SkillAgentSearch skills...

cdf-simulation

Component-owned guidance for CDF Simulation requests submitted directly or through Airflow-triggered DIG Flow Catalog prompts β€” golden THT board, THT pin-geometry variation, good/clean SMT images, structural pose defects, and solder texture defects, from a board USD.

Install / Use

npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill cdf-simulation

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
πŸ“„

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

95/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of cdf-simulation

cdf-simulation scores 95/100 on our quality scale, 368th of 4,583 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 9%).

Its SKILL.md is 37 KB long, well organised into 27 sections with 5 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 3,421 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
30/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
15/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 29 days ago, so cdf-simulation is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the Apache-2.0 license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit β€” read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

cdf-simulation compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than cdf-simulation; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
cdf-simulation (this skill)by NVIDIA953.4k29d agoSKILL.md
taste-skillby Leonxlnx100101.2k2d agoCLAUDE.md
ai-job-searchby ai-job-search-dev10063.7k2d agoCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910043.4k2d agoCLAUDE.md
LocalAIby mudler10049.9ktodayMCP Server

Frequently asked questions

How do I install cdf-simulation?
Run npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill cdf-simulation. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does cdf-simulation work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is cdf-simulation safe to use?
It is Apache-2.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is cdf-simulation still maintained?
The repository was last updated 29 days ago, so cdf-simulation is actively maintained.

name: cdf-simulation description: Component-owned guidance for CDF Simulation requests submitted directly or through Airflow-triggered DIG Flow Catalog prompts β€” golden THT board, THT pin-geometry variation, good/clean SMT images, structural pose defects, and solder texture defects, from a board USD. Turns one matched prompt into one validated cdf.CDFJob build and its compiled JobOrder payload; it never executes a render itself. Requires a caller-supplied board USD and output root, asks for either when missing from an interactive request, and resolves optional details with fixed, documented defaults. license: Apache-2.0 owner: NVIDIA service: cdf-simulation metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: NVIDIA CDF cdf@nvidia.com tags:

  • physical-ai
  • synthetic-data-generation
  • simulation
  • pcba
  • aoi
  • airflow

cdf-simulation

Turns DIG Flow Catalog prompt templates and equivalent direct requests into cdf jobs through the declarative Python API. This skill is the component-owned guidance for cdf-simulation: a caller supplies a board USD and output root, this skill builds and compiles the job, and the caller can pass the payload to its own executor. Airflow may inject those required inputs, or the caller may provide them directly. If either is missing and interaction is possible, ask once. All optional ambiguity is resolved with fixed, documented defaults. If a request truly cannot be served (an unsupported defect type, a non-USD input), say so rather than guessing at a fake capability or silently doing nothing.

This skill does not execute. It produces a validated CDFJob build and its compiled JobOrder payload, then stops. An Airflow DAG or another executor chosen by the caller performs rendering.

Catalog coverage

This skill implements five DIG Flow Catalog rows, all taking a board USD as input:

| # | Row | Status | |---|---|---| | 1 | Golden board (THT) | Implemented | | 2 | Variation type (THT pin geometry) | Implemented | | 3 | Good images (SMT) | Implemented | | 4 | Structural defects (SMT) | Implemented | | 5 | Texture defects (SMT solder) | Implemented, except bridge (unsupported β€” see below) |

Reference flows

Beside the catalog rows, the skill serves the five reference flows in references/reference-flows.md: complete inspection jobs, each phrased as one prompt whose compiled plan must equal the equivalent YAML config. A prompt carrying a flow marker -- a scan grid and "stitched", a defect on a named refdes ("shift on C33", "insufficient solder on J17", "missing-component defect on LS1"), "component-focus" or "pin-focus" crops -- is a flow, not a catalog row, and takes its fixed values from that file (they differ from the catalog defaults: shift is translate_range=0.5, rotate_z_range=5.0 with no variant_index, crops are ROI captures rather than postprocess.crop).

| Flow | Prompt marker | |---|---| | G golden scan | "golden board dataset ... NxM scan ... stitched" (single board or panel) | | C component defects | "shift/tombstone/sideflip/reverse polarity on <refdes>" + "component-focus crops" | | S SMT solder defects | "insufficient/excess/interrupted/missing solder on <refdes>" + "component-focus crops" | | M missing component | "missing-component defect on <refdes>" | | T THT solder defects | six THT solder defects on refdes + "pin-focus crops from the bottom" (single board or panel) |

Fixed defaults

Every unspecified optional detail resolves to a documented default rather than a question. The full table -- board identity and paths, the rule that a named component must resolve on the attachment, THT board requirements, pin-variation magnitude ranges, the required structural-defect magnitudes (translate_range, rotate_z_range, angle_range -- the API has no defaults for these and a catalog prompt never states them), the coverage ratio, how multiple defect types combine, and the solder texture-defect mapping -- is in references/fixed-defaults.md.

Read it before building any script. The values are not obvious and several of them are load-bearing: the coverage ratio applies to structural and solder defects, and the crop class_filter taxonomy is not the same as component_types.

Payload contract

What this skill returns to its caller, what it accepts, and how each value is validated is in references/payload-contract.md. The short version: the output is a CDFJob build plus the compiled JobOrderPlan from job.compile_orders(...), serialized with JobOrderCodec.dumps(plan) (a bare plan.model_dump() is not JSON-serializable), together with a resolved-inputs summary naming every default that applied. The caller supplies the board USD and output root -- both required, with no fallback. This skill supplies everything else from the catalog row and fixed defaults, and marks each variant for an independent process.

Instructions

Four steps, in order. Step 1 decides everything downstream, so do not start writing a script before the row is settled.

  1. Match the prompt to exactly one catalog row or one reference flow. Check the flow markers first (references/reference-flows.md, "Routing"): a named refdes target, a scan grid with "stitched", "component-focus" / "pin-focus" crops. With a marker present the prompt is that flow; without one it is a catalog row. A prompt matching no row and no flow explains the supported request shapes and asks the caller to choose one; it never assembles a best-effort substitute out of the pieces that do exist.
  2. Resolve every input from the precedence order in Inputs. Anything still unset takes its documented default from references/fixed-defaults.md.
  3. Build one cdf.CDFJob script, following the row's shape in Workflow. One job per variant: the executing side must launch each variant as its own process, because sequential job.capture.render(...) calls in one process crash the second Kit subprocess -- so the payload says one variant, never a loop.
  4. Validate, then return -- compile the job with job.compile_orders(...), read the result, and return the build plus the compiled plan to the caller. Do not call render() here. Report what was assumed alongside the payload.

Inputs

Each value is resolved from the first source that supplies it:

state file -> explicit prompt arguments -> agent context -> user prompt text

| Input | Required | Where it comes from if unset | |---|---|---| | Catalog row | yes | Matched from the prompt shape; no default. No match asks the caller to choose a supported shape | | Board USD (attachment path) | yes, caller-provided | No fallback. Ask for a missing path when interaction is possible; for non-interactive automation, stop with refusal case 3. Never substitute a sample board | | Output root | yes, caller-provided | No fallback. Ask for a missing path when interaction is possible; for non-interactive automation, stop with refusal case 3. Never synthesize a directory | | Component sidecar | optional legacy input | Prefer embedded USD metadata with source="usd". Attach a matching <stem>.components.json only when a legacy standalone board relies on it or the caller explicitly selects that source; file presence alone does not select it. Instanced panels require embedded metadata | | Board root_path | no | Read from the supplied stage, or from the selected legacy sidecar for a sidecar-backed board. For instanced panels follow references/reference-flows.md, "Panels". Opening the attachment is required; an unreadable or unresolved board stops with refusal case 3. Never use another board's root as a fallback | | Named component | from the prompt | Passed through as named when present in the selected metadata source (embedded USD by default, or an explicitly selected legacy sidecar -- list types, do not guess); a missing name is refusal case 4, never substituted. State the check in the run summary | | Component types | no | The row's documented set | | Seed, scan grid, board side, resolution, pin numbers (flows) | no | Explicit prompt arguments in the forms listed in references/reference-flows.md ("Seed 7", "a 5x4 scan", "of the bottom side", "at 2000x2000", "(pin SH)"); otherwise that file's per-flow defaults | | Panel instances | from the attachment | When the attachment composes one board as several USD instances (<root>/StepRepeats/SR_*), register all of them with job.scene.instances(...); image budgets multiply by the instance count (references/reference-flows.md, "Panels") | | Coverage ratio | no | The single documented ratio, applied to structural and solder defects; the executing side selects max(1, int(pool * ratio)), so a non-empty selection always yields at least one defect | | Defect magnitudes | no | The per-type ranges in references/fixed-defaults.md | | class_filter | no | None. Never a component-type string -- different taxonomy |

State what was resolved and from where in the run summary so the caller can see which defaults applied.

Workflow

1. Match the prompt to a catalog row

Use the sample-prompt phrasing in the table under "Catalog coverage" and in "Examples" below to classify the request into exactly one of rows 1-5.

If a prompt does not clearly match any of the rows or a reference flow, explain the supported request shapes and ask the caller to choose one.

2. Resolve inputs deterministically

Extract from the prompt: attached USD path, output root, named component(s), variation/defect type, "full board coverage" flag. Then open the attachment and read two things from it: the board root and its component types, using embedded metadata by default or the selected legacy sidecar for a sidecar-backed standalone board. A named component that appears in those types is used as named; a name that is absent is refusal case 4 -- never a substitution. Apply the fixed defaults above for optional details the prompt does not specify, and record both reads (root source, component check) in the run summary.

The attachment path and the output root are the two inputs with no default. If either is absent and interaction is possible, ask for it once. For non-interactive automation, stop and report it (refusal case 3). Never substitute a sample board or invent an output directory. Prefer embedded USD metadata. Attach a component sidecar only when a legacy standalone board relies on it or the caller explicitly selects it; do not switch sources merely because a .components.json file is nearby. Keep all metadata-dependent calls on that source. Instanced panels cannot use legacy component sidecars.

3. Build the CDFJob script

import pcb_aoi before constructing the job. The "pcb-aoi" domain registers on import; without that import CDFJob(domain="pcb-aoi", ...) raises unknown domain 'pcb-aoi' (registered: none) on the very first line. Every template below assumes import pcb_aoi and from cdf import CDFJob at the top of the script.

Every row requires job.capture.renderer(mode="pathtracing", resolution=..., spp=..., total_spp=..., max_bounces=...) before capture.camera/scan_grid/outputs -- it is a required field, compile_orders() rejects a plan missing it ("capture render pass 'default' is missing: renderer"). Every template below assumes this call is present even where not shown explicitly.

capture.camera(rotation_range=...) is required, not optional -- only side= has a default. A top-side capture with no rotation asked for still needs rotation_range={"z": 0}; omitting the kwarg is a TypeError before anything is compiled.

Several operations.add_* calls have required magnitude kwargs with no defaults (add_shift needs translate_range and rotate_z_range; `add_tombsto

Truncated for display β€” read the full file on GitHub.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars3.4k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated29d ago
Forks412

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit β€” see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions
cdf-simulation β€” Universal Skill: Install & Safety Check | SkillAgent