder

Senior-developer discipline for AI coding agents. A commit gate that counts unchecked as failing, quality controllers that refuse to call unfinished work done, and a lessons loop that closes each escaped bug's class. One Go binary, no runtime deps, works with 20+ agents.

Install / Use

npx skills add azrtydxb/procoder

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📦

Other

Other agent config

Quality Score

87/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Claude Code

Our assessment of procoder

procoder scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 617th of 1,081 Security skills we index.

Its Other is 8.9 KB long, well organised into 9 sections with 3 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 211 GitHub stars, a meaningful sign that others use it.

Substance
29/30
Structure
18/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
10/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so procoder is actively maintained.
  • Our last check on 2026-09-28 found the source still online.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.

AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-09-24. Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-24. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

procoder compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than procoder; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
procoder (this skill)by azrtydxb872116d agoOther
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10090.8k19d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10074.4ktodayCLAUDE.md
CowAgentby zhayujie10047.2ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10085.6ktodayMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install procoder?
Run npx skills add azrtydxb/procoder. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does procoder work with?
It is written for Claude Code, as a Other file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is procoder safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is procoder still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so procoder is actively maintained.
<p align="center"> <img src="docs/assets/banner.png" alt="Procoder — senior dev wisdom, automated" width="100%"> </p>

Make your AI coder work like a senior developer. One Go binary gives the agent a commit gate it cannot talk its way past, quality controllers that refuse to call unfinished work done, and a self-learning loop that turns every escaped bug into a permanently closed class. The agent stays in control — nothing ever touches your code behind its back.

CI Version License Agents

Quick start

/plugin marketplace add azrtydxb/procoder
/plugin install procoder
/procoder:init          # installs the tools this repository needs

That's Claude Code; Procoder also ships adapters for every agent — Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Kilo Code, Roo, Kiro, Codex CLI, Copilot CLI, Gemini, OpenCode, and anything that reads AGENTS.md. See Every agent.

Before / after

Without Procoder, "done" is whatever the agent last said. With it, done has to survive the gate — this is a real run, verbatim, on a demo repo with an unformatted file, a conflict marker, and a staged junk file:

$ procoder check
unformatted  main.go  (run `procoder format "main.go"` for the result)
BLOCKING     notes.md:1  merge conflict marker left in the file
BLOCKING     notes.md:5  merge conflict marker left in the file
BLOCKING     .DS_Store  junk file staged — caches and garbage never belong in a commit
...
procoder gate: 0 clean, 2 unformatted, 0 unchecked, 1 out of scope, 8 hygiene finding(s) (3 blocking)

The agent gets the findings and the fixed content in the same turn; the binary never edits a file itself. And a tool that failed is never reported as clean — "unchecked" counts as failing, said out loud.

How it works

agent writes code ──► hook fires ──► binary computes findings
        ▲                                    │
        └──── agent reviews and implements ◄─┘

Two modes, one principle:

  • Self-serve — tools the agent runs itself: check, format, lint, scan, query the index, audit the tree.
  • Forced — hooks at fixed lifecycle points (every write, every session start) the agent cannot skip.
  • P-CONTROL — the binary computes and reports; the agent acts. Nothing modifies code, files, or state behind the agent's back.

What's inside

The commit gate (procoder check) — formatting across the popular languages (Go, Python, JS/TS/HTML/CSS, Rust, C/C++, Java, Kotlin, Swift, Ruby, Dart, C#, shell — one canonical formatter each, the project's config always wins), git hygiene (conflict markers, junk, oversized files, AI-attribution lines), secrets, lint, ci and infra hygiene, and documentation health, all through one code path so check, git, and CI can never disagree.

The quality chain — thinking before code, with a refusing controller at every link: a spec interview closes design gaps before anything is built (spec check blocks while sections are missing or questions open), a plan turns the spec into tasks an engineer with zero context could execute (plan check blocks placeholders), a backlog holds larger projects as milestones → epics → user stories seeded from specs and worked in scope-boxed sprints (one active sprint, explicit carry-over, closes that refuse), and a todo list tracks standalone work (todo close refuses until every acceptance criterion is checked, evidence is recorded, and the gate is clean — story closes carry the same rigor).

The self-learning loop — a pre-PR self-review catches reviewer-class findings before a PR exists; anything that still escapes becomes a lessons ledger entry whose adaptation (a linter rule, a rubric line, a pinning test) must land before the work counts as done. Downstream bot reviewers are the fallback net, not the net — and what that net catches is not lost either: procoder copilot-leak collects GitHub Copilot's auto-review findings, strips every trace of your code from them, and — only after you say yes on a terminal — files them as issues and records them as unlearned until someone writes the adaptation that closes the class.

The test domain — procoder test runs the repository's real suite with each ecosystem's canonical runner (go test, cargo test, the package.json test script, pytest, gradle/maven): PASS with counts, FAIL with the failing tests named, and NOT run, which is never the same as green. Coverage is reported where the runner measures it natively and never enforced. Set [test] policy = "block" and a green suite becomes part of "done" — the closes refuse while it is red or unverifiable.

The release controller — procoder release is the last refusal before a tag: the version in sync across every file you list, the changelog entry present, the tree clean, the gate clean, the suite green. Every failure arrives in one list, and on success the git tag command is printed for you to run. Procoder tags nothing itself.

The ten domains — security (gitleaks, semgrep, osv-scanner), best practices (lint with curated baselines), maintainability (dead code, complexity, plus deps freshness per ecosystem), performance (bench against a saved baseline — Go only, said out loud), documentation (broken refs, drift, diagrams, badges, adr decision records, this very README's completeness), clean code (formatting), testing, ci (pinned actions, timeouts), infra (Docker, Terraform, Kubernetes, Helm), and GitOps discipline.

The code index — ctags + SCIP, the agent's fast map: find, refs, callers, impact, unused, entrypoints.

Senior habits, encoded — engineering principles injected at session start (build ladder: reuse → stdlib → platform → minimum code; delegation: parallel subagents under a contract, watched and judged; ADHD/ASD-friendly formatting for complex answers — problem cards, decisions surfaced, noise filtered; all repo-overridable), deliberate corner-cuts marked and harvested as debt with revisit triggers, and an audit command that onboards any existing codebase with a triaged scorecard.

Replaces the plugins you are already running

Procoder absorbed three earlier tools, and running them alongside it means two sets of instructions competing for the same agent:

  • superpowers — plans for an engineer with zero context, spike/bounded/architectural classification, evidence before "done", systematic debugging, TDD with the mutation check. All of it here, with controllers that refuse where the originals advised.
  • ponytail — the build ladder, the debt: marker convention, the five-tag over-engineering review, one instruction file serving every agent.
  • serena — symbol-level navigation, cross-file rename, interface implementations, project memory. Now procoder index and .procoder/, with no MCP server to keep running. Serena's symbol-level write tools are deliberately not adopted: the binary computes the rename and hands you the diff.

Full provenance map, including where the serena replacement stops: Influences.

Configuration

Everything Procoder owns lives in .procoder/ — plain files, made to be edited, and the repo's version always wins over the built-in default: config.toml (policies, thresholds), PRINCIPLES.md, the github templates, the docs/security rules, the review rubric, the lessons ledger. Full reference: Configuration.

The docs

The full story lives on the site, organised the way the Divio documentation system splits it: the tutorial (Getting started), the how-to guides (Ship a change), the reference (every command), and the explanation (the quality chain, how it's built).

What the reports mean

A file that could not be checked is never called clean. A task without fresh verification evidence cannot close. This README is held to a completeness check — a feature family it stops mentioning blocks the gate. No benchmark numbers appear here because none have been run; any future number will carry its method alongside it.

Implementation

One Go binary, no runtime dependencies, cross-compiled per platform into dist/ and committed with the plugin — no npm, no network at hook time, air-gapped included. go test ./... to develop; the design contract lives in the docs and supersedes anything here that drifts from it.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars211
CategorySecurity
Updated6d ago
Forks19

Languages

Go

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions
procoder — Other: Install & Safety Check | SkillAgent