SkillAgentSearch skills...

Salesforce-Intelligence

Know what breaks before you change Salesforce. Ask your AI about your org: where a field is used, what runs on save, which Apex is dead, who can see what. Offline, read-only, cited. Open source (MIT).

Install / Use

claude mcp add PranavNagrecha -- npx -y github:PranavNagrecha/Salesforce-Intelligence

If the server publishes to npm under a different name, use that package instead — check the repo README.

About this skill
🔌

MCP Server

Model Context Protocol server

Quality Score

83/100

Supported Platforms

Claude Code
Claude Desktop
Cursor

Our assessment of Salesforce-Intelligence

Salesforce-Intelligence scores 83/100 on our quality scale, 662nd of 947 AI & Machine Learning skills we index.

Its MCP Server is 31 KB long, well organised into 37 sections with 11 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

It has 3 GitHub stars, so there is little community track record yet; judge it on its content.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
3/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 11 days ago, so Salesforce-Intelligence is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 92/100, with 1 caution from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

Safety scan

No issues found

Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful.

AI review by kimi-k2.7-code on 2026-10-31. Automated pattern scan on 2026-10-31. It catches known dangerous patterns, not every risk — read a skill before letting an agent act on it.

Salesforce-Intelligence compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than Salesforce-Intelligence; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
Salesforce-Intelligence (this skill)by PranavNagrecha83311d agoMCP Server
Agent-Reachby Panniantong100107.1k6d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-memby thedotmack100107.0ktodayCLAUDE.md
Understand-Anythingby Egonex-AI10089.3k5d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10078.4ktodayCLAUDE.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install Salesforce-Intelligence?
Run claude mcp add PranavNagrecha -- npx -y github:PranavNagrecha/Salesforce-Intelligence. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does Salesforce-Intelligence work with?
It is written for Claude Code, Claude Desktop and Cursor, as a MCP Server file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is Salesforce-Intelligence safe to use?
Our scan of the whole file found no instruction hijacking, hidden characters, credential access, data exfiltration or destructive commands. An AI review of the same text found nothing harmful. It is MIT-licensed and scores 92/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is Salesforce-Intelligence still maintained?
The repository was last updated 11 days ago, so Salesforce-Intelligence is actively maintained.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/hero.svg" alt="sf-intelligence — Salesforce Org Intelligence for AI agents: a read-only, offline MCP server and CLI" width="100%"> </p> <p align="center"> <a href="./LICENSE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-blue.svg" alt="License: MIT"></a> <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/sf-intelligence"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/sf-intelligence.svg?color=cb3837&label=npm" alt="npm version"></a> <a href="https://github.com/PranavNagrecha/Salesforce-Intelligence/actions/workflows/ci.yml"><img src="https://github.com/PranavNagrecha/Salesforce-Intelligence/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg" alt="CI"></a> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/node-%E2%89%A520-339933.svg" alt="Node.js >= 20"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/status-read--only%20%26%20offline-2ea44f.svg" alt="Read-only and offline-first"> <a href="https://sfi.auditforce.cloud"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/docs-sfi.auditforce.cloud-0B6B6A.svg" alt="Website and docs: sfi.auditforce.cloud"></a> </p>

sf-intelligence

Know what breaks before you change Salesforce. Ask the AI assistant you already use about your org. sf-intelligence runs on your computer, never writes to your org, and every answer names the components it came from.

<p align="center"><img src="assets/demo.gif" alt="A question typed into an AI assistant: can I delete Project__c.Risk_Score__c? The answer: not safe, blocking; the Apex handler writes it, its test reads it, the Residential layout shows it; every line cites a component." width="820"></p>

Website, demo and docs: sfi.auditforce.cloud · Works in Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code + Copilot and Codex.

What it answers

The questions below were checked by an outside reviewer against a real production org (about 4,700 components) by reading the raw metadata. The answers were right.

| Ask | What you get back | |---|---| | Where is this field used? | Every Apex class, flow, layout, validation rule, report and page that references it, each with how it was found (declared, parsed or heuristic) | | Can I delete this field? | A verdict (safe, risky, blocking, review) with the reasons and the components behind each one, plus what was not checked | | What happens when I save a record? | The save order for one object and one event: triggers, validation rules, flows, approvals, in the sequence they run | | Which Apex is dead? | Classes and triggers nothing calls, with the honest tier (definitely, likely, uncertain) and why | | Who can see or edit this? | Effective permissions from profile plus permission sets, and why a given user cannot see a record |

A real answer from the built-in demo org (a solar installer called Verdant), unedited:

Can I delete Project__c.Risk_Score__c? Not safe to delete: blocking. ProjectTriggerHandler writes it and ProjectTriggerHandlerTest reads it (parsed from the Apex); the Residential page layout shows it (declared). Checked: Apex, flows, workflow rules, validation rules, layouts. Not checked: assignment, auto-response and escalation rules, because they were not retrieved.

Try it in three commands

npm install -g sf-intelligence
claude mcp add --scope user sf-intelligence-demo -- npx -y sf-intelligence demo   # a built-in demo org, no Salesforce login; then ask your assistant a question
cd your-sfdx-project && sfi init --target-org my-org-alias   # then: connect your own org (read-only retrieve)

sfi demo on its own starts an MCP server and waits for a host; it is not a command to run in a terminal.

Then register the server in your AI host; the install guide has the exact block for each host. Or one click: Add the demo to Cursor Try the built-in demo org in Cursor in one click (no Salesforce login). AI agents installing this server: see llms-install.md.

By default your assistant sees 16 tools: the eight that answer the questions above and eight that help it find its way (sfi.resolve, sfi.search_components, sfi.get_component, sfi.health_check, sfi.list_analyses, sfi.describe_analysis, sfi.run_analysis, sfi.live_consent). Every other analysis sits behind one gateway tool, sfi.run_analysis, and is listed by sfi.list_analyses. The vault is a local folder, answers are served offline, and the optional live read-only plane is off until you turn it on. What your AI assistant does and does not see is in Privacy.

For engineers: how the vault, the dependency graph and your assistant fit together is in How it works; what is deliberately not modeled is in What it does NOT do.

Ask it like a person

You don't need to know the exact API name of anything. A typo-tolerant resolver turns messy phrasing into the right component, and when it isn't sure it asks you a clarifying question instead of guessing:

You: where's the emale field?

It: I found several matches for "email" — which did you mean? · Email__c on Account · Email__c on Contact · Alternate_Email__c on Lead

You: what about the paymnet object?

It: Payment__c — one confident match.

You: is there a "warranty fee" field?

It: Nothing matched that confidently. Your vault was last refreshed on 2026-05-20 — want to pull fresh metadata from the org (/sfi-refresh) in case it's new, or rephrase?

It never silently commits to a guess. When several components are plausible it asks which you meant; when nothing matches it offers to refresh from the org or stop. A high match score is string similarity, not proof.

How it works

One read-only refresh turns your org into a local vault: the raw metadata, one Markdown page per component, and a dependency graph. From then on every question is answered offline. Your AI assistant resolves the name you used, calls one of the 16 default tools (or sfi.run_analysis for any other analysis), and builds its answer only from what came back, citing each component.

flowchart TB
    subgraph REFRESH["Refresh — once, and whenever the org changes"]
        direction LR
        ORG[("Salesforce org")] -->|"sf project retrieve (read-only)"| SRC["source/ raw metadata"]
        SRC -->|"extract + parse Apex / Flow / XML"| VAULT[("Local vault<br/>Markdown + DuckDB graph")]
    end

    subgraph ASK["Ask — every question, offline on your machine"]
        direction TB
        Q["Your question<br/>(plain language)"] --> HOST["Your AI assistant<br/>(Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Codex)"]
        HOST -->|"1 · sfi.resolve"| RESOLVE["The component you meant<br/>(or a clarifying question)"]
        RESOLVE --> HOST
        HOST -->|"2 · a core tool, or<br/>sfi.run_analysis for the rest"| TOOLS["sfi.* analysis"]
        TOOLS -->|"read"| VAULT
        TOOLS -.->|"opt-in, read-only, capped"| LIVE[("Live org")]
        TOOLS -->|"cited components + confidence<br/>+ what was not checked"| HOST
        HOST --> ANS["Grounded answer"]
    end

Every box on the Ask path runs on your machine; the dotted edge to the live org is the only one that can touch Salesforce, and only after you opt in.

How it stays honest

Every answer is built from tool output, never from general Salesforce knowledge. Each relationship carries how it was found: declared (stated in the metadata), parsed (from Apex, Flow or formula source) or heuristic (pattern matching, so spot-check before acting). Each answer says which metadata families were checked and which were not, so "nothing references this" always means "no evidence in what was retrieved". A request to change the org is refused and answered with the read-only check that fits instead. For "what does this imply" questions, a deterministic, offline concept model of general Salesforce truth (never your org's data) adds cited structural claims, such as a master-detail cascade delete or two flows with an undefined order. The details: routing and refusal, architecture and the trust boundary, asking questions, ADR-001 confidence-tagged edges and ADR-008 deterministic reasoning.

What you can ask

Every area answers in plain language; ask "what can you do?" for the live map.

| Area | Example questions | | --- | --- | | Find & identify | "where is the email field?" · "what's the payment object called?" | | Understand | "what does this validation rule do?" · "what happens when an Account is saved?" (automation on standard objects works even when the object itself was not retrieved; the answer says so) | | Impact & dependencies | "what breaks if I delete this field?" · "is it safe to deactivate this flow?" | | Permissions & sharing | "why can't this user see this record?" · "who can edit the Salary field?" · "who holds the Sales Manager permission set?" (live) · "what does user Jane hold?" (live) · "who's in the Support queue?" (live) · "which active users have zero permission-set assignments?" (live) | | Automation & code | "what runs on Case create?" · "which Apex methods have no real test coverage?" · "decode this Apex debug log / governor-limit exception to the class that ran" | | Decision-support (before you build/change) | "before I add automation to this object, what already runs there?" · "building Apex here — what should I watch out for?" · "before I change/require this field, what breaks?" | | Architect & developer | "are there circular Apex dependencies?" · "which classes have no test reference?" · "does the vault still match the live org?" | | Integrations | "what external systems does this org talk to?" · "list every outbound endpoint" | | Documentation | "give me a tour of this org" · "generate a data dictionary" · "which reports / objects / permission sets have no description?" | | Health & audit | "is my vault fresh?" · "where is PII stored?" · "how has the org changed across refreshes?" |

All of these are read-only briefings; none of them write to the org. Every component an answer names is backed by a tool call and cited with its canonical id (CustomObject:Account, CustomField:Account.Industry__c), and every relationship with its confidence (declared, parsed or heuristic). The full catalog with the live counts comes from sfi.capabilities (through sfi.run_analysis) or the tools page; the counts are pinned by eval/product-manifest.json, never typed by hand.

What it does NOT do

Boundaries are explicit, and the product tells you plainly when it hits one rather than papering over the gap with general Salesforce knowledge:

  • Offline by default. Vault tools never call Salesforce mid-conversation. Run /sfi-refresh (or sfi refresh) to update metadata. The opt-in live tools (sfi.live_*) run read-only queries with strict caps and label their answers live_org. They stay off until you grant consent once per org with sfi.live_consent { grant: true } (bound to the org and user, scoped, expiring, stored locally) or set SFI_LIVE_PLANE_ENABLED=1. A per-call liveEnabled: true is intent only, not consent. Hybrid answers combine the vault and the live org and say so. The product never picks which org to query on its own.
  • No record-level data. The vault stores schema and source, not rows. "How many Opportunities closed last quarter" is a question for your org directly.
  • Static analysis, not runtime. Dependency edges come from metadat

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars3
CategoryAI
Updated11d ago
Forks0

Languages

TypeScript

Trust signals

92/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

1 low
Salesforce-Intelligence — MCP Server: Install & Safety Check | SkillAgent