crap-analysis
Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.
Install / Use
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill crap-analysisInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
SKILL.md
Installable skill definition
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Our assessment of crap-analysis
crap-analysis scores 92/100 on our quality scale, 924th of 4,610 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 21%).
Its SKILL.md is 11 KB long, well organised into 38 sections with 11 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.
With 1,183 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 15 days ago, so crap-analysis is actively maintained.
- It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
- Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
crap-analysis compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than crap-analysis; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crap-analysis (this skill)by Aaronontheweb | 92 | 1.2k | 15d ago | SKILL.md |
| ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen | 100 | 44.8k | today | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 41.7k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| algorithmic-artby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
| pptxby anthropics | 100 | 177.9k | 10d ago | SKILL.md |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install crap-analysis?
- Run
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill crap-analysis. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does crap-analysis work with?
- It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is crap-analysis safe to use?
- It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is crap-analysis still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 15 days ago, so crap-analysis is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: crap-analysis description: Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths. invocable: true
CRAP Score Analysis
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Evaluating code quality and test coverage before changes
- Identifying high-risk code that needs refactoring or testing
- Setting up coverage collection for a .NET project
- Prioritizing which code to test based on risk
- Establishing coverage thresholds for CI/CD pipelines
What is CRAP?
CRAP Score = Complexity x (1 - Coverage)^2
The CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score combines cyclomatic complexity with test coverage to identify risky code.
| CRAP Score | Risk Level | Action Required | |------------|------------|-----------------| | < 5 | Low | Well-tested, maintainable code | | 5-30 | Medium | Acceptable but watch complexity | | > 30 | High | Needs tests or refactoring |
Why CRAP Matters
- High complexity + low coverage = danger: Code that's hard to understand AND untested is risky to modify
- Complexity alone isn't enough: A complex method with 100% coverage is safer than a simple method with 0%
- Focuses effort: Prioritize testing on complex code, not simple getters/setters
CRAP Score Examples
| Method | Complexity | Coverage | Calculation | CRAP |
|--------|------------|----------|-------------|------|
| GetUserId() | 1 | 0% | 1 x (1 - 0)^2 | 1 |
| ParseToken() | 54 | 52% | 54 x (1 - 0.52)^2 | 12.4 |
| ValidateForm() | 20 | 0% | 20 x (1 - 0)^2 | 20 |
| ProcessOrder() | 45 | 20% | 45 x (1 - 0.20)^2 | 28.8 |
| ImportData() | 80 | 10% | 80 x (1 - 0.10)^2 | 64.8 |
Coverage Collection Setup
coverage.runsettings
Create a coverage.runsettings file in your repository root. The OpenCover format is required for CRAP score calculation because it includes cyclomatic complexity metrics.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<RunSettings>
<DataCollectionRunSettings>
<DataCollectors>
<DataCollector friendlyName="XPlat code coverage">
<Configuration>
<!-- OpenCover format includes cyclomatic complexity for CRAP scores -->
<Format>cobertura,opencover</Format>
<!-- Exclude test and benchmark assemblies -->
<Exclude>[*.Tests]*,[*.Benchmark]*,[*.Migrations]*</Exclude>
<!-- Exclude generated code, obsolete members, and explicit exclusions -->
<ExcludeByAttribute>Obsolete,GeneratedCodeAttribute,CompilerGeneratedAttribute,ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute</ExcludeByAttribute>
<!-- Exclude source-generated files, Blazor generated code, and migrations -->
<ExcludeByFile>**/obj/**/*,**/*.g.cs,**/*.designer.cs,**/*.razor.g.cs,**/*.razor.css.g.cs,**/Migrations/**/*</ExcludeByFile>
<!-- Exclude test projects -->
<IncludeTestAssembly>false</IncludeTestAssembly>
<!-- Optimization flags -->
<SingleHit>false</SingleHit>
<UseSourceLink>true</UseSourceLink>
<SkipAutoProps>true</SkipAutoProps>
</Configuration>
</DataCollector>
</DataCollectors>
</DataCollectionRunSettings>
</RunSettings>
Key Configuration Options
| Option | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| Format | Must include opencover for complexity metrics |
| Exclude | Exclude test/benchmark assemblies by pattern |
| ExcludeByAttribute | Skip generated, obsolete, and explicitly excluded code (includes ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute) |
| ExcludeByFile | Skip source-generated files, Blazor components, and migrations |
| SkipAutoProps | Don't count auto-properties as branches |
ReportGenerator Installation
Install ReportGenerator as a local tool for generating HTML reports with Risk Hotspots.
Add to .config/dotnet-tools.json
{
"version": 1,
"isRoot": true,
"tools": {
"dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool": {
"version": "5.4.5",
"commands": ["reportgenerator"],
"rollForward": false
}
}
}
Then restore:
dotnet tool restore
Or Install Globally
dotnet tool install --global dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool
Collecting Coverage
Run Tests with Coverage Collection
# Clean previous results
rm -rf coverage/ TestResults/
# Run unit tests with coverage
dotnet test tests/MyApp.Tests.Unit \
--settings coverage.runsettings \
--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
--results-directory ./TestResults
# Run integration tests (optional, adds to coverage)
dotnet test tests/MyApp.Tests.Integration \
--settings coverage.runsettings \
--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
--results-directory ./TestResults
Generate HTML Report
dotnet reportgenerator \
-reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
-targetdir:"coverage" \
-reporttypes:"Html;TextSummary;MarkdownSummaryGithub"
Report Types
| Type | Description | Output |
|------|-------------|--------|
| Html | Full interactive report | coverage/index.html |
| TextSummary | Plain text summary | coverage/Summary.txt |
| MarkdownSummaryGithub | GitHub-compatible markdown | coverage/SummaryGithub.md |
| Badges | SVG badges for README | coverage/badge_*.svg |
| Cobertura | Merged Cobertura XML | coverage/Cobertura.xml |
Reading the Report
Risk Hotspots Section
The HTML report includes a Risk Hotspots section showing methods sorted by complexity:
- Cyclomatic Complexity: Number of independent paths through code (if/else, switch cases, loops)
- NPath Complexity: Number of acyclic execution paths (exponential growth with nesting)
- Crap Score: Calculated from complexity and coverage
Interpreting Results
Risk Hotspots
─────────────
Method Complexity Coverage Crap Score
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
DataImporter.ParseRecord() 54 52% 12.4
AuthService.ValidateToken() 32 0% 32.0 ← HIGH RISK
OrderProcessor.Calculate() 28 85% 1.3
UserService.CreateUser() 15 100% 0.0
Action items:
ValidateToken()has CRAP > 30 with 0% coverage - test immediately or refactorParseRecord()is complex but has decent coverage - acceptableCreateUser()andCalculate()are well-tested - safe to modify
Coverage Thresholds
Recommended Standards
| Coverage Type | Target | Action | |---------------|--------|--------| | Line Coverage | > 80% | Good for most projects | | Branch Coverage | > 60% | Catches conditional logic | | CRAP Score | < 30 | Maximum for new code |
Configuring Thresholds
Create coverage.props in your repository:
<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
<!-- Coverage thresholds for CI enforcement -->
<CoverageThresholdLine>80</CoverageThresholdLine>
<CoverageThresholdBranch>60</CoverageThresholdBranch>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
CI/CD Integration
GitHub Actions
name: Coverage
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main, dev]
jobs:
coverage:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: '9.0.x'
- name: Restore tools
run: dotnet tool restore
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: |
dotnet test \
--settings coverage.runsettings \
--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
--results-directory ./TestResults
- name: Generate report
run: |
dotnet reportgenerator \
-reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
-targetdir:"coverage" \
-reporttypes:"Html;MarkdownSummaryGithub;Cobertura"
- name: Upload coverage report
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: coverage-report
path: coverage/
- name: Add coverage to PR
uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v2
with:
path: coverage/SummaryGithub.md
Azure Pipelines
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Run tests with coverage'
inputs:
command: 'test'
arguments: '--settings coverage.runsettings --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" --results-directory $(Build.SourcesDirectory)/TestResults'
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Generate coverage report'
inputs:
command: 'custom'
custom: 'reportgenerator'
arguments: '-reports:"$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" -targetdir:"$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/coverage" -reporttypes:"HtmlInline_AzurePipelines;Cobertura"'
- task: PublishCodeCoverageResults@2
displayName: 'Publish coverage'
inputs:
codeCoverageTool: 'Cobertura'
summaryFileLocation: '$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/coverage/Cobertura.xml'
Quick Reference
One-Liner Commands
# Full analysis workflow
rm -rf coverage/ TestResults/ && \
dotnet test --settings coverage.runsettings \
--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
--results-directory ./TestResults && \
dotnet reportgenerator \
-reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
-targetdir:"coverage" \
-reporttypes:"Html;TextSummary"
# View summary
cat coverage/Summary.txt
# Open HTML report (Linux)
xdg-open coverage/index.html
# Open HTML report (macOS)
open coverage/index.html
# Open HTML report (Windows)
start coverage/index.html
Project Standards
| Metric | New Code | Legacy Code | |--------|----------|-------------| | Line Coverage | 80%+ | 60%+ (improve gradually) | | Branch Coverage | 60%+ | 40%+ (improve gradually) | | Maximum CRAP | 30 | Document exceptions | | High-risk methods | Must have tests | Add tests before modifying |
What Gets Excluded
The recommended coverage.runsettings excludes:
| Pattern | Reason |
|---------|--------|
| [*.Tests]* | Test assemblies aren't production code |
| [*.Benchmark]* | Benchmark projects |
| [*.Migrations]* | Database migrations (generated) |
| GeneratedCodeAttribute | Source generators |
| CompilerGeneratedAttribute | Compiler-generated code |
| ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute | Explicit developer opt-out |
| *.g.cs, *.designer.cs | Generated files |
| *.razor.g.cs | Blazor component generated code |
| *.razor.css.g.cs | Blazor CSS isolation generated code |
| **/Migrations/**/* | EF Core migrations (auto-generated) |
| SkipAutoProps | Auto-properties (trivial branches) |
When to Update Thresholds
Lower thresholds temporarily for:
- Legacy codebases being modernized (document in README)
- Generated code that can't be modified
- Third-party wrapper code
Never lower thresholds for:
- "It's too hard to test" - refactor instead
- "We'll add tests later" - add them now
- New features - should meet standards from the start
Additional Resources
- Coverlet Documentation: https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet
- ReportGenerator: https://github.com/danielpalme/ReportGenerator
- CRAP Score Original Paper: http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=215899
Related Skills
ai-job-search
44.8kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
41.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
algorithmic-art
177.9kCreating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems.
pptx
177.9kUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an em…
Languages
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
