1,934 skills found · Page 36 of 65
cbrock84 / ux-product-auditorAudits a website, app, onboarding flow, or design for usability, conversion, and product problems, tying every finding to a business outcome and a severity.
cbrock84 / deal-negotiationNegotiates a commercial deal without giving away the terms that matter — preparing your walk-away and theirs, trading concessions rather than conceding them, recognizing the tactics that create false urgency, protecting price by moving other variables, and closing on terms someone can actually deliv…
cbrock84 / access-and-identityDesigns and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process.
cbrock84 / incident-responseRuns a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward.
cbrock84 / security-architecture-reviewReviews a design or change for security before it ships — authentication and authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, and the secure-development practices around it.
cbrock84 / api-designDesigns interfaces that survive their consumers — resource modeling, errors, versioning, pagination, and compatibility. Use this to design a new API, review one before it ships, decide how to version or deprecate, fix an interface consumers keep misusing, or work out whether a change is breaking.
cbrock84 / cloud-infrastructureDesigns and runs cloud infrastructure — environments, infrastructure as code, networking and isolation, scaling, and cost.
cbrock84 / observability-and-reliabilityMakes systems debuggable and reliably operable — instrumentation, alerting that is worth waking for, service objectives, and learning from failure.
cbrock84 / skill-authoringWrites and revises agent skills so they trigger at the right moments and give usable instruction when they do. Use this when creating a new skill, editing an existing one, diagnosing a skill that fires too often or never fires, or reviewing a set of skills for overlap.
cbrock84 / assessment-designBuilds questions and assessments that measure what they claim — matching item type to the thing being assessed, writing distractors that diagnose, and telling a question that measures learning from one that measures reading speed or test-taking.
callstackincubator / react-native-testingWrite tests using React Native Testing Library (RNTL) v13 and v14 (`@testing-library/react-native`)
callstackincubator / react-native-tv-best-practicesReviews React Native TV apps for focus/D-pad navigation, 10-foot UI layout, TV playback/DRM integration, low-memory TV performance, and TV accessibility
feiskyer / github-review-prReview GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR UR…
feiskyer / codex-skillLeverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见".
feiskyer / grill-me针对方案或设计的高强度追问式面试（adversarial design review / grill session），暴露假设漏洞与缺失约束，过程中同步维护领域模型（术语表和 ADR）。手动调用 /grill-me。
codeaholicguy / memoryAI DevKit · Use the memory CLI as a durable knowledge layer. Search before non-trivial work, store verified reusable knowledge, update stale entries, and avoid saving transcripts, secrets, or one-off task progress.
rmyndharis / code-review-ai-ai-reviewCombine static analysis with model-assisted code review to assess security, performance, correctness, and architecture
rmyndharis / error-debugging-multi-agent-reviewCoordinate specialized code, security, architecture, and performance reviewers and consolidate their results
rmyndharis / dotnet-architectExpert .NET backend architect specializing in C#, ASP.NET Core,
pedrohcgs / review-paperComprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal).
pedrohcgs / seven-pass-reviewMechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 fresh-context subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist.
pedrohcgs / new-diagramScaffold a new TikZ diagram from the snippet gallery with prevention rules pre-applied (explicit node dimensions, coordinate map, directional edge labels). Compiles standalone, invokes tikz-reviewer with citations from tikz-measurement.md, and loops on revisions until APPROVED.
pedrohcgs / verify-claimsRun Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable
pedrohcgs / slide-excellenceMulti-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally)
pedrohcgs / promote-memoryReview candidate learnings in Claude Code's native auto memory (`~/.claude/projects/<project>/memory/`, machine-local) and run them through a five-critic council in parallel: generality, staleness, redundancy, evidence, format. Majority vote (3+ of 5) promotes the entry to MEMORY.md
pedrohcgs / vaccinateQualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch. Seeds known defects into a copy of a real artifact plus a clean control, runs the checker, and reports recall and false-positive rate into a qualification ledger
pedrohcgs / interview-meInteractive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ, hypotheses, identification, data needs, empirical strategy)
pedrohcgs / devils-advocateAdversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation
pedrohcgs / adjudicate-reviewTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source
pedrohcgs / deep-auditComprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify
