SkillAgentSearch skills...

fireworks-inference

Run inference on Fireworks AI — direct, through the Leanmcp AI Gateway proxy (aigateway.leanmcp.com) for observability, or via LiteLLM / the OpenAI SDK / raw HTTP.

Install / Use

npx skills add Leanmcp/gateway-skills --skill fireworks-inference

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

93/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of fireworks-inference

fireworks-inference scores 93/100 on our quality scale, 237th of 946 AI & Machine Learning skills we index (top 26%).

Its SKILL.md is 7.7 KB long, well organised into 8 sections with 4 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 2,111 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
14/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 16 days ago, so fireworks-inference is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

fireworks-inference compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than fireworks-inference; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
fireworks-inference (this skill)by Leanmcp932.1k16d agoSKILL.md
claude-memby thedotmack100102.6ktodayCLAUDE.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong100101.4k1d agoCLAUDE.md
Understand-Anythingby Egonex-AI10088.0k1d agoCLAUDE.md
headroomby headroomlabs-ai10077.7ktodayCLAUDE.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install fireworks-inference?
Run npx skills add Leanmcp/gateway-skills --skill fireworks-inference. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does fireworks-inference work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is fireworks-inference safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is fireworks-inference still maintained?
The repository was last updated 16 days ago, so fireworks-inference is actively maintained.

name: fireworks-inference description: Run inference on Fireworks AI — direct, through the Leanmcp AI Gateway proxy (aigateway.leanmcp.com) for observability, or via LiteLLM / the OpenAI SDK / raw HTTP. Covers the endpoint-and-key matrix for each route, serverless vs dedicated deployments and their cold starts, browsing and filtering the model catalogue, reasoning models that return content:null with the answer in reasoning_content, function calling, concurrency and load testing, and runner scripts where many models share one protocol with a --use-proxy toggle. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Fireworks, FIREWORKS_API_KEY, api.fireworks.ai, fireworks_ai/ model ids, accounts/fireworks/models/..., a Fireworks deployment id, the Leanmcp gateway or LEANMCP_API_KEY, app.leanmcp.com observability, or gpt-oss / kimi / glm / qwen / deepseek served on Fireworks; wants to route LLM calls through a proxy for logging or cost tracking; is debugging empty responses, 404s, scope errors, cold starts, or "the gateway isn't working"; wants to pick a Fireworks model with tool calling; or wants to sweep several models over one benchmark. Reach for it even on vague asks like "why is this model returning nothing" or "set up inference for these models" when Fireworks is in play.

Fireworks inference

Inference on Fireworks is three independent choices, and nearly every confusing failure is one of them being wrong while you debug another:

   TRANSPORT                ROUTE                        MODEL
   ─────────                ─────                        ─────
   raw HTTP                 direct Fireworks             serverless
   openai SDK        ×      api.fireworks.ai        ×    accounts/fireworks/models/<slug>
   litellm                  Leanmcp gateway              dedicated deployment
                            aigateway.leanmcp.com        accounts/<acct>/deployments/<id>

This skill's job is to let you isolate them one at a time instead of guessing.

The route matrix — memorize this

| | base URL | key | | --- | --- | --- | | direct Fireworks | https://api.fireworks.ai/inference/v1 | FIREWORKS_API_KEY | | Leanmcp gateway | https://aigateway.leanmcp.com/v1/fireworks | LEANMCP_API_KEY |

Same models, same request and response shape. Only the endpoint and the key change — which is why routing should be a flag, never a code path. Note the key swap: through the gateway you send your Leanmcp key; the gateway holds the Fireworks credential.

Gateway keys at https://app.leanmcp.com/api-keys (top up credits first at https://app.leanmcp.com/billing); every request then shows up at https://app.leanmcp.com/observability.

Start here

Something is broken. Climb the ladder in references/verification.md — each rung isolates one layer, so the first failure names the culprit.

python scripts/fw_smoke.py --model gpt-oss-20b            # raw + sdk + litellm, gateway
python scripts/fw_smoke.py --model gpt-oss-20b --direct   # same, direct

The model returns nothing. Almost always references/reasoning-models.md (the answer is in reasoning_content, or the budget went to reasoning) or a cold deployment (references/models.md).

Picking a model. references/models.md, then python scripts/fw_models.py --serverless --tools --sort context.

Setting up a route or a framework. references/routes.md for the transport quirks, references/gateway.md for the proxy specifics.

Building a sweep. references/runner-scripts.md

Working code at full scale. references/reference-implementation.md.

Scripts

| script | what | | --- | --- | | fw_smoke.py | the same request through raw HTTP, the openai SDK, and litellm, against either route — the first transport that fails names the layer | | fw_models.py | browse/filter the catalogue: serverless, tools, vision, context; emits paste-ready litellm ids or a models.txt | | fw_ready.py | readiness ping for cold deployments; also triggers the scale-up. Shell-friendly exit codes, --wait to block | | fw_hammer.py | load test in three shapes (oneshot / conversation / output), streamed with a heartbeat, p50/p95 latency and failure breakdown |

Model ids — three shapes, not interchangeable

accounts/fireworks/models/gpt-oss-20b            serverless, shared, always warm
accounts/<your-account>/deployments/<id>         dedicated, yours, scales to zero
fireworks_ai/<either of the above>               the litellm form

A bare slug is shorthand you expand yourself; nothing accepts it directly.

litellm: two things that look like the service is down

  1. The model id needs the fireworks_ai/ prefix so litellm picks the provider. Without it litellm guesses from the string, usually wrongly.
  2. litellm appends /chat/completions to api_base. Pass the base without that suffix.
litellm.completion(
    model="fireworks_ai/accounts/fireworks/models/gpt-oss-20b",
    messages=[...],
    api_base="https://aigateway.leanmcp.com/v1/fireworks",   # no /chat/completions
    api_key=os.environ["LEANMCP_API_KEY"],                    # Leanmcp, not Fireworks
)

litellm._turn_on_debug() prints the URL it actually hits — that one line settles most "the gateway is broken" arguments. (It also prints the API key, so treat such a log as a secret.)

Things that are true and easy to miss

content: null is not failure. Reasoning models put chain-of-thought in reasoning_content and may return no content at all — especially when the budget ran out mid-thought (finish_reason: "length"). Always read msg.content or msg.reasoning_content, and budget 4096, not 1024. A tool call with null content is also correct: the model acted instead of speaking.

Cold deployments return 200 with an empty body. A scale-to-zero deployment does not error while spinning up — downstream code dies on the None with TypeError: expected string or bytes-like object, got 'NoneType', which reads as a code bug. Warm it first with fw_ready.py --wait.

The gateway forwards with its credentials. Your private deployment is invisible to it unless the gateway is wired to your Fireworks account — expect a 404, which is configuration, not a bug. Confirm the deployment is alive with a direct call before blaming the gateway.

Tool support is per model, and the flag is a hint. --serverless --tools filters the catalogue, but some models report supportsTools: false and call tools fine. Probe with fw_smoke.py --tools.

Load reveals what a single call cannot. Missing scopes: model.request, rate limits, and under-replicated deployments all pass a smoke test and fail a sweep — unevenly across cells, which silently unbalances the comparison. Hammer at your intended concurrency before launching.

Turn client-side caching off for anything you measure. A cached response is not observed, not billed, and not a measurement.

Route every speaker the same way. Agent through the gateway and the simulated user direct gives you a dashboard showing half the traffic and a cost total that understates the run.

Related

  • research-observability — the gateway tells you what a run cost; a local per-turn trace tells you what the model said and why the episode failed. Use both; the adapters there take LiteLLM/OpenAI responses directly.
  • tinker-training-inference — for the Tinker platform (training and its own inference endpoints).

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars2.1k
CategoryAI
Updated16d ago
Forks2.1k

Languages

Python

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions