SkillAgentSearch skills...

aot-trimming

Guidelines for making .NET libraries and applications trimming-safe and Native AOT compatible. Covers the trimming/AOT model, the MSBuild properties that enable analysis (IsTrimmable, IsAotCompatible, PublishTrimmed, PublishAot), the trimming attributes (RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode…

Install / Use

npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill aot-trimming

Installs into whichever agent you are using.

About this skill
📄

SKILL.md

Installable skill definition

Quality Score

92/100

Supported Platforms

Universal

Tags

Our assessment of aot-trimming

aot-trimming scores 92/100 on our quality scale, 922nd of 4,610 Development & Engineering skills we index (top 20%).

Its SKILL.md is 11 KB long, well organised into 13 sections with 4 code examples: a thorough specification that gives an agent plenty to work with.

With 1,183 GitHub stars, it is one of the more widely adopted skills in the catalogue.

Substance
29/30
Structure
20/20
Description
15/15
Adoption
13/20
Freshness
15/15

Maintenance, license and trust

  • The repository was last updated 15 days ago, so aot-trimming is actively maintained.
  • It is released under the MIT license, a permissive license that allows use, modification and commercial use with attribution.
  • Its trust signals score 100/100, with no cautions. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.

aot-trimming compared with similar skills

All 4 of these similar skills score higher than aot-trimming; compare them before choosing.

SkillScoreStarsUpdatedFormat
aot-trimming (this skill)by Aaronontheweb921.2k15d agoSKILL.md
ai-job-searchby MadsLorentzen10044.8ktodayCLAUDE.md
claude-howtoby luongnv8910041.7k3d agoCLAUDE.md
algorithmic-artby anthropics100177.9k10d agoSKILL.md
pptxby anthropics100177.9k10d agoSKILL.md

Frequently asked questions

How do I install aot-trimming?
Run npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill aot-trimming. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent.
Which AI agents does aot-trimming work with?
It is written for Universal, as a SKILL.md file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
Is aot-trimming safe to use?
It is MIT-licensed and scores 100/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
Is aot-trimming still maintained?
The repository was last updated 15 days ago, so aot-trimming is actively maintained.

name: aot-trimming description: "Guidelines for making .NET libraries and applications trimming-safe and Native AOT compatible. Covers the trimming/AOT model, the MSBuild properties that enable analysis (IsTrimmable, IsAotCompatible, PublishTrimmed, PublishAot), the trimming attributes (RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode, DynamicallyAccessedMembers, UnconditionalSuppressMessage), IL2xxx/IL3xxx warning codes, and a pattern playbook: source generators and UnsafeAccessor, generated-interception diagnostic suppressors, intentional runtime scanning boundaries, trimming-safe islands and feature switches, migration analyzers, and temporary warning-approval baselines. Use when introducing trimming/AOT support, resolving IL2xxx/IL3xxx warnings, or making reflection-heavy code trimming-safe in C# / .NET codebases. For System.Text.Json AOT scenarios, see also the serialization skill." version: 1.0.0 tags:

  • csharp
  • dotnet
  • aot
  • trimming
  • nativeaot
  • code-quality

.NET Trimming and Native AOT

When to Use

  • Adding trimming (PublishTrimmed) or Native AOT (PublishAot) support to a library or application
  • Resolving IL2xxx (trimming) and IL3xxx (AOT/single-file) warnings
  • Making reflection-heavy code trimming-safe
  • Replacing runtime reflection, assembly scanning, or Reflection.Emit with compile-time alternatives
  • Reviewing a codebase or PR for trimming/AOT compatibility, including generated interceptors and analyzer suppressors
  • Designing public APIs that must carry trimming annotations

Core Goals

  • Produce code that survives the linker's reachability analysis and runs under Native AOT (no JIT).
  • Express what the compiler cannot see — which members reflection needs — using the trimming attributes.
  • Keep trimming-safe and trimming-unsafe code separated so unsafe paths are explicit and contained.

Core Model

Trimming vs Native AOT

  • Trimming (PublishTrimmed) runs ILLink reachability analysis: only statically reachable code is kept. Reflection the analyzer cannot see is trimmed away and produces warnings.
  • Native AOT (PublishAot) makes trimming mandatory and removes the JIT. Reflection.Emit is unsupported, constructing unknown generic instantiations at runtime is not guaranteed, Expression.Compile() may fall back to interpretation, and reflection works only over members the linker preserved.
  • Both run the same static analysis:
    • IL2xxx — trimming warnings: RequiresUnreferencedCode propagation + DynamicallyAccessedMembers dataflow.
    • IL3xxx — AOT and single-file warnings: RequiresDynamicCode / RequiresAssemblyFiles.

A library can be trimmable but not AOT-compatible (it uses Reflection.Emit, which trimming tolerates but AOT does not).

The two problems to solve

  1. Unseen reflection (trimming): the linker removes a member or type you load by name, or reach through typeof(T) in a generic method.
  2. Dynamic code generation (AOT): the JIT is gone, so Reflection.Emit is unsupported and constructing unknown generic instantiations is not guaranteed.

Both are solved the same way: make the required members statically visible to the analyzer, or remove the need for reflection entirely.

Reflection is not the enemy

Reflection is a legitimate technique and is completely fine in ordinary JIT applications — you need none of this there. The trimming attributes exist to allow reflection under trimming/AOT, not to forbid it: annotate what reflection needs, and the linker keeps it. Reach for source generators, [UnsafeAccessor], or capability gating only when you want a specific reflective surface removed or contained (for example, a public registration API you do not want to ship with [RequiresUnreferencedCode]).

Project Configuration

For a library, declare compatibility so the analyzers surface warnings and consumers know:

<PropertyGroup>
  <!-- Trim-compatible: enables trim warnings. -->
  <IsTrimmable>true</IsTrimmable>

  <!-- AOT-compatible: implies IsTrimmable + EnableTrimAnalyzer + EnableSingleFileAnalyzer + EnableAotAnalyzer. -->
  <IsAotCompatible Condition="$([MSBuild]::IsTargetFrameworkCompatible('$(TargetFramework)', 'net8.0'))">true</IsAotCompatible>
</PropertyGroup>

For an application, publish trimmed or AOT:

<PropertyGroup>
  <PublishTrimmed>true</PublishTrimmed>
  <!-- or -->
  <PublishAot>true</PublishAot>
</PropertyGroup>

Verify by actually publishing — a trimmed/AOT app must produce zero warnings:

dotnet publish -c Release -r <rid> -p:PublishTrimmed=true
dotnet publish -c Release -r <rid> -p:PublishAot=true

A test app that roots the library is the standard way to validate a library:

<PropertyGroup>
  <PublishTrimmed>true</PublishTrimmed>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
  <ProjectReference Include="..\MyLibrary\MyLibrary.csproj" />
  <TrimmerRootAssembly Include="MyLibrary" />
</ItemGroup>

See aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md for the full property table, feature switches, and the warning-approval baseline pattern.

The Attribute Model

These live in System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis. See trimming-attributes-reference.md for the full catalog with exact signatures, warning codes, and rules.

  • [RequiresUnreferencedCode(message)] — marks code that needs members the linker cannot see. Suppresses warnings inside; emits IL2026 at every call site.
  • [RequiresDynamicCode(message)] — marks code that needs a JIT (emitting, dynamic). Emits IL3050 at call sites.
  • [DynamicallyAccessedMembers(memberTypes)] — declares which members of a Type/string must be preserved. Flows backward from the reflection site to the Type source. Scope it (and the other attributes) to a single accessor by placing the attribute directly on the accessor, or with the [method:], [field:], or [return:] targets.
  • [UnconditionalSuppressMessage(category, checkId, Justification = "...")] — last-resort, IL-persisted suppression; must carry a justification and a real invariant.
  • [DynamicDependency("Member", typeof(T))] — keeps named members but does not silence warnings.

Choose the narrowest DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes for the reflection you actually perform:

| Reflection | Member type | | --- | --- | | Activator.CreateInstance<T>(), new T(), Activator.CreateInstance(type) | PublicParameterlessConstructor | | DI activation (ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory<T>) | PublicConstructors | | Explicit non-public activation | NonPublicConstructors | | type.GetInterfaces() | Interfaces | | type.GetMethods() | PublicMethods (add NonPublicMethods when needed) | | type.GetProperties() | PublicProperties | | type.GetFields() | PublicFields | | type.GetNestedTypes() | PublicNestedTypes |

The Pattern Playbook (selection)

First decide whether the code must be trimming/AOT safe at all. A plain JIT app or library needs none of this — reflection is fine there. Only when you or a consumer publish trimmed/AOT does reflection need to become visible to the linker.

The goal is never "remove all reflection"; it is make the reflection statically visible so the linker keeps what it needs. Choose per call site:

  • Keep the reflection and annotate it — the common case. Put [DynamicallyAccessedMembers(...)] on the Type/string source and propagate it through the chain; mark entry points [RequiresUnreferencedCode]/[RequiresDynamicCode]. The attributes exist precisely to let reflection work under trimming. See trimming-attributes-reference.md.

  • Replace the reflection with a compile-time alternative — when you want a reflective surface gone (for example, a public registration API you do not want to ship with [RequiresUnreferencedCode]). A source generator emits direct type references (marker attribute → generated registration); [UnsafeAccessor] replaces FieldInfo/MethodInfo/ConstructorInfo. See aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md and aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md.

  • Isolate a whole dynamic path — when a path is inherently dynamic (emitting proxies, loading plugins by name), move it behind a boundary and provide a trimming-safe alternative selected by RuntimeFeature.IsDynamicCodeSupported. See aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md.

  • Suppress only as a last resort — a single [UnconditionalSuppressMessage(...)] at an invariant-proven leaf, with a Justification. Never #pragma (not persisted in IL).

See aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md for the full playbook, including object-overload → generic-overload redirects, generated-interception suppressors, intentional scanning boundaries, migration analyzers, strict-mode precedence, and temporary warning-approval baselines.

Reference Files

  • trimming-attributes-reference.md: The complete attribute catalog — RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode, DynamicallyAccessedMembers (full DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes list), UnconditionalSuppressMessage, DynamicDependency — each with intent, exact signature, and rules, plus the IL2xxx/IL3xxx warning-code table.
  • aot-trimming-playbook-reference.md: The full pattern playbook — source generators vs reflection, trimming-safe islands and capability guards, separating safe/unsafe code, System.Text.Json source generation, object-overload → generic-overload redirects with [OverloadResolutionPriority] and opt-in analyzers, migration analyzers, warning-approval baselines, known gotchas, and the full generation checklist.

Generation Checklist (Summary)

  1. Project — IsTrimmable/IsAotCompatible on libraries; PublishTrimmed/PublishAot on apps; zero warnings on publish.
  2. Make reflection visible (or replace it) — annotate the reflection you keep (DynamicallyAccessedMembers/RequiresUnreferencedCode/RequiresDynamicCode); replace it with source generators, generic (typeof(T)) APIs, or [UnsafeAccessor] only where you want the reflective surface gone.
  3. Annotate — narrowest DynamicallyAccessedMembers on every Type/string source; propagate through the chain; [RequiresUnreferencedCode]/[RequiresDynamicCode] on unsafe entry points.
  4. Isolate — keep unsafe reflective/emit code behind a boundary; gate dynamic-code paths with RuntimeFeature.IsDynamicCodeSupported, and separate trimming paths with #if or annotations.
  5. Suppress — only with [UnconditionalSuppressMessage] + justification at invariant-proven leaves; never #pragma/SuppressMessage.
  6. Verify — publish trimmed and AOT, run analyzers, and lock the warning surface with an approval baseline.

References

Related Skills

View on GitHub
GitHub Stars1.2k
CategoryDevelopment
Updated15d ago
Forks109

Languages

Shell

Trust signals

100/100

From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.

No cautions