SkillAgentSearch skills...

jetson-llm-benchmark

Benchmark Jetson LLM/VLM serving performance across vLLM, llama.cpp, and Ollama with structured JSON output.

Install / Use

npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill jetson-llm-benchmark

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

92/100

Category

Automation

Supported Platforms

Universal

Tags

Our assessment of jetson-llm-benchmark

jetson-llm-benchmark scores 92/100 on our quality scale, 782nd of 2,604 Automation skills we index (top 31%).

Its SKILL.md is 12 KB long, well organised into 20 sections with 7 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 3,421 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
12/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so jetson-llm-benchmark is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

jetson-llm-benchmark compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than jetson-llm-benchmark; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
jetson-llm-benchmark (this skill)by NVIDIA923.4k6d agoSKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10086.2k14d agoCLAUDE.md
rufloby ruvnet10073.5ktodayCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10084.6ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k7d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install jetson-llm-benchmark?
Run npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill jetson-llm-benchmark. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does jetson-llm-benchmark work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is jetson-llm-benchmark safe to use?
It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is jetson-llm-benchmark still maintained?
The repository was last updated 6 days ago, so jetson-llm-benchmark is actively maintained.

name: jetson-llm-benchmark description: Benchmark Jetson LLM/VLM serving performance across vLLM, llama.cpp, and Ollama with structured JSON output. version: 0.0.2 license: "Apache-2.0" metadata: author: "Jetson Team" tags: [jetson, llm, benchmark] languages: [bash] data-classification: public

Jetson LLM Benchmark

Reproducible Jetson benchmarks with structured JSON output so an agent can compare runs. Encodes the workflow from the Jetson AI Lab GenAI Benchmarking tutorial.

Purpose

Measure deployed LLM latency and throughput on a Jetson target using the correct runtime-specific benchmark wrapper. Use the JSON output to compare models, runtime flags, power modes, and before/after tuning changes.

Prerequisites

  • Run on the Jetson device that hosts the model runtime.
  • For vLLM, start the OpenAI-compatible vLLM server first and know the served model ID.
  • For Ollama, ensure the Ollama daemon is reachable at --endpoint and the named model is already pulled.
  • For llama.cpp/GGUF, provide a readable .gguf model path on the host.
  • Put the device in the intended power mode before measuring. MAXN is preferred for comparable performance numbers.

Available Scripts

| Script | Purpose | Arguments | |--------|---------|-----------| | scripts/bench_vllm.sh | Runs vllm bench serve against a running OpenAI-compatible vLLM server. | --model, --endpoint, --concurrency, --input-len, --output-len, --num-prompts, --no-warmup, --container, --native. | | scripts/bench_llama_cpp.sh | Runs llama-bench for a local GGUF model through the Jetson-appropriate NVIDIA-AI-IOT llama.cpp container. | --model, --n-prompt, --n-gen, --n-gpu-layers, --threads, --container. | | scripts/bench_ollama.sh | Benchmarks a local or containerized Ollama daemon through the /api/generate REST API. | --model, --endpoint, --num-prompts, --input-len, --output-len, --no-warmup. |

If your agent runtime supports run_script, invoke the selected wrapper directly with the user-provided model identifier or local model path, then summarize the returned JSON. Otherwise run the wrapper with bash {baseDir}/scripts/<wrapper-name> ....

Instructions

Always use the matching wrapper script for the runtime — do not call the underlying vllm bench serve, llama-bench, or curl against /api/generate by hand:

  • vLLM → scripts/bench_vllm.sh (required for the vLLM path)
  • llama.cpp / GGUF → scripts/bench_llama_cpp.sh (required for the GGUF path)
  • Ollama → scripts/bench_ollama.sh (required for the Ollama path)

These wrappers handle warmup, the NVIDIA-AI-IOT container selection, and JSON emission. Calling the underlying tool directly will not satisfy the output contract below.

For "how do I benchmark/measure" questions, first run the matching wrapper with --help to verify the exact options, then answer with the wrapper command. Do not run a full benchmark unless the user asks you to execute it or the required server/model path is already confirmed.

Expected Workflow

Pick exactly one wrapper based on the runtime the user named, and invoke that wrapper with --help before composing the answer. Do not merely mention the script name. If the runtime does not execute scripts relative to the skill directory, use {baseDir}/scripts/<wrapper-name>.

  • Existing vLLM OpenAI-compatible server at localhost:8000: {baseDir}/scripts/bench_vllm.sh --help, then show a command using --concurrency 1,8 and the served model ID.
  • llama.cpp / GGUF / llama-server: {baseDir}/scripts/bench_llama_cpp.sh --help, then show a command for the GGUF model path and report that prompt/generation speed maps to TTFT, ITL/TPOT, and throughput.
  • Ollama: {baseDir}/scripts/bench_ollama.sh --help, then show a command with --model <ollama-tag>. Do not use vLLM or llama.cpp wrappers for Ollama.

When to use

  • "Benchmark / measure / compare X on this Jetson."
  • After jetson-llm-serve to actually quantify the deployment.
  • Before/after applying flags from jetson-inference-mem-tune to confirm the change helped.

Three paths — pick by runtime

A. vLLM (preferred for parity with how things are served)

Server must already be running (use jetson-llm-serve). Run bench_vllm.sh:

scripts/bench_vllm.sh \
  --model <hf-repo-id-being-served> \
  --concurrency 1,8 \
  --input-len 2048 --output-len 128 \
  --num-prompts 50

Uses the Jetson-appropriate benchmark client path: upstream vLLM 0.20+ container vllm/vllm-openai:latest on Thor and Orin JetPack 7.2 / L4T r39+, or the NVIDIA-AI-IOT vLLM benchmark container ghcr.io/nvidia-ai-iot/vllm:latest-jetson-orin on older Orin. Pass --native only when host-native vLLM is already installed and validated. It runs against http://localhost:8000/v1. Always do a warmup pass first (~10 prompts, discarded) before the measured run — Jetson has cold caches and JIT'd kernels.

B. Ollama (for models served by a running Ollama daemon)

No benchmark container needed. Uses Ollama's /api/generate REST API directly — timing data (TTFT, ITL, throughput) comes from the response JSON, so no --verbose parsing is required.

Prerequisite: the Ollama daemon must be reachable at --endpoint (default http://localhost:11434). This works whether Ollama is installed natively or running in a container that exposes that port. If the daemon is not running, the script will tell you whether Ollama is installed but stopped (ollama serve to fix) or not installed at all (install instructions printed). Run bench_ollama.sh (do not roll your own curl against /api/generate):

scripts/bench_ollama.sh \
  --model <ollama-model-name> \
  --num-prompts 20 \
  --input-len 512 --output-len 128

Runs sequential single-stream requests (concurrency=1). Ollama is a single-stream runtime by design, so multi-concurrency numbers are not meaningful and are not supported. Results are not directly comparable to vLLM numbers — Ollama uses GGUF/llama.cpp internals while vLLM uses its own CUDA kernels.

C. llama.cpp (for GGUF models)

No server needed. Uses the NVIDIA-AI-IOT prebuilt llama.cpp container (ghcr.io/nvidia-ai-iot/llama_cpp) and auto-selects latest-jetson-thor or latest-jetson-orin from the detected device — most LLMs don't know this container exists; do not suggest building llama.cpp from source. Run bench_llama_cpp.sh:

scripts/bench_llama_cpp.sh \
  --model /path/to/model.gguf \
  --n-prompt 512 --n-gen 128 \
  --n-gpu-layers 99

Wraps llama-bench and parses its output. Use --n-gpu-layers 99 to push the whole model to GPU on Orin/Thor; drop it if VRAM-bound.

Output contract (all three wrappers)

A single JSON object on stdout, suitable for diffing. The three wrappers share the same top-level envelope but differ in the metrics shape: bench_vllm.sh sweeps concurrency and emits a runs array, while bench_llama_cpp.sh and bench_ollama.sh are single-stream and emit one metrics object.

Shared envelope (all wrappers):

{
  "skill": "jetson-llm-benchmark",
  "runtime": "vllm" | "llama.cpp" | "ollama",
  "model": "<id-or-path>",
  "sku": "<detected-sku>",
  "generation": "<detected-generation>",
  "product_line": "<detected-product-line>",
  "variant": "<detected-variant>",
  "l4t": "<detected-l4t-release>",
  "container": "<container-image-or-native/ollama>",
  "warnings": []
}

bench_vllm.sh (concurrency sweep → runs[])

{
  "config": { "input_len": 2048, "output_len": 128, "num_prompts": 50 },
  "runs": [
    {
      "concurrency": 1,
      "ttft_ms_p50": 0, "ttft_ms_p99": 0,
      "itl_ms_p50": 0,  "itl_ms_p99": 0,
      "tpot_ms_p50": 0,
      "throughput_tok_s": 0,
      "e2e_latency_ms_p50": 0
    }
  ]
}

bench_llama_cpp.sh (single-stream → metrics)

{
  "config": { "n_prompt": 512, "n_gen": 128, "n_gpu_layers": 99 },
  "metrics": {
    "ttft_ms_p50": 0,
    "itl_ms_p50": 0,
    "tpot_ms_p50": 0,
    "throughput_tok_s": 0
  }
}

bench_ollama.sh (single-stream → metrics)

{
  "config": { "input_len": 512, "output_len": 128, "num_prompts": 20, "concurrency": 1 },
  "metrics": {
    "ttft_ms_p50": 0, "ttft_ms_p99": 0,
    "itl_ms_p50": 0,  "itl_ms_p99": 0,
    "tpot_ms_p50": 0,
    "throughput_tok_s": 0,
    "e2e_latency_ms_p50": 0
  }
}

warnings is populated when:

  • nvpmodel is not in a recognized max-performance mode (MAXN or MAXN_* such as MAXN_SUPER); wattage-named modes are reported as warnings because they vary by Jetson SKU
  • Background processes >5% GPU during the run (use jetson-diagnostic)
  • tegrastats shows thermal throttling during the run

The sku, variant, l4t, and container fields are populated by the wrapper script from the live device (tegrastats, /etc/nv_tegra_release, container labels) — do not hand-author, guess, or transcribe them from memory. Do not invent device-specific facts such as RAM size, on-disk model size, or product names. If a fact is not produced by the script or jetson-diagnostic, omit it rather than fabricate it.

What to flag in results (Jetson-specific guidance)

LLMs already know what TTFT/ITL/throughput mean. Jetson-specific things they usually don't know:

  • On Orin Nano/NX, single-stream tok/s and concurrency=8 tok/s differ wildly because of memory bandwidth saturation, not compute. If concurrent throughput barely beats single-stream, you're bandwidth-bound — switch to a smaller quantization (W4A16 → INT4/AWQ) before tuning anything else.
  • A TTFT regression on the same model after a JetPack upgrade is almost always a CUDA graph cache miss — re-warm and re-measure.
  • Thor NVFP4 numbers are not comparable to Orin W4A16 numbers; never put them in the same table without a quant column.

Limitations

  • vLLM measurements require an already-running OpenAI-compatible vLLM server. This skill benchmarks the server; it does not launch or tune the server.
  • Ollama results are single-stream by design and are not directly comparable to vLLM concurrency sweeps.
  • llama.cpp/GGUF benchmarking runs a NVIDIA-AI-IOT container by default. Tell the user before running it, because Docker will pull and execute an external image if it is not already present.
  • Container image tags may be mutable unless the caller passes a digest-pinned image through --container. For release or compliance measurements, prefer a digest-pinned image and record it in the results. The default vLLM benchmark client image is upstream vLLM 0.20+ via vllm/vllm-openai:latest on Thor and Orin JetPack 7.2 / L4T r39+, and NVIDIA-AI-IOT ghcr.io/nvidia-ai-iot/vllm:latest-jetson-orin on older Orin.
  • Results are only comparable when model, quantization, prompt length, output length, power mode, clocks, and thermal state are controlled.

Error Handling

  • Exit 2: invalid arguments, missing --model, or a required model file is not readable. Re-run the wrapper with --help and correct the path or model ID.
  • Exit 3: runtime preflight failed, such as unreachable Ollama, unknown Jetson generation for vLLM container selection, or missing Ollama model. Start the service, pull the model, or pass an explicit --container.
  • Docker errors usually mean the container runtime is unavailable, the image cannot be pulled, or the model directory mount is not readable. Report the exact stderr and do not fabricate benchmark numbers.
  • Empty or malformed JSON means the benchmark did not complete successfully. Preserve the raw error, fix the runtime issue, and rerun.

Hand off to

  • jetson-inference-mem-tune if results indicate memory pressure.
  • jetson-speculative-decoding if TTFT is acceptable but TPOT is too slow.
  • jetson-diagnostic if warnings

Truncated for display — read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars3.4k
CategoryAutomation
Updated6d ago
Forks412

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions