ai-workspace-standards
Master configuration for Vibe Coding and Harness Engineering — workspace standards for Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and all AI tools
Install / Use
npx skills add 5throck/ai-workspace-standards --skill ci-triageInstalls into whichever agent you are using.
Gemini Rules
Gemini CLI config
Quality Score
Category
Development & EngineeringSupported Platforms
Tags
Our assessment of ai-workspace-standards
ai-workspace-standards scores 72/100 on our quality scale, 3750th of 4,624 Development & Engineering skills we index.
Its Gemini Rules is 5.3 KB long, well organised into 10 sections with 2 code examples: a solid amount of guidance for an agent.
It has no GitHub stars yet, so there is no community track record; judge it on its content.
Maintenance, license and trust
- The repository was last updated 7 days ago, so ai-workspace-standards is actively maintained.
- Our last check on 2026-10-18 found the source still online.
- No license is declared. By default that means all rights are reserved: you can read it, but reusing or redistributing it is not clearly permitted. Ask the author before building on it commercially.
- Its trust signals score 80/100, with 2 cautions from licensing, adoption, age or documentation. These come from repository metadata, not a code audit — read the skill file before letting an agent act on it.
ai-workspace-standards compared with similar skills
All 4 of these similar skills score higher than ai-workspace-standards; compare them before choosing.
| Skill | Score | Stars | Updated | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ai-workspace-standards (this skill)by 5throck | 72 | 0 | 7d ago | Gemini Rules |
| taste-skillby Leonxlnx | 100 | 111.3k | 2d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| ai-job-searchby ai-job-search-dev | 100 | 70.1k | 1d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| claude-howtoby luongnv89 | 100 | 46.7k | 3d ago | CLAUDE.md |
| lobehubby lobehub | 100 | 84.2k | today | MCP Server |
Frequently asked questions
- How do I install ai-workspace-standards?
- Run
npx skills add 5throck/ai-workspace-standards. The install tabs above show the steps for each supported agent. - Which AI agents does ai-workspace-standards work with?
- It is written for Gemini CLI, as a Gemini Rules file. Other agents that read the same format can often use it too.
- Is ai-workspace-standards safe to use?
- It declares no license and scores 80/100 on trust signals. Skills are instructions an agent will follow, so read the file before installing it and do not approve commands you do not understand.
- Is ai-workspace-standards still maintained?
- The repository was last updated 7 days ago, so ai-workspace-standards is actively maintained.
Skill content
View source on GitHubname: ci-triage status: active scope: common description: > Triages CI / audit / scaffold failures: deterministic reproduction, minimal repro, provenance tracing, root-cause fix, and re-verification. Lightweight alternative to a full project review when a single failure has a single cause. Use when: a CI check fails on a PR; an audit/validator gate blocks a sync; a scaffold or upgrade command errors; a weekly-health-check ci-failure issue needs triage. owner: pm version: 0.2.0 last_reviewed: 2026-10-04 prerequisites: [] metadata: type: process triggers: - ci failure - triage failure - audit gate failed - scaffold failed - fix the pipeline related_skills: - project-review - sync
ci-triage
Lightweight loop for CI / audit / scaffold failures: reproduce → minimize → trace → fix →
verify. Escalate to project-review (scoped mode) only when the failure spans multiple
unrelated domains.
When to Use (and when NOT to)
Use: one failing check, one command, one gate — including weekly-health-check
ci-failure issues and dev-sync gate blocks.
Do NOT use: broad quality sweeps, proactive reviews, or when ≥3 unrelated domains fail
at once (that is a project-review job — switch, scoped mode first).
Step 1 — Reproduce deterministically
Re-run the exact failing command locally and capture the failing check ID verbatim:
bun scripts/audit.ts # or the specific validator that failed
bun scripts/validate-templates.ts
bun scripts/new-project.ts <scratch-name> --variant <v> # scaffold repro — scratch dir only
Rules:
- Scaffold reproductions go in a scratch directory outside
Projects/; never reproduce by mutating a live project. - If the failure does NOT reproduce locally, suspect environment/ordering (CI matrix OS, node version, test ordering) — do not "fix" code that isn't broken.
Step 2 — Minimize
Strip to the smallest input that still fails: one variant (--domain / single file), one
flag, one key. The goal is a one-command repro you can paste into a ticket.
Step 3 — Trace provenance
Find the introducing commit and its intent:
git log -S "<literal string from the failure>" -- <file>
git log --oneline -- <file>
Read the introducing PR before changing anything — the mismatch may be the other side of an intentional change (proven: 2026-09-07 — a root-vs-L1 SCRIPTS.md layer-tag split traced to a single commit).
Step 4 — Fix at the root
Fix the introducing file, not the symptom site. Prefer validator/scaffold correctness over
allowlists and || true. Route implementation through the normal PM Gateway (specialists
execute). Never --no-verify, never gate bypasses.
Step 5 — Verify + harden
- Re-run the failing validator and the surrounding battery (at minimum:
bun scripts/audit.ts+bun scripts/validate-templates.ts+bun scripts/verify-scripts.ts --verify). - Ratchet rule: if this failure class could recur unnoticed, create a
validator-hardening ticket:
bun scripts/ticket.ts create --manual "validator-hardening: <one-sentence check>" --priority normal - Clean up scratch artifacts (
rm -rfthe scratch project;git statusclean). - Land the fix via the standard
/syncpipeline.
Step 6 — Merge with CI watch (merge-time healing)
The merge itself is part of the loop: a PR is not done when it opens, it is done when it is merged with green checks. Proven procedure (2026-10-04 wave, PRs #1376-#1382):
- Watch, do not walk away:
gh pr checks <pr> --watch. Merge only on all-green. - On red, read the failed job's own log (
gh run view <run> --log-failed | tail), then classify:- Flake / slow-runner timeout (test timed out at Ns on one OS only, same test
green locally and on other OSes) → give the test an explicit timeout with an
evidence comment (
}, 15_000);+ "why" comment naming the run), push, re-watch. - Real defect → go back to Step 1 (reproduce) on the PR branch.
- Registry/version parity failures (SCRIPTS.md, VERSION_MANIFEST drift) → run
the generator, land via
/syncon the PR branch.
- Flake / slow-runner timeout (test timed out at Ns on one OS only, same test
green locally and on other OSes) → give the test an explicit timeout with an
evidence comment (
- Sequential merges: every
/syncappends to shared session files (memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md), so merging one PR marks the next one conflicting. Merge one PR at a time; before each next merge, update its branch from the new main (git merge origin/main, regenerate the version manifest if the pre-push gate says so, land the branch update via/sync), then merge. - GitHub-side stale states: a CONFLICTING/DIRTY verdict that local
git merge-tree --write-treecontradicts is usually a stale mergeability cache — update the branch (which re-computes it) instead of hand-resolving phantom conflicts. - Close the PR's governance tickets (
move <id> done --result "Delivered via PR #N…") and land the closure through/sync.
Escalation
- ≥3 unrelated domains failing →
project-reviewwithscopedmode. - Failure only in CI (not locally) → compare OS/node matrices first; check
.github/workflows/test.ymlstep environment before touching code. - Security-flavored failure (gitleaks,
bun audit) → involvesecurity-expertper §9.6.
Related Skills
- project-review: broad multi-domain review — ci-triage is the single-failure counterpart
- sync: landing pipeline for the fix
Related Skills
taste-skill
111.3kAgent skills that give coding agents taste: art direction, reference images and a browser check instead of generic AI pages
ai-job-search
70.1kThe job search that runs on your machine. AI job application framework built on Claude Code: evaluate postings, tailor CVs, write cover letters, prep interviews. Fork it and own it.
claude-howto
46.7kA visual, example-driven guide to Claude Code — from basic concepts to advanced agents, with copy-paste templates that bring immediate value.
lobehub
84.2k🤯 LobeHub - Super-Agents on Your Team. Add super-agents to the chats your team already uses.They take on work by themselves and get better every week.
Trust signals
From repository metadata: license, adoption, age and documentation. Not a code audit — see the Safety scan above for what the skill file itself contains.
