SkillAgentSearch skills...

competitive-brief

Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats

Install / Use

npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill competitive-brief

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

89/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Tags

Our assessment of competitive-brief

competitive-brief scores 89/100 on our quality scale, 94th of 187 Communication skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 13 KB long, well organised into 50 sections and no code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 25,526 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
13/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
19/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so competitive-brief is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

competitive-brief compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than competitive-brief; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
competitive-brief (this skill)by anthropics8925.5k2d agoSKILL.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k5d agoSKILL.md
ui-ux-pro-maxby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k5d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install competitive-brief?
Run npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill competitive-brief. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does competitive-brief work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is competitive-brief safe to use?
It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is competitive-brief still maintained?
The repository was last updated 2 days ago, so competitive-brief is actively maintained.

name: competitive-brief description: Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact. argument-hint: "<competitor or market segment>"

Competitive Brief

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Research competitors and generate a structured competitive analysis comparing positioning, messaging, content strategy, and market presence.

Trigger

User runs /competitive-brief or asks for a competitive analysis, competitor research, or market comparison.

Inputs

Gather the following from the user:

  1. Competitor name(s) — one or more competitors to analyze (required)

  2. Your company/product context (optional but recommended):

    • What you sell and to whom
    • Your positioning or value proposition
    • Key differentiators you want to highlight
  3. Focus areas (optional — if not specified, cover all):

    • Messaging and positioning
    • Product and feature comparison
    • Content and thought leadership strategy
    • Recent announcements and news
    • Pricing and packaging (if publicly available)
    • Market presence and audience

Research Process

For each competitor, research using web search:

  1. Company website — homepage messaging, product pages, about page, pricing page
  2. Recent news — press releases, funding announcements, product launches, partnerships (last 6 months)
  3. Content strategy — blog topics, resource types, social media presence, webinars, podcasts
  4. Review sites and comparisons — third-party comparisons, analyst mentions, customer review themes
  5. Job postings — hiring signals that indicate strategic direction (optional)

Research Sources

Gather intelligence from these categories of sources:

Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor)

  • Website: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers
  • Blog and resource center: content themes, publishing frequency, depth
  • Social media profiles: messaging, engagement, content strategy
  • Product demos and free trials: UX, features, onboarding experience
  • Webinars and events: topics, speakers, audience engagement
  • Press releases and newsroom: announcements, partnerships, milestones
  • Job postings: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities (e.g., hiring for a new product line or market)

Secondary Sources (Third-Party)

  • Review sites: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt — customer sentiment themes
  • Analyst reports: Gartner, Forrester, IDC — market positioning and category placement
  • News coverage: TechCrunch, industry publications — funding, partnerships, narrative
  • Social listening: mentions, sentiment, share of voice across social platforms
  • SEO tools: keyword rankings, organic traffic estimates, content gaps
  • Financial filings: revenue, growth rate, investment areas (for public companies)
  • Community forums: community forums (e.g. Reddit, Discourse), industry chat groups (e.g. Slack communities) — user sentiment

Research Cadence

  • Deep competitive analysis: quarterly (full research across all sources)
  • Competitive monitoring: monthly (scan for new announcements, content, messaging changes)
  • Real-time alerts: ongoing (set up alerts for competitor brand mentions, press, job postings)

Competitive Brief Structure

1. Executive Summary

  • 2-3 sentence overview of the competitive landscape
  • Key takeaway: your biggest opportunity and biggest threat

2. Competitor Profiles

For each competitor:

Company Overview

  • What they do (one-sentence positioning)
  • Target audience
  • Company size/stage indicators (funding, employee count if available)
  • Key recent developments

Messaging Analysis

  • Primary tagline or headline
  • Core value proposition
  • Key messaging themes (3-5)
  • Tone and voice characterization
  • How they describe the problem they solve

Product/Solution Positioning

  • How they categorize their product
  • Key features they emphasize
  • Claimed differentiators
  • Pricing approach (if publicly available)

Content Strategy

  • Blog frequency and topics
  • Content types produced (ebooks, webinars, case studies, tools)
  • Social media presence and engagement approach
  • Thought leadership themes
  • SEO strategy observations (what terms they appear to target)

Strengths

  • What they do well
  • Where their messaging resonates
  • Competitive advantages

Weaknesses

  • Gaps in their messaging or positioning
  • Areas where they are vulnerable
  • Customer complaints or criticism themes (from reviews)

3. Messaging Comparison Matrix

| Dimension | Your Company | Competitor A | Competitor B | |-----------|-------------|--------------|--------------| | Primary tagline | ... | ... | ... | | Target buyer | ... | ... | ... | | Key differentiator | ... | ... | ... | | Tone/voice | ... | ... | ... | | Core value prop | ... | ... | ... |

(Include user's company only if they provided their positioning context)

4. Content Gap Analysis

  • Topics your competitors cover that you do not (or vice versa)
  • Content formats they use that you could adopt
  • Keywords or themes they own vs. opportunities they have missed

5. Opportunities

  • Positioning gaps you can exploit
  • Messaging angles your competitors have not claimed
  • Audience segments they are underserving
  • Content or channel opportunities

6. Threats

  • Areas where competitors are strong and you are vulnerable
  • Trends that favor their positioning
  • Recent moves that could shift the market

7. Recommended Actions

  • 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on the analysis
  • Quick wins (things you can act on this week)
  • Strategic moves (longer-term positioning or content investments)

Analysis Frameworks

Messaging Comparison Frameworks

Value Proposition Comparison

For each competitor, document:

  • Promise: what they promise the customer will achieve
  • Evidence: how they prove the promise (data, testimonials, demos)
  • Mechanism: how their product delivers on the promise (the "how it works")
  • Uniqueness: what they claim only they can do

Narrative Analysis

Identify each competitor's story arc:

  • Villain: what problem or enemy they position against (status quo, legacy tools, complexity)
  • Hero: who is the hero in their story (the customer? the product? the team?)
  • Transformation: what before/after do they promise?
  • Stakes: what happens if you do not act?

This reveals positioning strategy and emotional appeals.

Messaging Strengths and Vulnerabilities

For each competitor's messaging, assess:

  • Clarity: can a first-time visitor understand what they do in 5 seconds?
  • Differentiation: is their positioning distinct or generic?
  • Proof: do they back up claims with evidence?
  • Consistency: is messaging consistent across channels?
  • Resonance: does their messaging address real customer pain points?

Content Gap Analysis Methodology

Content Audit Comparison

Map content across competitors by:

| Topic/Theme | Your Content | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? | |-------------|-------------|--------------|--------------|------| | [Topic 1] | Blog post, ebook | Blog series, webinar | Nothing | Opportunity for B | | [Topic 2] | Nothing | Whitepaper | Blog post, video | Gap for you | | [Topic 3] | Case study | Nothing | Case study | Parity |

Content Type Coverage

| Content Format | You | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C | |----------------|-----|--------|--------|--------| | Blog posts | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Case studies | Y | Y | N | Y | | Ebooks/Whitepapers | N | Y | Y | N | | Webinars | Y | Y | Y | N | | Podcast | N | N | Y | N | | Video content | N | Y | Y | Y | | Interactive tools | N | N | N | Y | | Templates/Resources | Y | N | Y | N |

Identifying Content Opportunities

  1. Topics they cover that you do not: potential gaps in your content strategy
  2. Topics you cover that they do not: potential differentiators to amplify
  3. Formats they use that you do not: format gaps that could reach new audiences
  4. Audience segments they address that you do not: underserved audiences
  5. Search terms they rank for that you do not: SEO content gaps

Content Quality Assessment

  • Depth: surface-level or comprehensive?
  • Freshness: regularly updated or stale?
  • Engagement: do posts get comments, shares, links?
  • Production value: text-only or multimedia?
  • Thought leadership: original insights or rehashed content?

Positioning Strategy

Positioning Statement Framework

For your company and each competitor, define (or reverse-engineer) their positioning statement:

For [target audience], [product/company] is the [category] that [key benefit/differentiator] because [reason to believe].

Example:

For mid-market SaaS marketing teams, Acme is the campaign management platform that unifies planning and execution in one workspace because it is built on a single data model that eliminates tool fragmentation.

Positioning Map

Plot competitors on a 2x2 matrix using the two most important dimensions for your market:

Common axis pairs:

  • Price vs. Capability (low cost / basic vs. premium / full-featured)
  • Ease of Use vs. Power (simple / limited vs. complex / flexible)
  • SMB Focus vs. Enterprise Focus (self-serve / individual vs. sales-led / team)
  • Point Solution vs. Platform (does one thing well vs. does many things)
  • Innovative vs. Established (new approach vs. proven track record)

Identify which quadrant is underserved or where your differentiation is strongest.

Category Strategy

  • Create a new category: if you do something genuinely different, define and own the category (high risk, high reward)
  • Reframe the existing category: change how buyers evaluate the category to favor your strengths
  • Win the existing category: compete directly on recognized criteria and out-execute
  • Niche within the category: own a specific segment, use case, or audience

Positioning Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Positioning against a competitor rather than for a customer need
  • Claiming too many differentiators (pick 1-2 that matter most)
  • Using category jargon the customer does not use
  • Positioning on features rather than outcomes
  • Changing positioning too frequently (confuses the market)

Battlecard Creation

A competitive battlecard is a one-page reference for sales and marketing teams. Include:

Header

  • Competitor name and logo
  • Last updated date
  • Competitive win rate (if tracked)

Quick Overview

  • What they do (one sentence)
  • Their target customer
  • Pricing model summary
  • Key recent developments

Their Pitch

  • How they describe themselves
  • Their primary tagline
  • Their top 3 claimed differentiators

Strengths (Be Honest)

  • Where they genuinely compete well
  • What customers like about them (from reviews)
  • Features or capabilities where they lead

Weaknesses

  • Consistent customer complaints (from reviews)
  • Technical limitations
  • Gaps in their offering
  • Areas where customers report dissatisfaction

Our Differentiators

  • 3-5 specific ways your product or approach is different
  • For each: the differentiator, why it matters to the customer, and proof

Objection Handling

| If the prospect says... | Respond with... | |------------------------|----------------| | "[Competitor] does X too" | "Here is how our approach differs..." | | "[Competitor] is cheaper" | "Here is what that price difference gets you..." | | "I've heard good things about [Competitor]" | "They are strong at X. Where we differ is..." |

Landmines to Set

Questions to ask prospects early that highlight you

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars25.5k
CategoryCommunication
Updated2d ago
Forks3.0k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions