SkillAgentSearch skills...

agent-notes

Use when deciding whether a Cherry Studio change needs an Agent Note, authoring or reviewing a Spec, recording a durable bug-fix decision, moving a note between proposed/implemented/rejected, or checking supersession and stacked Spec approval.

Install / Use

npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill agent-notes

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

87/100

Category

Automation

Supported Platforms

Universal

Our assessment of agent-notes

agent-notes scores 87/100 on our quality scale, 1694th of 2,901 Automation skills we index.

Its SKILL.md is 4.5 KB long, split into 6 sections and no code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.

With 52,735 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
26/30
Structure
11/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
20/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated today, so agent-notes is actively maintained.
  • It is released under AGPL-3.0, a copyleft license: you can use it, but modified versions you distribute must carry the same license.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

agent-notes compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than agent-notes; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
agent-notes (this skill)by CherryHQ8752.7ktodaySKILL.md
Agent-Reachby Panniantong10099.4k4d agoCLAUDE.md
Scraplingby D4Vinci10088.6ktodayMCP Server
rufloby ruvnet10076.8ktodayMCP Server
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k26d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install agent-notes?
Run npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill agent-notes. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does agent-notes work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is agent-notes safe to use?
It is AGPL-3.0-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is agent-notes still maintained?
The repository was last updated today, so agent-notes is actively maintained.

name: agent-notes description: Use when deciding whether a Cherry Studio change needs an Agent Note, authoring or reviewing a Spec, recording a durable bug-fix decision, moving a note between proposed/implemented/rejected, or checking supersession and stacked Spec approval.

Agent Notes

Read the Agent Note rules before acting. Agent Notes preserve revisitable decisions; they do not replace current code, reference docs, issues, or PR discussion.

Classify the change

Every human-authored PR declares an Agent Note or an explicit N/A reason. Automation-authored PRs (repository workflows and Dependabot) are exempt from this metadata requirement, not from normal validation.

The class names the decision's subject; it does not force every note to start as proposed. Choose the initial lifecycle from whether the target needs human agreement before implementation and whether the decision has already shipped.

  • Use N/A for a local or mechanical edit that restores an existing contract without a durable tradeoff.
  • Write an implemented bug-fix note in the same PR when the repair changes failure, compatibility, security, concurrency, atomicity, lifecycle, or another choice likely to be reversed without its root cause.
  • A small, completed testing or other durable decision that does not meet the Spec-first threshold may enter its owning class as implemented.
  • Start substantial feature, architecture, process, and simplification work with a proposed Spec.
  • Start any class as proposed when behavior, ownership, ACs, alternatives, or risks need human agreement before implementation.

Check the active tree first

Search by domain terms, mechanism names, paths, and rejected alternatives. Classify the result as new, same owner, partial supersession, or full supersession. Update the existing owner when possible. Partial supersessions stay active and cross-linked. Full supersession must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, and verification fact; deleting an old note requires explicit human approval.

There is no archived/ lifecycle yet. Do not archive by age, merge status, moved code, or stale wording. Keep current owners factual; keep fully superseded notes active and cross-linked until a separately approved archive design provides active-first search, successor discovery, and matching gates.

Spec-first stack

  1. Create the bottom Spec branch and proposed bilingual note.
  2. Give observable acceptance criteria contiguous AC IDs and a verification owner.
  3. Create the Spec PR through gh-create-pr; Spec PR is This PR.
  4. Inspect GitHub reviews and require an explicit APPROVED review whose commit id equals the current Spec head. Approval does not require merging.
  5. After Approval, create implementation layers with gh-stack. Each PR links the Spec and lists its AC coverage.
  6. A material behavior, ownership, AC, alternative, or risk change belongs on the Spec branch. Rebase upstack and require Approval again.
  7. The final layer moves all three pair artifacts to implemented/, rewrites shipped reality in present tense, and maps every AC to actual evidence.

Before deciding step 7, run gh stack view --json. If it exits 2, follow the gh-stack skill's remote-discovery procedure; missing local metadata does not prove the PR is standalone. For a stack, inspect the current layer and every downstack implementation PR, then aggregate only ACs backed by verification that was actually run. Intermediate layers keep the note proposed; only the final layer whose cumulative evidence covers every approved AC performs the transition. Do not infer finality from branch order alone.

After gh stack sync, rerun pnpm change:scope against every live PR base and rerun only checks invalidated by the rewritten scope. A successful sync is not validation.

Rejection

Only an explicit human decision moves a proposed note to rejected. Discussion, silence, and CHANGES_REQUESTED do not. Preserve a rejected note only when its evidence prevents a plausible repeated mistake; otherwise close the unmerged exploration without adding repository noise. Stop and close any implementation layers after rejection.

Validation

For a lifecycle move, run pnpm agent-notes:check-transition --base <verified-spec-ref> in addition to pnpm docs:check-notes, the scoped pairing write/check, pnpm docs:check, and git diff --check. The transition checker validates the declared direction and AC mapping; it never decides rejection or stack completion. Report only evidence actually run.

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars52.7k
CategoryAutomation
Updated8h ago
Forks5.1k

Languages

TypeScript

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions