SkillAgentSearch skills...

offensive-initial-access

Initial access techniques checklist: phishing (spear/smishing), credential stuffing, exposed service exploitation, supply chain attacks, watering hole, VPN/RDP brute force, public-facing application exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK TA0001.

Install / Use

npx skills add SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-initial-access

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Category

Security

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of offensive-initial-access

offensive-initial-access scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 421st of 653 Security skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 64 KB long, well organised into 128 sections with 19 code examples: long enough that it reads more like full documentation than a focused instruction file, which agents can find harder to follow.

With 6,850 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
21/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
16/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so offensive-initial-access is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

offensive-initial-access compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than offensive-initial-access; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
offensive-initial-access (this skill)by SnailSploit876.8k6d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10085.5k11d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k4d agoSKILL.md
designby nextlevelbuilder100130.2k5d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install offensive-initial-access?
Run npx skills add SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-initial-access. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does offensive-initial-access work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is offensive-initial-access safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is offensive-initial-access still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so offensive-initial-access is actively maintained.

SKILL: Modern Initial Access

Metadata

  • Skill Name: initial-access
  • Folder: offensive-initial-access
  • Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/initial-access.md

Description

Initial access techniques checklist: phishing (spear/smishing), credential stuffing, exposed service exploitation, supply chain attacks, watering hole, VPN/RDP brute force, public-facing application exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK TA0001. Use when planning initial access phases of red team engagements.

Trigger Phrases

Use this skill when the conversation involves any of: initial access, phishing, spear phishing, credential stuffing, exposed service, supply chain, watering hole, VPN brute force, RDP attack, MITRE TA0001, initial foothold

Instructions for Claude

When this skill is active:

  1. Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
  2. Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
  3. For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
  4. Track which checklist items have been completed
  5. Suggest next steps based on findings

Full Methodology

Modern Initial Access

Introduction

Typical Initial Access Vectors

  • Email with malware attached/linked
    • Most attacks using attached malware won't work
    • Out of the box protection may not cover PDF, ISO, IMG, HTML, SVG, PPTM, PPSM, ACCDE
    • Most URL-based attacks do work
    • domain's reputation, age, category should be sound
    • domain should use https
    • limit number of GET elements and their names
    • use HTML Smuggling to evade
    • get your domain warmed up (send some legitimate emails first with no attachment and links)
    • Advanced attacks may involve delivering backdoored trusted applications (e.g., older Electron apps with V8 exploits) via phishing to bypass application control like WDAC.
  • Spear-phishing/ phishing / stealing valid credentials
    • Check your mail with Phishious before sending it to your victim
    • use decode-spam-headers to analyze returned SMTP headers
    • Be aware that default Microsoft Office settings now block macros in files downloaded from the internet (marked with MOTW). Success often requires significant social engineering to convince users to bypass these protections or using alternative delivery methods (e.g., containers that don't propagate MOTW, signed add-ins).
    • images and link increase spam score, be wary of it
    • don't use no-reply like usernames
    • send through GoPhis -> AWS SOCAT :587 -> smtp.gmail.com -> @target.com
    • link to websites on trusted domains, like cloud-facing resources
    • make sure your webserver blocks automated bots
  • Deep‑fake voice or video social‑engineering calls (help‑desk or executive impersonation) to obtain password resets or approve MFA prompts. Generative‑AI tools make cloning voices trivial.
  • Business Email Compromise (BEC) / OAuth consent phishing that targets finance or vendor‑portal users, yielding cloud‑token access even where MFA is enabled.
  • Malicious OneNote .one attachments and OneDrive "Add to Shortcut" abuse: embedded HTA/JS payloads bypass Office macro blocking and spread via cloud sync.
  • Excel blocks untrusted Internet-origin XLL add-ins by default (M365, 2023+). Smuggled XLLs inside containers may still be blocked once MOTW propagates.
  • Malicious browser extensions (Chrome, Edge, Firefox) delivered through fake Web Store listings; hijack session cookies or inject scripts into authenticated SaaS sessions.
  • attackers register malicious cloud apps and trick users into granting scopes, giving token-based access that bypasses MFA
  • Reusing stolen credentials against external single factor VPN, gateways, etc
  • Password Spraying against Office365, custom login pages, VPN gateways
  • Exposed RDP with weak credentials and lacking controls
  • Unpatched known vulnerable perimeter device, application bugs, default credentials, etc
  • Rarely HID-emulating USB sticks
  • WiFi Evil Twin -> Route WPA2 Enterprise -> NetNTLMv2 hash cracking -> authenticated network access -> Responder
  • Plugging into on-premises LAN -> Responder/mitm6/Ldaprelayx
  • SEO poisoning / paid‑search malvertising (e.g., fake PuTTY & WinSCP ads, dominant loader delivery 2024–25) and "quishing" PDFs whose QR codes redirect victims to mobile OAuth login pages
  • Consent‑/token‑phishing and Adversary‑in‑the‑Middle (AiTM) proxy kits that steal OAuth session cookies or proxy MFA (e.g., EvilProxy, Tycoon, Dadsec). These vectors bypass MFA by tricking users into granting access to rogue Azure AD / Google Workspace apps.
  • Supply‑chain compromise of developer ecosystems:
    • malicious NPM / PyPI typosquat packages
    • poisoned GitHub Actions or CI/CD secrets exfiltration
    • container‑registry deception (imageless Docker Hub repos or curl | bash installers).
    • First contact often occurs on developer workstations.
  • Mass‑exploited perimeter and edge‑device zero‑days (e.g., Ivanti Connect Secure (such as CVE-2023-46805, CVE-2024-21887), MOVEit Transfer (such as CVE-2023-34362), Citrix Bleed) enabling unauthenticated remote code execution before credentials come into play. Maintain a live "current CVEs exploited‑in‑the‑wild" table and apply virtual patching/WAF rules where upgrades lag.
  • Cloud & Kubernetes misconfigurations:
    • exposed S3 buckets allowing upload‑then‑execute objects
    • SSRF into EC2 IMDSv1 or GCP metadata to steal instance credentials
    • open Kubernetes API/Argo CD dashboards, and leaked Azure SAS tokens that grant cross‑tenant data extraction.
    • OIDC Workload Identity Federation exposed: stolen GKE/EKS service‑account tokens grant cross‑cluster privilege escalation.
    • AWS STS credentials embedded in shareable URLs (GetFederationToken, presigned S3, etc.) leak temporary keys to attackers.
  • Mobile initial‑access vectors:
    • smishing or WhatsApp/Telegram lures
    • QR‑code invoice/resumé phishing that lands on mobile browsers
    • rogue Mobile Device Management (MDM) enrolment profiles granting full device admin.
    • Passkey/WebAuthn phishing pages that spoof the biometric prompt to hijack FIDO sessions.
    • Sideload invitations via fake Apple TestFlight or Test Fairy links deliver malicious iOS/Android apps outside official store review.
  • Collaboration‑app abuse:
    • malicious Microsoft Teams/Slack/Discord apps with overbroad OAuth scopes
    • slash‑command token vacuum
    • SharePoint Framework (SPFx) app sideloading
    • Discord/Telegram CDN links hosting first‑stage binaries.
  • If WinRM over HTTPS (WinRMS, port 5986) is enabled (it's not by default) and its Channel Binding setting remains at the default "Relaxed", it becomes vulnerable to NTLM relay attacks. Relayed credentials (e.g., from coerced HTTP/SMB/LDAP) can grant RCE. Ironically, enabling WinRMS to "harden" a system by disabling HTTP WinRM (port 5985, which is relay-resistant due to internal encryption) can introduce this vulnerability. Key technical details:
    • Standard WinRM (port 5985) uses HTTP with SPNEGO; channel binding is enabled by default, so NTLM relay fails unless the attacker controls TLS.
    • WinRMS (port 5986) runs over HTTPS; if CbtHardeningLevel is not set to Strict, credentials can still be relayed despite TLS.
    • Channel Binding (CBT) can be set to None (disabled), Relaxed (optional), or Strict (required)
    • Mitigation: winrm set winrm/config/service/auth '@{CbtHardeningLevel="Strict"}'
    • Prefer Kerberos or certificate-based auth for WinRM; monitor and reduce NTLM usage.
  • Exploiting misconfigured Power Platform services (e.g., Power Apps with overly permissive shared connections or abusing Power Query for native SQL execution against on-prem data gateways).

Command & Control

  • Use a two-stage Mythic C2 as our command and control
  • Stage one should be lean and hard to detect, it would be used for situational awareness
    • Merlin for Linux (no upstream commits since 2023, still functional)
    • Poseidon + Apfell for macOS
    • Apollo in shellcode form for Windows
      • to get rid of apollo console
      • open it via detect-it-easy, select pe and uncheck readonly
      • then select WINDOWS_GUI in Subsystem inside IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER
      • also notice apollo is a 32-bit executable
    • also checkout Nimplant or others
    • Nighthawk
  • Stage two should be in-memory, inline-execute and feature reach
    • Nighthawk, Cobalt Strike, etc

Exec/DLL to SHELLCODE

For detailed information on converting executables and DLLs to shellcode, including:

  • Embedding shellcode into loaders
  • Backdooring legitimate PE executables
  • Tools like Donut, sRDI, Pe2shc and Amber
  • Open-source shellcode loaders like ScareCrow and NimPackt-v1

See the Shellcode documentation.

EDR Evasion Techniques

For detailed information on EDR evasion techniques, including:

  • Malware Virtualization
  • API Unhooking
  • Early Cascade Injection
  • Killing Bit techniques
  • Call Stack Obfuscation
  • Sleep Obfuscation

See the EDR Evasion documentation

Modern CyberDefense Stack

  • Secure Email Gateway / Email Security
    • FireEye MX
    • Cisco Email Security
    • TrendMicro for Email
    • MS Defender for Office365
  • Secure Web Gateway
    • Symantec BlueCoat
    • PaloAlto Proxy
    • Zscaler
    • FireEye NX
  • Secure DNS
    • Cisco Umbrella
    • DNSFilter
    • Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector
  • AntiVirus
    • McAfee
    • ESET
    • Symantec
    • BitDefender
    • Kaspersky
  • EDR
    • CrowdStrike Falcon
    • MS Defender for Endpoint
    • SentinelOne
    • VMware Carbon Black

Defensive quick‑wins

  • Email/web controls
    • Enable Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Safe Links and Safe Attach (or vendor equivalent).
    • Block direct download of executable formats; detonate unknowns in sandbox.
  • Office hardening
    • Keep "Block macros from the Internet (MOTW)" enforced; prefer trusted locations.
    • Block XLL add‑ins, unsigned COM add‑ins, and legacy Excel 4.0 macros
    • ASR rules: Block Office child processes; Block Win32 API calls from Office; Block executable content from email and webmail; Block credential stealing from LSASS.
  • Browser/extension control
    • Enforce extension allowlists (Chrome/Edge/Firefox policy); disable developer mode on managed devices.
  • Identity & auth
    • Enforce MFA; restrict OAuth app consent (publisher verification + admin consent workflows); tenant restrictions.
    • Prefer phishing‑resistant MFA (FIDO2/CTAP); block legacy/basic auth; monitor device‑code flow abuse.
  • Endpoint policies
    • WDAC/Smart App Control or application allow‑listing for untrusted installers (MSI/MSIX/ClickOnce).
    • Monitor and restrict PowerShell Constrained Language Mode exceptions; log script block.
    • For WinRM: prefer Kerberos/certificate auth; set WinRMS channel binding to Strict: winrm set winrm/config/service/auth '@{CbtHardeningLevel="Strict"}'.

Security Controls Evasion

Perimeter Defense Evasion

Secure Web Gateway

  • sensitive on
    • Domain characteristics
    • URL-fetched contents (HTML, body, javascript)
    • MIME types (where file type is allowed or not)
  • can be evaded via
    • high reputation servers (cloud instances)
    • HTML smuggling

Secure DNS

  • sensitive on
    • Domain categorisation, maturity, whois examination
    • Presence on real-time blocking lists, threat intelligence feeds, virustotal-alike databases
    • SSL/TLS certificate contents
  • can be evaded via
    • high reputation domains (Domain fronting CDN like azure edge CDN, Cloud-based resources like AWS lambda or azure blob st

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars6.8k
CategorySecurity
Updated6d ago
Forks896

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions